It is time for catheter ablation to be considered a first-line treatment option in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 658-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mobin Kheirkhahan ◽  
Nassir F. Marrouche
Author(s):  
Ibrahim El Masri ◽  
Sharif M Kayali ◽  
Theodore Manolukas ◽  
Yehoshua C. Levine

EP Europace ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattias Aronsson ◽  
Håkan Walfridsson ◽  
Magnus Janzon ◽  
Ulla Walfridsson ◽  
Jens Cosedis Nielsen ◽  
...  

Aim The aim of this prospective substudy was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) with radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) compared with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as first-line treatment. Methods and results A decision-analytic Markov model, based on MANTRA-PAF (Medical Antiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) study data, was developed to study long-term effects and costs of RFA compared with AADs as first-line treatment. Positive clinical effects were found in the overall population, a gain of an average 0.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to an incremental cost of €3033, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €50 570/QALY. However, the result of the subgroup analyses showed that RFA was less costly and more effective in younger patients. This implied an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €3434/QALY in ≤50-year-old patients respectively €108 937/QALY in >50-year-old patients. Conclusion Radiofrequency catheter ablation as first-line treatment is a cost-effective strategy for younger patients with paroxysmal AF. However, the cost-effectiveness of using RFA as first-line therapy in older patients is uncertain, and in most of these AADs should be attempted before RFA (MANTRA-PAF ClinicalTrials.gov number; NCT00133211).


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 384
Author(s):  
Rhanderson Cardoso ◽  
Gustavo B. Justino ◽  
Leonardo Knijnik ◽  
Leticia B.C. Soares ◽  
Luana M.F. Sanchez ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vedran Velagic ◽  
NIkola Pavlovic ◽  
Gian-Battista Chierchia ◽  
Jean-Sylvain Hermida ◽  
Stewart Healey ◽  
...  

Introduction: Early catheter ablation (CA) may increase procedure efficacy and reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) disease progression. Cryo-FIRST (NCT01803438) evaluated whether pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon CA is superior to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy as a first-line treatment for the prevention of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF). Methods: Patients with symptomatic PAF, free of heart disease and not administered an AAD for >48 hours were enrolled at 18 sites in 9 countries, randomized (1:1) to cryoballoon CA (Arctic Front Advance, Medtronic) or AAD therapy (Class IC or III). Using a 90-day blanking period, subjects were followed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months by 7-day Holter monitoring. Primary endpoint failure was defined as AAR lasting >30 s. Safety was evaluated by comparing the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Palpitations were monitored by a patient diary. Results: Of the 218 randomized subjects (age 52±13 years, 68% male), 187 (86%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Crossovers occurred in 20 subjects (9%; 1 subject from CA-to-AAD and 19 from AAD-to-CA). By intention-to-treat analysis, freedom from AAR after blanking was achieved in 82.2% of subjects in the cryoballoon CA arm and 67.6% of subjects in the AAD arm (HR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.86; P =0.013). There were no group differences in the time-to-first SAEs (HR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.46-1.26; P =0.28), and there was no death, atrio-esophageal fistula, pericardial tamponade, or stroke reported during the study. Also, there was no phrenic nerve injury present at the time of hospital discharge. The incidence rate of symptomatic palpitations after the 3 month follow-up was lower in the cryoballoon CA (4.61 days/year) compared to the AAD arm (15.18 days/year; IRR=0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.58; P<0.001) with a mean duration [min]of 54.4 (131.1) for CA and 102.7 (162.8) for AAD. Conclusions: Cryoballoon CA was superior to AAD for the prevention of AAR in treatment naïve patients with PAF, and CA was associated with less frequent symptom recurrence. Moreover, CA had a safety profile comparable to AAD therapy. These results suggest cryoballoon CA is an effective first-line treatment for patients with symptomatic PAF.


Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2021-319496
Author(s):  
Jacopo F Imberti ◽  
Wern Yew Ding ◽  
Agnieszka Kotalczyk ◽  
Juqian Zhang ◽  
Giuseppe Boriani ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation (CA) compared with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as first-line treatment for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials identified using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Embase published between 01/01/2000 and 19/03/2021. The primary efficacy endpoint was the first documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmias following the blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of all serious adverse events (SAEs).ResultsFrom 441 records, 6 studies met the inclusion criteria. 609 patients received CA, while 603 received AAD therapy. 212/609 patients in the CA group had a recurrence of atrial arrhythmias as compared with 318/603 in the AADs group resulting in a 36% relative risk reduction (risk ratio: 0.64, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.80, p<0.01). The risk of all SAEs was not statistically different between CA and AAD (0.87, 0.58 to 1.30, p=0.49); 107/609 SAE in the CA group vs 126/603 in the AAD group. Both recurrence of symptomatic atrial arrhythmias (109/505 vs 186/504) and healthcare utilisation (126/397 vs 185/394) were significantly lower in the CA group (0.53, 0.35 to 0.79 and 0.65, 0.48 to 0.89, respectively). There was a 79% reduction in the crossover rate during follow-up among patients randomised to CA compared with AAD (0.21, 0.13 to 0.32, p<0.01).ConclusionsFirst-line treatment with CA is superior to AAD therapy in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF, as it significantly reduces the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmias and symptomatic atrial arrhythmias, and healthcare resource utilisation with comparable safety profile.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document