scholarly journals A novel approach for knee osteoarthritis using high molecular weight hyaluronic acid conjugated to plasma fibrinogen – interim findings of a double-blind clinical study

Heliyon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. e04475
Author(s):  
Leonid Kandel ◽  
Gabriel Agar ◽  
Ori Elkayam ◽  
Aybek Sharipov ◽  
Omer Slevin ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. S503-S504
Author(s):  
C. Hummer ◽  
F. Angst ◽  
E. Schemitsch ◽  
C. Whittington ◽  
C. Manitt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hasan Bahrami ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat ◽  
Mohsen Cheraghi ◽  
Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan ◽  
Adel Ebrahimpour

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adel Ebrahimpour ◽  
Mohammad Hasan Bahrami ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat ◽  
Mohsen Cheraghi ◽  
Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan

Abstract Purpose To compare intra-articular (IA) knee injections of a cross-linked high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HMW-HA) with a linear low-molecular weight HA (LMW-HA) in terms of pain and functional improvement among knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients.Methods In this single-blinded RCT, the patients were randomly divided into two groups for HA injections. The first group received an HMW-HA (Arthromac) injection, while the other received three weekly LMW-HA (Hyalgan) injections. Pain and function were assessed using the outcome measures including WOMAC, Lequesne and VAS indices, once prior to injection, as well as 2 and 6 months after injections.Results A total of 90 patients were included. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics including age and sex between the two groups. Our analysis showed that total WOMAC, Lequesne and VAS mean scores remarkably improved at both follow-up time-points compared to the baseline measurements (p<0.001). There was no significant superiority between the two therapeutic protocols according to our outcome measures at any time-point of follow-up. The only except was about the improvement in WOMAC stiffness subscale that was significantly higher in LMW-HA group compared to HMW-HA (p=0.021). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in minor complications and injection-induced pain scores between the two groups.Conclusion This study proved that a single HMW-HA injection is as effective as multiple injections of LMW-HA counterparts in periods of 2 and 6 months follow-up.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hasan Bahrami ◽  
Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat ◽  
Mohsen Cheraghi ◽  
Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan ◽  
Adel Ebrahimpour

Abstract Purpose To compare intra-articular (IA) knee injections of a cross-linked high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HMW-HA) with a linear low-molecular weight HA (LMW-HA) in terms of pain and functional improvement among knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Methods In this single-blinded RCT, the patients were randomly divided into two groups for HA injections. The first group received an HMW-HA (Arthromac) injection, while the other received three weekly LMW-HA (Hyalgan) injections. Pain and function were assessed using the outcome measures including WOMAC, Lequesne and VAS indices, once prior to injection, as well as 2 and 6 months after injections. Results A total of 90 patients were included. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics including age and sex between the two groups. Our analysis showed that total WOMAC, Lequesne and VAS mean scores remarkably improved at both follow-up time-points compared to the baseline measurements (p<0.001). There was no significant superiority between the two therapeutic protocols according to our outcome measures at any time-point of follow-up. The only except was about the improvement in WOMAC stiffness subscale that was significantly higher in LMW-HA group compared to HMW-HA (p=0.021). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in minor complications and injection-induced pain scores between the two groups. Conclusion This study proved that a single HMW-HA injection is as effective as multiple injections of LMW-HA counterparts in periods of 2 and 6 months follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoyang Wang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Yongsheng Xu ◽  
Jianan Li ◽  
Kang Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundIntra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) has favorable effects on pain relief and knee function along with the low incidence of serious adverse reactions. Although various HA products are available for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, it is still controversial whether differences in HA products have any clinically significant difference in efficacy and safety. In light of the above, the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of biological fermentation–derived high-molecular-weight HA (NRD101) was investigated in a double-blind comparative manner in Chinese patients with knee osteoarthritis.MethodA multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active control, non-inferiority study was conducted in Chinese patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to receive five consecutive weekly injections of either NRD101 or Artz (a non-crosslinked low-molecular-weight HA derived from combs of roosters) followed by 4 weeks follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) NRS pain subscale score at Week 5. Secondary efficacy endpoints included WOMAC stiffness and physical function subscale score, local pain, range of joint motion, and overall improvement.ResultsAmong 267 randomized patients, 259 patients completed the study. The change from baseline in WOMAC NRS pain subscale score at Week 5 was −2.98 ± 0.193 in the NRD101 group and −2.66 ± 0.194 in the Artz group, and the trial met the non-inferiority criteria. Efficacy in the NRD101 group tended to be consistently higher than in the Artz group for most items of WOMAC. Several subgroup analyses also showed differences between the two groups, tending to favor NRD101. Adverse events were seen in 26.0% (34/131) of patients in the NRD101 group and 38.3% (51/133) in the Artz group.ConclusionsNRD101 improved knee pain in Chinese patients with osteoarthritis after five consecutive weekly injections. NRD101 tended to be somewhat more effective than Artz. No new safety concerns were identified.Trial registration: JapicCTI, JapicCTI-173531. Registered 10 March 2017, https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/cti-user/trial/Search.jsp


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Elmorsy ◽  
T. Funakoshi ◽  
F. Sasazawa ◽  
M. Todoh ◽  
S. Tadano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document