Equilibrium nickel isotope fractionation in nickel sulfide minerals

2018 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanqi Liu ◽  
Yongbing Li ◽  
Yiwen Ju ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Jianming Liu ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 136-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ratié ◽  
C. Quantin ◽  
D. Jouvin ◽  
D. Calmels ◽  
V. Ettler ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 476 ◽  
pp. 316-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lev J. Spivak-Birndorf ◽  
Shui-Jiong Wang ◽  
David L. Bish ◽  
Laura E. Wasylenki

2022 ◽  
Vol 317 ◽  
pp. 91-105
Author(s):  
Roberta Parigi ◽  
Ning Chen ◽  
Joel W. Reid ◽  
Carol J. Ptacek ◽  
David W. Blowes

2016 ◽  
Vol 451 ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather C. Watson ◽  
Frank Richter ◽  
Ankun Liu ◽  
Gary R. Huss

Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuyuan Zhang ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
Shanqi Liu ◽  
Peipei Yang ◽  
Yongbing Li

Nickel sulfide minerals, an important type of metal sulfides, are the major component of mantle sulfides. They are also one of the important windows for mantle partial melting, mantle metasomatism, and mantle fluid mineralization. The elasticity plays an important role in understanding the deformation and elastic wave propagation of minerals, and it is the key parameter for interpreting seismic wave velocity in terms of the composition of the Earth’s interior. Based on first-principles methods, the crystal structure, equation of state, elastic constants, elastic modulus, mechanical stability, elastic anisotropy, and elastic wave velocity of millerite (NiS), heazlewoodite (Ni3S2), and polydymite (Ni3S4) under high pressure are investigated. Our calculated results show that the crystal structures of these Ni sulfides are well predicted. These Ni sulfides are mechanically stable under the high pressure of the upper mantle. The elastic constants show different changing trends with increasing pressure. The bulk modulus of these Ni sulfides increases linearly with pressure, whereas shear modulus is less sensitive to pressure. The universal elastic anisotropic index AU also shows different changing trends with pressure. Furthermore, the elastic wave velocities of Ni sulfides are much lower than those of olivine and enstatite.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 464
Author(s):  
Peiyao Wang ◽  
Yaoling Niu ◽  
Pu Sun ◽  
Xiaohong Wang ◽  
Pengyuan Guo ◽  
...  

Many studies have shown that the average iron (Fe) isotope compositions of mantle-derived rocks, mantle peridotite and model mantle are close to those of chondrites. Therefore, it is considered that chondrite values represent the bulk Earth Fe isotope composition. However, this is a brave assumption because nearly 90% of Fe of the Earth is in the core, where its Fe isotope composition is unknown, but it is required to construct bulk Earth Fe isotope composition. We approach the problem by assuming that the Earth’s core separation can be approximated in terms of the Sudbury-type Ni-Cu sulfide mineralization, where sulfide-saturated mafic magmas segregate into immiscible sulfide liquid and silicate liquid. Their density/buoyancy controlled stratification and solidification produced net-textured ores above massive ores and below disseminated ores. The coexisting sulfide minerals (pyrrhotite (Po) > pentlandite (Pn) > chalcopyrite (Cp)) and silicate minerals (olivine (Ol) > orthopyroxene (Opx) > clinopyroxene (Cpx)) are expected to hold messages on Fe isotope fractionation between the two liquids before their solidification. We studied the net-textured ores of the Sudbury-type Jinchuan Ni-Cu sulfide deposit. The sulfide minerals show varying δ56Fe values (−1.37–−0.74‰ (Po) < 0.09–0.56‰ (Cp) < 0.53–1.05‰ (Pn)), but silicate minerals (Ol, Opx, and Cpx) have δ56Fe values close to chondrites (δ56Fe = −0.01 ± 0.01‰). The heavy δ56Fe value (0.52–0.60‰) of serpentines may reflect Fe isotopes exchange with the coexisting pyrrhotite with light δ56Fe. We obtained an equilibrium fractionation factor of Δ56Fesilicate-sulfide ≈ 0.51‰ between reconstructed silicate liquid (δ56Fe ≈ 0.21‰) and sulfide liquid (δ56Fe ≈ −0.30‰), or Δ56Fesilicate-sulfide ≈ 0.36‰ between the weighted mean bulk-silicate minerals (δ56Fe[0.70ol,0.25opx,0.05cpx] = 0.06‰) with weighted mean bulk-sulfide minerals (δ56Fe ≈ −0.30‰). Our study indicates that significant Fe isotope fractionation does take place between silicate and sulfide liquids during the Sudbury-type sulfide mineralization. We hypothesize that significant iron isotope fractionation must have taken place during core–mantle segregation, and the bulk Earth may have lighter Fe isotope composition than chondrites although Fe isotope analysis on experimental sulfide-silicate liquids produced under the varying mantle depth conditions is needed to test our results. We advocate the importance of further research on the subject. Given the close Fe-Ni association in the magmatic mineralization and the majority of the Earth’s Ni is also in the core, we infer that Ni isotope fractionation must also have taken place during the core separation that needs attention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document