scholarly journals 481 LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC SURVEILLANCE IN BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS PATIENTS WITH LOW-GRADE DYSPLASIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Klaver ◽  
K. Nadine Phoa ◽  
Frederike G. van Vilsteren ◽  
Bas L. Weusten ◽  
Raf Bisschops ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roos E. Pouw ◽  
Esther Klaver ◽  
K. Nadine Phoa ◽  
Frederike G. van Vilsteren ◽  
Bas L. Weusten ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. AB449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Yi N. Phoa ◽  
Roos E. Pouw ◽  
Frederike G. Van Vilsteren ◽  
Carine Sondermeijer ◽  
Fiebo J. Ten Kate ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagpal Singh Klair ◽  
Yousuf Zafar ◽  
Navroop Nagra ◽  
Arvind R. Murali ◽  
Mahendran Jayaraj ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a recommended treatment for Barrett’s esophagus with high grade dysplasia (BE-HGD) without a visible lesion which is managed by resection. However, currently there is no consensus on the management of BE with low grade dysplasia (BE-LGD) – RFA vs endoscopic surveillance. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these comparative studies to compare the risk of progression to HGD or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) among patients with BE-LGD treated with RFA vs endoscopic surveillance. METHODS: The primary outcome was to compare the risk of progression to HGD or EAC among patients with BE-LGD treated with RFA vs endoscopic surveillance. RESULTS: Four comparative studies reporting a total of 543 patients with BE-LGD were included in the meta-analysis (234 in RFA and 309 in endoscopic surveillance). The progression of BE-LGD to either HGD or EAC was significantly lower in patients treated with RFA compared to endoscopic surveillance (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.65, p=0.01). The progression to HGD alone was significantly lower in patients treated with RFA vs endoscopic surveillance (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.61, p=0.003). The progression to EAC alone was numerically lower in RFA compared to endoscopic surveillance without statistical significance (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.17-1.16, p=0.09). Moderate heterogeneity was noted in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our meta-analysis, there was a significant reduction in the risk of progression to HGD or EAC among patients with BE-LGD treated with RFA compared with those undergoing endoscopic surveillance. Endoscopic eradication therapy with RFA should be the preferred management approach for BE-LGD


2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 534-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parambir S. Dulai ◽  
Heiko Pohl ◽  
John M. Levenick ◽  
Stuart R. Gordon ◽  
Todd A. MacKenzie ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1483-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joerg Zehetner ◽  
Steven R. DeMeester ◽  
Shahin Ayazi ◽  
Jesse L. Costales ◽  
Florian Augustin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S456
Author(s):  
Sreekar Vennelaganti ◽  
Sravanthi Parasa ◽  
Prashanth Vennalaganti ◽  
Srinivas Gaddam ◽  
Manon Spaander ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M O’Byrne ◽  
Jolene Witherspoon ◽  
Roy J J Verhage ◽  
Marie O’Brien ◽  
Cian Muldoon ◽  
...  

Summary Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the main pathological precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or EAC from nondysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and indefinite for dysplasia (IND) varies widely between population-based studies and specialized centers for many reasons, principally the rigor of the biopsy protocol and the accuracy of pathologic definition. In the Republic of Ireland, a multicenter prospective registry and bioresource (RIBBON) was established in 2011 involving six academic medical centers, and this paper represents the first report from this network. A detailed clinical, endoscopic and pathologic database registered 3,557 patients. BE was defined strictly by both endoscopic evidence of Barrett’s epithelium and the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM). A prospective web-based database was used to gather information with initial and follow-up data abstracted by a data manager at each site. A total of 2,244 patients, 1,925 with no dysplasia, were included with complete follow-up. The median age at diagnosis was 60.5 with a 2.1:1 male to female ratio and a median follow-up time of 2.7 years (IQR 1.19–4.04), and 6609.25 person years. In this time period, 125 (5.57%) progressed to HGD/EAC, with 74 (3.3%) after 1 year of follow-up and 38 (1.69%) developed EAC, with 20 (0.89%) beyond 1 year. The overall incidence of HGD/EAC was 1.89% per year; 1.16% if the first year is excluded. The risk of progression to EAC alone overall was 0.57% per year, 0.31% excluding the first year, and 0.21% in the 1,925 patients who had SIM alone at diagnosis. Low-grade dysplasia (LGD) progressed to HGD/EAC in 31% of patients, a progression rate of 12.96% per year, 6.71% with the first year excluded. In a national collaboration of academic centers in Ireland, the progression rate for NDBE was similar to recent population studies. Almost one in two who progressed was evident within 1 year. Crucially, LGD diagnosed and confirmed by specialist gastrointestinal pathologists represents truly high-risk disease, highlighting the importance of expertise in diagnosis and management, and providing indirect support for ablative therapies in this context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document