Versatility of different melting temperature (Tm) calculator software for robust PCR and real-time PCR oligonucleotide design: A practical guide

Gene Reports ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Bakhtiarizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Javad Najaf-Panah ◽  
Hojatollah Mousapour ◽  
Seyed Alireza Salami
Gene ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Bakhtiarizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Javad Najaf Panah ◽  
Hojatollah Mousapour ◽  
Seyed Alireza Salami

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse L Montgomery ◽  
Carl T Wittwer

Abstract BACKGROUND Radioactive DNA polymerase activity methods are cumbersome and do not provide initial extension rates. A simple extension rate assay would enable study of basic assumptions about PCR and define the limits of rapid PCR. METHODS A continuous assay that monitors DNA polymerase extension using noncovalent DNA dyes on common real-time PCR instruments was developed. Extension rates were measured in nucleotides per second per molecule of polymerase. To initiate the reaction, a nucleotide analog was heat activated at 95 °C for 5 min, the temperature decreased to 75 °C, and fluorescence monitored until substrate exhaustion in 30–90 min. RESULTS The assay was linear with time for over 40% of the reaction and for polymerase concentrations over a 100-fold range (1–100 pmol/L). Extension rates decreased continuously with increasing monovalent cation concentrations (lithium, sodium, potassium, cesium, and ammonium). Melting-temperature depressors had variable effects. DMSO increased rates up to 33%, whereas glycerol had little effect. Betaine, formamide, and 1,2-propanediol decreased rates with increasing concentrations. Four common noncovalent DNA dyes inhibited polymerase extension. Heat-activated nucleotide analogs were 92% activated after 5 min, and hot start DNA polymerases were 73%–90% activated after 20 min. CONCLUSIONS Simple DNA extension rate assays can be performed on real-time PCR instruments. Activity is decreased by monovalent cations, DNA dyes, and most melting temperature depressors. Rational inclusion of PCR components on the basis of their effects on polymerase extension is likely to be useful in PCR, particularly rapid-cycle or fast PCR.


2015 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. 555 ◽  
Author(s):  
BVishnu Bhat ◽  
DBenet Bosco Dhas ◽  
AHiasindh Ashmi ◽  
SubashChandra Parija ◽  
N Banupriya

Author(s):  
Dyah Widiastuti ◽  
Agustiningsih Agustiningsih ◽  
Ihda Zuyina Ratna Sari ◽  
Tri Ramadhani

Detection of V1016G mutation is important for identifying the mechanism of  synthetic pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti population. The previous method has described an allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) using conventional PCR to detect the mutation. Although the method has great differentiating power and reproducibility, faster and more sensitive genotyping method is essential to accurately detect the mutation. This study evaluate the used of SYBR® Green real-time PCR and melting curve analysis (MCA) to identify the V1016G mutation. The collection of homozygous 1016G, heterozygous, and wild type (1016 V) mosquitoes DNA genome was extracted using genomic DNA mini kit. The SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix was used to identify alleles by real-time PCR followed melting curve analysis of the amplicons. Melting curve analysis produced reproducible results for the loci tested. The melting temperature was reached at 78.5 oC for homozygous 1016G mosquito and at 86 oC for wild type mosquito. Meanwhile, the heterozigous mosquito revealed two peaks of melting temperature at both 78.5 oC and 86 oC. These easily interpretable and distinguishable melting curve results were consistent with AS-PCR results obtained for the same alleles. The described MCA application for screening V1016G mutation is fast and widely accessible also could be implemented under field conditions


2013 ◽  
Vol 785-786 ◽  
pp. 550-555
Author(s):  
Fu Ming Sang ◽  
Yuan Sun ◽  
Zhong Xu ◽  
Yu Shi Wang ◽  
Zhi Zhou Zhang

Some carbon nanomaterials have been proved to be able to improve the PCR amplification efficiency. If used in quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), these nanomaterials must be tested whether fluorescence processing is interfered after they are added in the PCR system. In this study, 76 different carbon nanomaterials were tested in SYBR Green I-based qPCR, and the results demonstrated that about half carbon nanomaterials tested in this study could alter the PCR amplification profile probably due to the fluorescence quenching. Surprisingly, lower concentrations of nanomaterials led to more slight interference with the melting temperature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document