Dental care practices and oral health training for professional caregivers in long-term care facilities: An interdisciplinary approach to address oral health disparities

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richie Kohli ◽  
Sandra Nelson ◽  
Samantha Ulrich ◽  
Tony Finch ◽  
Karen Hall ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 164-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Amerine ◽  
Linda Boyd ◽  
Denise M. Bowen ◽  
Karen Neill ◽  
Tara Johnson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Julkunen ◽  
Kaija Hiltunen ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Riitta K. T. Saarela ◽  
Kaisu H. Pitkälä ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A growing number of older adults have natural teeth and are at high risk of oral diseases, which are induced by oral bacterial accumulation and proceed unnoticed and quietly. Our aim was (1) to examine the association of oral disease burden (ODB) with health and functioning among dentate long-term care residents, and (2) to find easily detectable signs for nurses to identify residents’ poor oral health. Methods In this cross-sectional observational study dentists examined 209 residents’ oral status, and nurses assessed residents for their functioning and nutrition in long-term care facilities in Helsinki, Finland. ODB was defined by asymptotic dental score (ADS). Six clinical signs of residents’ poor oral health were considered as potentially easy for nurses to detect: lesions on lips, teeth with increased mobility, lesions on oral mucosa, eating soft or pureed food, unclear speech, and needing assistance in eating. The association of these was tested with high ODB as outcome. Results Participants were grouped according to their ADS scores: low (n = 39), moderate (n = 96) and high ODB (n = 74). ODB was linearly associated with coronary artery disease and poor cognitive and physical functioning: needing assistance in eating, poor ability to make contact, and unclear speech but not with other diseases including dementia or demographic characteristics. Furthermore, ODB was linearly associated with eating soft or pureed food. Of the six selected, easily detectable signs, having at least two positive signs gave 89% sensitivity to detecting high ODB. Conclusion Poor oral health was common and ODB accumulated among residents with poor functioning. Nurses may use a few easily detectable signs to screen residents’ oral health when considering a resident’s need for consultation with an oral health professional.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e050289
Author(s):  
Lorrany Gabriela Rodrigues ◽  
Mario Vianna Vettore ◽  
Isadora Lemos Figueiredo ◽  
Aline Araújo Sampaio ◽  
Raquel Conceição Ferreira

IntroductionRegular oral health assessment among older adults living in long-term care facilities (LTCF) can improve their oral health. Different instruments have been developed and used to evaluate the oral health of institutionalised older people by non-dental professionals. These instruments must demonstrate adequate measurement properties. This systematic review aims to examine the studies describing the instruments employed to assess the oral health of older adults living in LTCF by non-dental professionals. The study will also evaluate the measurement properties of such instruments using the checklist proposed by the Consensus-based Standards to select health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).Methods and analysisStudies describing the development of instruments for assessing oral health of institutionalised older adults by non-dental professionals will be included. Studies assessing at least one measurement property (validity, reliability or responsiveness) will be also considered. Electronic searches will be conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS databases. Two independent reviewers will select the studies and will extract data concerning the characteristics of the research and the instrument. The measurement properties will be evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to grade the quality (or certainty) of evidence and strength of recommendations.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical approval is required. The results will be submitted for publication to a peer-review journal and presented at relevant conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020191479.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ina Schumann ◽  
Bernhard Albert Johannes Sobotta ◽  
Thomas Reiber ◽  
Ina Nitschke

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 1568-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélie Van Lancker ◽  
Sofie Verhaeghe ◽  
Ann Van Hecke ◽  
Katrien Vanderwee ◽  
Joline Goossens ◽  
...  

Gerodontology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Mello ◽  
Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann ◽  
Mario Brondani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document