Automatic recognition of abnormal respiratory events during sleep by a pacemaker transthoracic impedance sensor in patients with and without sleep apnea

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. S246
Author(s):  
Margnerita Padeletti ◽  
Nicola Musilli ◽  
Giuseppe Ricciardi ◽  
Vito Altamura ◽  
Massimo Santini ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 1034-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
PASCAL DEFAYE ◽  
JEAN-LOUIS PEPIN ◽  
YANN POEZEVARA ◽  
PHILIPPE MABO ◽  
FRANCIS MURGATROYD ◽  
...  

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 842-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Defaye ◽  
Ines de la Cruz ◽  
Julio Martí-Almor ◽  
Roger Villuendas ◽  
Paul Bru ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 6888
Author(s):  
Georgia Korompili ◽  
Lampros Kokkalas ◽  
Stelios A. Mitilineos ◽  
Nicolas-Alexander Tatlas ◽  
Stelios M. Potirakis

The most common index for diagnosing Sleep Apnea Syndrome (SAS) is the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), defined as the average count of apnea/hypopnea events per sleeping hour. Despite its broad use in automated systems for SAS severity estimation, researchers now focus on individual event time detection rather than the insufficient classification of the patient in SAS severity groups. Towards this direction, in this work, we aim at the detection of the exact time location of apnea/hypopnea events. We particularly examine the hypothesis of employing a standard Voice Activity Detection (VAD) algorithm to extract breathing segments during sleep and identify the respiratory events from severely altered breathing amplitude within the event. The algorithm, which is tested only in severe and moderate patients, is applied to recordings from a tracheal and an ambient microphone. It proves good sensitivity for apneas, reaching 81% and 70.4% for the two microphones, respectively, and moderate sensitivity to hypopneas—approx. 50% were identified. The algorithm also presents an adequate estimator of the Mean Apnea Duration index—defined as the average duration of the detected events—for patients with severe or moderate apnea, with mean error 1.7 s and 3.2 s for the two microphones, respectively.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Hosoya ◽  
Hideki Kitaura ◽  
Takashi Hashimoto ◽  
Mau Ito ◽  
Masayuki Kinbara ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xin Lu ◽  
Wenhong Liu ◽  
Hui Wang

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Management of wake-up stroke (WUS) is always a challenge as no clear time of onset could be ascertained, and how to choose an appropriate therapy remains unclear. Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) has been regarded as a potential risk factor to WUS, yet no consensus was achieved. Motivated by the need for a deeper understanding of WUS and its association with sleep apnea, meta-analyses summarizing the available evidence of respiratory events and indices were conducted, and sensitivity analysis was also used for heterogeneity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Electronic databases were systematically searched, and cross-checking was done for relevant studies. Collected data included demographic characteristics, and sleep apnea parameters were extracted with stroke patients divided into WUS and NWUS groups. Clinical data of stroke patients accompanied with sleep apnea syndrome (OSA, SAS, and severe SAS) were also extracted for meta-analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis results showed that OSA, SAS, and severe SAS were significantly higher in WUS patients. A significantly higher AHI (WMD 7.74, 95% CI: 1.38–14.11; <i>p</i> = 0.017) and ODI (WMD of 3.85, 95% CI: 0.261–7.438; <i>p</i> = 0.035) than NWUS patients was also observed in the analysis of respiratory indices. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> WUS patients have severer SDB problems compared to NWUS patients suggesting that respiratory events during sleep might be underlying the induction of WUS. Besides, the induction of WUS was significantly associated with men rather than women. Therefore, early diagnosis and management of potential WUS patients should benefit from the detection of SDB status and respiratory effects.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A481-A482
Author(s):  
M Elizabeth C Hernandez ◽  
Kanta Velamuri

