scholarly journals The value of external reviews in the secondary green bond market

2021 ◽  
pp. 102306
Author(s):  
Nagihan Simeth
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il Hwan Chung ◽  
◽  
Eung Gil Kim
Keyword(s):  

CFA Digest ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-20
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Latta
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 1988 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-46, 62-64
Author(s):  
William A. Trader
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 1987 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
William H. Pike
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2858-2878
Author(s):  
M.I. Emets

Subject. The article addresses the green bond pricing as compared to bonds other than green ones. Objectives. The aims are to determine how the fact that a bond is identified as a green one, the issue amount, and the availability of third-party verification, influence the yield to maturity; to make recommendations on effective green bond pricing. Methods. The study employs econometric testing of hypotheses, using the multiple linear regression. The sample includes 318 green and 1695 conventional bonds. Results. Green bonds have a lower yield to maturity in comparison with conventional bonds. The yield to maturity of green bonds with third-party verification is lower, as contrasted with green bonds without verification. Conclusions. The next step in the green bond market development is creating a benchmark yield curve for sovereign green bonds, with parallel issuance of conventional, non-green bonds. The yield curve is crucial for effective bond pricing. Two yield curves, i.e. for green and non-green bonds, will enable investors to estimate the fair price on issuance, as well as to define, if there is a difference in pricing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma Yudi Astuti ◽  
Asad Arsya Brilliant Fani

Sukuk and Bonds has differences and similarities. Fundamental differences between sukuk and bonds are first, underlying asset in every sukuk issuance, concept of profit loss sharing and the use of Islamic contracts. Whereas conducted research in practice of differences between sukuk and bonds are still an on-going discussion. This study aims to add the evidence in the discussion regarding whether there is differences between sukuk and bonds in the world of practice, provide investment preferences as well as educating investors in choosing sukuk or bonds as a sustainable and smooth instrument. The method used is Mann Whitney U-Test to test whether there is a different between yield to maturity (return) and standard deviation (risk) of both instruments. Using secondary data of Retail Sukuk (SR) and Retail Bonds (ORI) period 2008-2017 obtained from Indonesia Stock Exchange, Indonesia Bond Market Directory and Indonesia Bond Pricing Agency. The result shows that there is no significance difference of retail sukuk return and risk with retail bonds in Indonesia. Besides retail bonds are show higher return than retail sukuk because of higher coupon and longest mature date. While, retail sukuk is more stable rather than bonds as it backed up by the real underlying asset. Keywords: Retail Sukuk (SR), Retail Bonds (ORI), Yield to Maturity


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-338
Author(s):  
Minyeon Han ◽  
◽  
Jemoon Woo ◽  
Hyounggoo Kang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document