scholarly journals Fuel consumption of free-swimming school versus FAD strategies in tropical tuna purse seine fishing

2022 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 106139
Author(s):  
Oihane C. Basurko ◽  
Gorka Gabiña ◽  
Jon Lopez ◽  
Igor Granado ◽  
Hilario Murua ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Gwenaëlle Wain ◽  
Loreleï Guéry ◽  
David Michael Kaplan ◽  
Daniel Gaertner

Abstract Numerous pelagic species are known to associate with floating objects (FOBs), including tropical tunas. Purse seiners use this behaviour to facilitate the capture of tropical tunas by deploying artificial drifting fish aggregating devices (dFADs). One major recent change has been the integration of echosounders in satellite-tracked GPS buoys attached to FOBs, allowing fishers to remotely estimate fishable biomass. Understanding the effects of this new technology on catch of the three main tuna species (yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares; bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus; and skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis) is important to accurately correct for this change in catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) indices used for stock assessments. We analysed catch data from the French purse seine fleet for the period 2010–2017 in the Indian Ocean to assess the impact of this fleet’s switch to echosounder buoys around 2012. Results indicate that echosounders do not increase the probability a set will be succesful, but they have a positive effect on catch per set, with catches on average increasing by ≈2−2.5 tonnes per set (≈10%) when made on the vessel's own dFADs equipped with an echosounder buoy. Increases were due to a decrease in sets below ≈25 tonnes and an increase in those greater than ≈25 tonnes, with a non-linear transition around this threshold. This increase explains the considerable investment of purse seiners in echosounder buoys, but also raises concerns about bias in stock size estimates based on CPUE if we do not correct for this fishing efficiency increase.


2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1849-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia E. Snouck-Hurgronje ◽  
David M. Kaplan ◽  
Emmanuel Chassot ◽  
Alexandra Maufroy ◽  
Daniel Gaertner

Fishing on floating objects (FOBs) dominates catch in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries. One frequently cited advantage of deploying GPS-monitored FOBs is that the position information can be used for directed fishing to reduce search time for tuna. However, purse seiners also fish on foreign objects for which position information is not available. It is critical to quantify the prevalence of fishing on GPS-monitored versus unmonitored FOBs to understand how they impact fishing effort and catch per unit effort. We analyzed French commercial, observer, and FOB trajectory data in the Atlantic and Indian oceans to determine how often purse seine vessels fish on GPS-monitored FOBs. Only 2.7%–20.4% of French FOB fishing sets over 2007–2013 in both oceans were made on GPS-monitored FOBs. Though increasing over time, the low percentage suggests that French vessels do not primarily use GPS-monitored FOBs to reduce search time for tuna. We hypothesize that fishery-wide FOB deployments have important collective consequences for overall fishing effort and recommend that future effort metrics should be based on fishery-wide FOB activities.


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 1463-1467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Dagorn ◽  
John D. Filmalter ◽  
Fabien Forget ◽  
Monin Justin Amandè ◽  
Martin A. Hall ◽  
...  

Sustainability of living resource exploitation relies on an ecosystem management approach. Within tropical tuna purse seine fisheries using fish aggregating devices (FADs), such an approach incorporates the reduction of bycatch, in particular vulnerable species such as elasmobranchs. The levels of total bycatch (in mass) from fishing operations using FADs is known to be five times higher than when tuna are caught in free-swimming schools. We intend to find practical solutions to reduce bycatch in FAD sets through the investigation of the relationships between the ratio of bycatch to target catch across different set size classes in all oceans. Ratios were always highest when catches were small, with the smallest class of catches responsible for the highest total portion of bycatch (23%–43%) while only contributing negligibly to the total target catch (3%–10%). Reducing the number of fishing sets (a part of the total effort) while maintaining the same total yield could contribute to a substantial reduction in the impacts of human activities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 169-170 ◽  
pp. 104621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Hwa Sun (Jenny) ◽  
Mark N. Maunder ◽  
Minling Pan ◽  
Alexandre Aires-da-Silva ◽  
William H. Bayliff ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 521 ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
MR Hutchinson ◽  
DG Itano ◽  
JA Muir ◽  
KN Holland

Author(s):  
Manon Airaud ◽  
Laurent Tezenas ◽  
Gala Moreno ◽  
Laurent Dagorn ◽  
Jefferson Murua

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 1501-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monin J. Amandè ◽  
Emmanuel Chassot ◽  
Pierre Chavance ◽  
Hilario Murua ◽  
Alicia Delgado de Molina ◽  
...  

Abstract Amandè, M. J., Chassot, E., Chavance, P., Murua, H., Delgado de Molina, A., and Bez, N. 2012. Precision in bycatch estimates: the case of tuna purse-seine fisheries in the Indian Ocean. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: . Estimating bycatch, i.e. the incidental catch of non-target marine animals and undersized individuals of target species, by raising observer data to the whole fishery is routine practice. The annual bycatch of the European tropical tuna purse-seine fishery over the period 2003–2009 was estimated at 11 590 t [95% confidence interval: (8165–15 818 t)], corresponding to 4.7% of the tuna landings. An analysis of the variability in the precision of this estimate, based on generalized linear models and Monte Carlo simulations, showed that the current sampling coverage of the tropical tuna fishery observer programme, which is 4.6% of the fishing trips, resulted in large uncertainties in bycatch estimates by species, i.e. none of the estimates have a relative root mean square error smaller than 50%. Although the overall magnitude of bycatch of the fishery appeared to be small, the current sampling coverage was insufficient to give any reliable estimate for low-occurring species, such as marine turtles, some oceanic pelagic sharks, and some billfishes. Increasing the sampling coverage would likely improve bycatch estimates. Simulation outputs were produced to help define (i) trade-offs between the priority species to be monitored, (ii) the estimation precision, (iii) expected accuracy, and (iv) the associated sampling costs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Watcharapong Chumchuen ◽  
Tatsuro Matsuoka ◽  
Kazuhiko Anraku ◽  
Sukchai Arnupapboon

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. e01393
Author(s):  
Laura Mannocci ◽  
Fabien Forget ◽  
Mariana Travassos Tolotti ◽  
Pascal Bach ◽  
Nicolas Bez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document