Abstract Introduction Central sleep apnea (CSA) syndrome is defined when five or more central apneas and/or hypopneas are present per hour of sleep, more than 50% of all respiratory events. CSA usually occur during NREM stage and rarely during REM. CSA is important to recognize because of complications ranging from frequent nighttime awakenings,sleepiness to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We present a 40 year old female patient with rare CSA during REM sleep and dream enactment. Report of Case 40yo African American female with history of loud snoring, witnessed sleep apnea, and daytime fatigue. She reported nightmares, sleep talking, and acting out her dreams without injury. Epworth sleepiness score was 5 /24. Her past medical history is significant for depression and anxiety. She has no history of head trauma, no neurologic or cardiovascular disorders. Her medications include fluoxetine and,quetiapine. She denied substance use, narcotic use, or alcohol use. Her level 1 sleep study showed predominantly REM-associated central sleep apneas which is rare. She also was observed to have loss of REM sleep muscle atonia suggestive of REM Behavior disorder. Her sleep architecture was atypical with decreased N3 sleep stage. REM sleep duration was adequate. She was noted to have loss of REM muscle atonia based on AASM guidelins elevated chin EMG, excessive transient muscle activity, and witnessed movement during REM stage via video monitoring. During the study, she had an apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of 13.1 per hour of sleep, Central apneas were predominantly noted during REM stage, 10 per hour, comprised of 50% of her respiratory events. The minimum SpO2 value with CSA was 94%. She had normal sinus rhythm. Her sleep was fragmented. A total arousals were 28.4/hour,and 7.9/hour were respiratory arousals, and the rest were spontaneous arousals. An echocardiogram showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction of 55 to 60 %. Her room air arterial blood gas was normal with PaC02 of 37 mmHg. MRI of the brain/brainstem was ordered given her atypical REM sleep. She had no acute intracranial abnormalities. There is a non specific finding of a low lying cerebellar tonsils without evidence of Chiari I malformation. Conclusion Our patient has rare idiopathic central apnea in REM stage and is third case reported. She also has loss of muscle atonia during REM with dream enactment which is also rare in her age group. Injury precaution advised.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A405-A406
Author(s):  
W A Youngren ◽  
K Miller

Abstract Introduction The enigmatic nature of Posttrauma Nightmares (PTNs) has left research without an agreed upon operational definition. This is partially due to PTNs often containing well remembered content that is similar to the triggering trauma, but also manifesting as severe nighttime awakenings without a concise or remembered dream narrative. Given that recent research has linked episodes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) to PTNs, this study aimed to examine if OSA could explain why some distressed awakenings occur without memory of nightmare content. Methods Participants included 36 trauma survivors who reported experiencing PTNs, recruited from a clinical referral or at a Veterans Affairs Hospital. Presence of OSA was captured from self-reports of previous polysomnography-based sleep study results. PTNs were measured via a self-report measure that assessed past month nightmare frequency and if the content was remembered upon awakening. Analysis included descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results Out of the group with a reported diagnosis of OSA (N = 8), 75% (n = 6) reported they did not remember the content of their nightmares upon awakening, whereas out of the group without a reported OSA diagnosis (N = 28), only 4% of participants (n = 1) reported not remembering the content of their nightmares. There was a significant difference between OSA diagnosis and remembering nightmare content (X2 = 57.83, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Individuals with diagnosed OSA commonly experienced nightmares that were often not remembered upon awakening, while the group without OSA most often remembered the content of their nightmares. Due to this relationship, it is possible that some PTNs experienced by the OSA group may instead be misinterpreted respiratory events. Understanding the relationship between OSA and PTNs is crucial for developing the most effective treatment course. Support None.


2006 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S108
Author(s):  
J.M. Montserrat ◽  
M. Nacher ◽  
A. Serrano ◽  
D Navajas ◽  
R. Farre

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A172-A173
Author(s):  
J Thybo ◽  
A N Olesen ◽  
M Olsen ◽  
E Leary ◽  
P Arnal ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Evaluation of sleep apnea involves manual annotation of Polysomnography (PSG) file, a time-consuming process subject to interscorer variations. The DOSED algorithm has been shown to be helpful in detecting Central Sleep Apnea (CSA), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), and Hypopnea when merged into a single event type. This work uses a modified version of DOSED capable of detecting each event type separately. Methods The network consists of 3 blocks of 1D convolutional layers followed by 6 blocks of 2D convolutional layers. The network has 2 classification layers, one determines the probability of each class, and the other determines the start and duration time of the event with the highest probability. Four channels from nasal and mouth airflow and position of abdomen and thorax are used as input to the model. The model was trained using 2800 PSG from 4 different cohorts (MESA, MROS, SSC, WSC) and tested on 70 PSG, which have been scored by six technicians (Stanford, U Penn, St Louis). Results On an event by event basis, model F1-scores versus a weighted consensus score based on 6 technicians were 0.60 for OSA, 0.43 for CSA, and 0.34 for Hypopnea. Average F1-scores for the 6 technicians were 0.48 (std 0.04) for OSA, 0.29 (std 0.145) for CSA, and 0.54 (std 0.183) for Hypopnea, indicating that the model functions better on an event-by-event basis than an average technician. Correlations between indices/hr for central apnea, obstructive apnea, and hypopnea indicate excellent correlations for apneas, but poor correlation for hypopnea. We are now adding the snoring channel to explore if predictions can be improved. Conclusion The result shows that deep learning-based models can detect respiratory events with an accuracy similar to technicians. The poor agreement between technicians from different universities indicates that we need better definitions of hypopnea. Support  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document