scholarly journals 3D Printing of Osage Orange Extract/Chitosan Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Engineering

2021 ◽  
pp. 100039
Author(s):  
Elif Saatcioglu ◽  
Muge Koyun ◽  
Songul Ulag ◽  
Ali Sahin ◽  
Betul Karademir Yilmaz ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1653-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengdong Ji ◽  
Nasim Annabi ◽  
Ali Khademhosseini ◽  
Fariba Dehghani

Biomaterials ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 170-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Mondschein ◽  
Akanksha Kanitkar ◽  
Christopher B. Williams ◽  
Scott S. Verbridge ◽  
Timothy E. Long

2020 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 116058 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.Q. Zhao ◽  
W.G. Liu ◽  
Z.Y. Xu ◽  
J.G. Li ◽  
T.T. Huang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 234 ◽  
pp. 268-280
Author(s):  
Daniel Enrique López Angulo ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Ambrosio ◽  
Rodrigo Lourenço ◽  
Natalia Juliana Nardelli Gonçalves ◽  
Fabio Sergio Cury ◽  
...  

Polymers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Perez-Puyana ◽  
Mercedes Jiménez-Rosado ◽  
Alberto Romero ◽  
Antonio Guerrero

Biomaterials have been used since ancient times. However, it was not until the late 1960s when their development prospered, increasing the research on them. In recent years, the study of biomaterials has focused mainly on tissue regeneration, requiring a biomaterial that can support cells during their growth and fulfill the function of the replaced tissue until its regeneration. These materials, called scaffolds, have been developed with a wide variety of materials and processes, with the polymer ones being the most advanced. For this reason, the need arises for a review that compiles the techniques most used in the development of polymer-based scaffolds. This review has focused on three of the most used techniques: freeze-drying, electrospinning and 3D printing, focusing on current and future trends. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of each of them have been compared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document