scholarly journals Different risk factors between early and late cancer recurrences in patients without additional surgery after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Xu ◽  
Xiaowei Tang ◽  
Ningli Chai ◽  
Enqiang Linghu
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Su Chung ◽  
Hyun Sun Woo ◽  
Jun-Won Chung ◽  
Seok Hoo Jeong ◽  
Kwang An Kwon ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. E24-E29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamanouchi ◽  
Shinichi Ogata ◽  
Yasuhisa Sakata ◽  
Nanae Tsuruoka ◽  
Ryo Shimoda ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5768
Author(s):  
Sejin Lee ◽  
Jeong Ho Song ◽  
Sung Hyun Park ◽  
Minah Cho ◽  
Yoo Min Kim ◽  
...  

Background: Additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may be excessive as few patients have lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is necessary to develop a risk stratification system for LNM after non-curative ESD, such as the eCura system, which was introduced in the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. However, the eCura system requires venous and lymphatic invasion to be separately assessed, which is difficult to distinguish without special immunostaining. In this study, we practically modified the eCura system by classifying lymphatic and venous invasion as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Method: We retrospectively reviewed 543 gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy after non-curative ESD between 2006 and 2019. LNM was evaluated according to LVI as well as size >30 mm, submucosal invasion ≥500 µm, and vertical margin involvement, which were used in the eCura system. Results: LNM was present in 8.1% of patients; 3.6%, 2.3%, 7.4%, 18.3%, and 61.5% of patients with no, one, two, three, and four risk factors had LNM, respectively. The LNM rate in the patients with no risk factors (3.6%) was not significantly different from that in patients with one risk factor (2.3%, p = 0.523). Among patients with two risk factors, the LNM rate without LVI was significantly lower than with LVI (2.4% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.027). Among patients with three risk factors, the LNM rate without LVI was lower than with LVI (0% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.195), although not statistically significantly. Based on LNM rates according to risk factors, patients with LVI and other factors were assigned to the high-risk group (LNM, 17.4%) while other patients as a low-risk group (LNM, 2.4%). Conclusions: Modifying the eCura system by classifying lymphatic and venous invasion as LVI successfully stratified LNM risk after non-curative ESD. Moreover, the high-risk group can be simply identified based on LVI and the presence of other risk factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document