Influence of prescribed fire and forest structure on woodland salamander abundance in the central Appalachians, USA

2020 ◽  
Vol 468 ◽  
pp. 118185
Author(s):  
Carl D. Jacobsen ◽  
Donald J. Brown ◽  
William D. Flint ◽  
Jamie L. Schuler ◽  
Thomas M. Schuler
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2301-2319
Author(s):  
Jeffery B. Cannon ◽  
Benjamin M. Gannon ◽  
Jonas A. Feinstein ◽  
Eunice A. Padley ◽  
Loretta J. Metz

Abstract Context Several initiatives seek to increase the pace and scale of dry forest restoration and fuels reduction to enhance forest resilience to wildfire and other stressors while improving the quality and reliability of key ecosystem services. Ecological effects models are increasingly used to prioritize these efforts at the landscape-scale based on simulated treatment outcomes. Objectives Treatments are often simulated using uniform post-treatment target conditions or proportional changes to baseline forest structure variables, but do not account for the common objective of restoration to mimic the complex forest structure that was present historically which is thought to provide an example of structural conditions that contributed to ecosystem diversity and resilience. Methods We simulate spatially homogenous fire hazard reduction treatments along with heterogeneous restoration treatments in dry conifer forests to investigate how spatial complexity affects ecological indicators of (1) forest structural heterogeneity, (2) forest and watershed vulnerability to high-severity fire, and (3) feasibility of future prescribed fire use. Results Our results suggest that spatially explicit restoration treatments should produce similar wildfire and prescribed fire outcomes as homogeneous fuels reduction treatments, but with greater forest structural heterogeneity. The lack of strong tradeoffs between ecological objectives suggests the primary benefit of spatially complex treatments is to increase forest structural heterogeneity which may promote biodiversity. Conclusions We show that landscape-scale prioritization to maximize ecological benefits can change when spatially complex restoration treatments are modeled. Coupling landscape-scale management simulations and ecological effects models offers flexible decision support for conservation assessment, prioritization, and planning.


Fire Ecology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody L. Dems ◽  
Alan H. Taylor ◽  
Erica A. H. Smithwick ◽  
Jesse K. Kreye ◽  
Margot W. Kaye

Abstract Background Prescribed fire in Eastern deciduous forests has been understudied relative to other regions in the United States. In Pennsylvania, USA, prescribed fire use has increased more than five-fold since 2009, yet forest response has not been extensively studied. Due to variations in forest composition and the feedback between vegetation and fire, Pennsylvania deciduous forests may burn and respond differently than forests across the eastern US. We measured changes in forest structure and composition up to eight years after prescribed fire in a hardwood forest of the Ridge and Valley region of the Appalachian Mountains in central Pennsylvania. Results Within five years post fire, tree seedling density increased more than 72% while sapling density decreased by 90%, midstory density decreased by 46%, and overstory response varied. Following one burn in the mixed-oak unit, overstory tree density decreased by 12%. In the aspen–oak unit, where pre-fire harvesting and two burns occurred, overstory tree density increased by 25%. Not all tree species responded similarly and post-fire shifts in species relative abundance occurred in sapling and seedling size classes. Abundance of red maple and cherry species decreased, whereas abundance of sassafras, quaking aspen, black oak, and hickory species increased. Conclusions Forest composition plays a key role in the vegetation–fire relationship and localized studies are necessary to measure forest response to prescribed fire. Compositional shifts in tree species were most pronounced in the aspen–oak unit where pre-fire overstory thinning and two prescribed fires were applied and significant structural changes occurred in all stands after just one burn. Increases in fire-tolerant tree species combined with reductions in fire-intolerant species highlight the role of prescribed fire in meeting management objectives such as altering forest structure and composition to improve game habitat in mid-Atlantic hardwood forests.


Fire Ecology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren V Austin ◽  
Alexander Silvis ◽  
Michael S Muthersbaugh ◽  
Karen E Powers ◽  
W Mark Ford

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Vaillant ◽  
Erin K. Noonan-Wright ◽  
Alicia L. Reiner ◽  
Carol M. Ewell ◽  
Benjamin M. Rau ◽  
...  

Altered fuel conditions coupled with changing climate have disrupted fire regimes of forests historically characterised by high-frequency and low-to-moderate-severity fire. Managers use fuel treatments to abate undesirable fire behaviour and effects. Short-term effectiveness of fuel treatments to alter fire behaviour and effects is well documented; however, long-term effectiveness is not well known. We evaluated surface fuel load, vegetation cover and forest structure before and after mechanical and fire-only treatments over 8 years across 11 National Forests in California. Eight years post treatment, total surface fuel load returned to 67 to 79% and 55 to 103% of pretreatment levels following fire-only and mechanical treatments respectively. Herbaceous or shrub cover exceeded pretreatment levels two-thirds of the time 8 years after treatment. Fire-only treatments warranted re-entry at 8 years post treatment owing to the accumulation of live and dead fuels and minimal impact on canopy bulk density. In general, mechanical treatments were more effective at reducing canopy bulk density and initially increasing canopy base height than prescribed fire. However, elevated surface fuel loads, canopy base height reductions in later years and lack of restoration of fire as an ecological process suggest that including prescribed fire would be beneficial.


2011 ◽  
Vol 261 (6) ◽  
pp. 989-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip J. van Mantgem ◽  
Nathan L. Stephenson ◽  
Eric Knapp ◽  
John Battles ◽  
Jon E. Keeley

Fire Ecology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Mark Ford ◽  
Alexander Silvis ◽  
Joshua B. Johnson ◽  
John W. Edwards ◽  
Milu Karp

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Schuler ◽  
Melissa Thomas Van-Gundy ◽  
Mary B. Adams ◽  
W. Mark. Ford

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Vaillant ◽  
Jo Ann Fites-Kaufman ◽  
Scott L. Stephens

Effective fire suppression and land use practices over the last century have altered forest structure and increased fuel loads in many forests in the United States, increasing the occurrence of catastrophic wildland fires. The most effective methods to change potential fire behavior are to reduce surface fuels, increase the canopy base height and reduce canopy bulk density. This multi-tiered approach breaks up the continuity of surface, ladder and crown fuels. Effectiveness of fuel treatments is often shown indirectly through fire behavior modeling or directly through monitoring wildland fire effects such as tree mortality. The present study investigates how prescribed fire affected fuel loads, forest structure, potential fire behavior, and modeled tree mortality at 90th and 97.5th percentile fire weather conditions on eight National Forests in California. Prescription burning did not significantly change forest structure at most sites. Total fuel loads (litter, duff, 1, 10, 100, and 1000-h) were reduced by 23 to 78% across the sites. The reduction in fuel loads altered potential fire behavior by reducing fireline intensity and increasing torching index and crowning index at most sites. Predicted tree mortality decreased after treatment as an effect of reduced potential fire behavior and fuel loads. To use limited fuel hazard reduction resources efficiently, more effort could be placed on the evaluation of existing fire hazards because several stands in the present study had little potential for adverse fire effects before prescribed fire was applied.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document