scholarly journals The multi-channel cochlear implant: Multi-disciplinary development of electrical stimulation of the cochlea and the resulting clinical benefit

2015 ◽  
Vol 322 ◽  
pp. 4-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme M. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Stimulation Of

Electrically Evoked Brainstem Responses in Cochlear Implant Recipients

1987 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Miyamoto ◽  
D. Douglas Brown
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Auditory Nerve ◽  
Clinical Applications ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Laboratory Setting ◽  
Recording Technique ◽  
Stimulus Artifact ◽  
Artifact Suppression ◽  
Stimulation Of

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf population through implanted cochlear prostheses has increased the need for reliable electrophysiologic assessment tools. We have recorded electrically evoked brainstem responses (EABRs) in 21 subjects who have received a 3M/House cochlear implant. Recordings have been made, both intraoperatively and postoperatively, in the laboratory setting. The recording technique, methods of stimulus artifact suppression, and results of our measurements are described. Clinical applications of this technology are suggested.

scholarly journals Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Carlyon ◽  
Olivier Macherey ◽  
Johan H. M. Frijns ◽  
Patrick R. Axon ◽  
Randy K. Kalkman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Acoustic Stimuli ◽  
Contralateral Ear ◽  
Stimulation Of

Optical Imaging of Cat Auditory Cortex Cochleotopic Selectivity Evoked by Acute Electrical Stimulation of a Multi-channel Cochlear Implant

1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert R. Dinse ◽  
Ben Godde ◽  
Thomas Hilger ◽  
Gunter Reuter ◽  
Sven M. Cords ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Auditory Cortex ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Optical Imaging ◽  
Stimulation Of

scholarly journals Programming a Cochlear Implant for Tinnitus Suppression

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (04) ◽  
pp. 302-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Perreau ◽  
Richard Tyler ◽  
Patricia C. Mancini
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Optimal Parameters ◽  
Research Designs ◽  
Optimal Programming ◽  
Stimulation Of ◽  
Research Studies

Abstract Background Electrical stimulation of the cochlea to treat tinnitus has been explored for decades. However, few studies have investigated the most salient programming parameters for tinnitus suppression in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Purpose The purpose of this study was to review the available CI programming parameters for tinnitus suppression and to consider possible clinical research designs for selecting the optimal programming parameters for CI patients. Results Across research studies, the optimal parameters vary significantly and are often based on data fromonly a fewparticipants. Electrical stimulation using lowand high rates, different electrode numbers, and low T-levels were helpful in suppressing tinnitus, although more research is needed from a greater number of CI patients. Possible designs for evaluating these parameters in a clinical setting are presented. Conclusions Programming a CI to reduce the prominence of tinnitus is complex, and audiologists should consider adjusting CI parameters systematically for CI patients with bothersome tinnitus.

scholarly journals Stapedial reflex elicited by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve in cochlear implant patients.

1989 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-80
Author(s):  
Kozo Kumakawa ◽  
Atsuko Manjyome ◽  
Hidehiko Takeda ◽  
Rie Ishii
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Acoustic Nerve ◽  
Stapedial Reflex ◽  
Stimulation Of
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document