scholarly journals Selecting submerged macrophyte species for replanting in Mediterranean eutrophic wetlands

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. e01349
Author(s):  
Maria A. Rodrigo ◽  
Nuria Carabal
Author(s):  
Jong-Yun Choi ◽  
Seong-Ki Kim ◽  
Kwang-Seuk Jeong ◽  
Gea-Jae Joo

AbstractMacrophytes determine the physical complexity of aquatic environments and provide a suitable habitat for colonization by microcrustaceans. We evaluated the effects of a seasonal growth pattern and structure of macrophyte species on epiphytic microcrustaceans collected from macrophyte surfaces (stems and leaves) in shallow wetlands from May 2011 to October 2012. In 2011, epiphytic microcrustaceans that preferred free-floating macrophytes (Spirodela polyrhiza and Salvinia natans) and submerged macrophytes (Potamogeton crispus and Ceratophyllum demersum) were affected by the seasonal growth of these species. Epiphytic microcrustaceans were abundant on the surface of Spirodela polyrhiza in June and August and on Salvinia natans in September and October. In 2012, epiphytic microcrustaceans preferred submerged macrophyte species over the free-floating ones. The results of stable isotope analysis showed that epiphytic microcrustaceans depend on epiphytic particulate organic matter (EPOM) from each macrophyte species rather than on suspended particulate organic matter. Small species (Coronatella rectangula, Pleuroxus laevis, and Chydorus sphaericus) used EPOM (dominated by epiphytic algae) on free-floating and submerged macrophyte species; however, relatively larger species (Ilyocryptus spinifer and Macrothrix rosea) used EPOM only from submerged macrophytes. Based on these findings, we conclude that the distribution of epiphytic microcrustaceans is determined by seasonal characteristics, morphology of macrophyte species, and abundance of food resources.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 539
Author(s):  
Chao Xu ◽  
Hai-Jun Wang ◽  
Qing Yu ◽  
Hong-Zhu Wang ◽  
Xiao-Min Liang ◽  
...  

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...]


2021 ◽  
pp. 117999
Author(s):  
Alberto MACEDA-VEIGA ◽  
Ralph MAC NALLY ◽  
Sara RODRÍGUEZ ◽  
Sandor SZABO ◽  
Edwin T.H.M. PEETERS ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHIJIANG LU ◽  
JIEMING LI ◽  
RYUHEI INAMORI ◽  
KAIQIN XU ◽  
NORIO SUGIURA ◽  
...  

Nematology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasna Vidaković ◽  
Goran Palijan

AbstractThe structural and functional diversity of epiphytic nematodes associated with the submerged macrophyte species, Ceratophyllum demersum, were investigated from July to September 2004 at three stations in the floodplain lake, Lake Sakadaš, Croatia. At stations I and II, C. demersum was dominant in the macrophyte patches. At station III, Myriophyllum spicatum was the dominant macrophyte species. When analysis of nematode species composition was done by grouping species with decreasing abundance, a community structure was evident on macrophytes that grew in different parts of the lake. When the abundance of nematodes was taken into account, C. demersum, which grew in different parts of the lake, was not associated with a unique nematode functional structure, and different trophic groups of nematodes were dominant at different stations. Eutobrilus nothus was the dominant nematode species for station I and chewers were the dominant functional group. Eutobrilus nothus, Eumonhystera sp. 1 and Eumonhystera filiformis vulgaris group were abundant nematode species for station II and consequently chewers and detritus feeders dominated at different periods of the investigation. Nematodes from station III were characterised by the highest nematode abundance where Chromadorina bioculata was the dominant species, and epistrate feeders were the dominant functional group. A part of our previously published results was reanalysed in this paper to enable comparison of nematode communities established on C. demersum with those developed on M. spicatum. There was no difference in the nematode functional structure between macrophyte species at the same station when the abundance of dominant species was taken into account, i.e., the same trophic structure was established.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document