Methane mitigation in ruminants by dietary means: The role of their methane emission from manure

2006 ◽  
Vol 1293 ◽  
pp. 199-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kreuzer ◽  
I.K. Hindrichsen
AGU Advances ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinfeng Chang ◽  
Shushi Peng ◽  
Yi Yin ◽  
Philippe Ciais ◽  
Petr Havlik ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 1427-1438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karri Satyanagalakshmi ◽  
Goud Talla Sridhar ◽  
S. K. Sirohi

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
James Temitope Dada ◽  
Folorunsho Monsur Ajide ◽  
Akinwumi Sharimakin

PurposeThis study investigates the effect of shadow economy on environmental pollution and the role of institutional quality in moderating the impact in African countries between 1991 and 2015.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs three pollutant variables namely: carbon dioxide emissions per capita, methane emission and nitrous oxide emission as robustness check. Also, battery of methodologies; ordinary least squares, fixed effects and system generalised method of moments are used to drive out the conclusions of this study.FindingsThe findings reveal that shadow economy and institutional quality contribute significantly to environmental pollution in Africa. Further, the interactive effect of shadow economy and institutional quality worsens environmental quality in the region. This reveals that weak institutional quality recorded in the region increases the level of shadow economy, thereby intensifying environmental pollution.Practical implicationsThe study concludes that weak institutional framework in the region reinforces shadow economy and environmental pollution. Hence, findings from this study can help policymakers in the region to better understand the role of institutional quality in reducing shadow economy and environmental pollution.Originality/valueThis study enriches one’s understanding on the role of institutional quality in the relationship between environmental quality and shadow economy in African context. It investigates the direct and indirect impact of institutions and shadow economy on environmental quality. The study also uses three different robust variables to measure environmental pollution (carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per capita, methane emission and nitrous oxide emission) for sensitivity analysis.


Author(s):  
T. Wagatsuma ◽  
T. Nakashima ◽  
K. Tawaraya ◽  
S. Watanabe ◽  
A. Kamio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinfeng CHANG ◽  
Shushi Peng ◽  
Yi Yin ◽  
Philippe Ciais ◽  
Petr Havlik ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eman Pourkhiz ◽  
Seyed J.F. Hosseini ◽  
Seyed V. Alavi ◽  
Farhad L. Ara

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangjie Li ◽  
Dongqi Wang ◽  
Zhenlou Chen ◽  
Haiyan Jin ◽  
Hong Hu ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2023
Author(s):  
Theivasigamani Parthasarathi ◽  
Koothan Vanitha ◽  
Sendass Mohandass ◽  
Eli Vered

Background: Rice farming faces major challenges, including water limitation, drought and climate change in the current scenario of agriculture. Among the innovative water-saving techniques, drip irrigation is a forerunner, with maximized water-saving potential, increased grain yield and methane mitigation. Methods: A field experiment was conducted comprising four different drip irrigation practices: (i) sub-surface drip irrigation (SDI) with 1.0 litre per hour (lph) discharge rate emitters (DRE) (SDI+1.0 lph DRE) (ii) SDI+0.6 lph DRE, (iii) surface drip irrigation (DI) with 1.0 lph discharge rate emitters (DI+1.0 lph DRE), (iv) DI+0.6 lph DRE and were compared with (v) a conventional flood aerobic irrigation (considered conventional). Results: The estimated grain yield of rice was found to be 23.5%, 20.3%, and 15.1% higher under SDI+1.0 lph DRE, SDI+0.6 lph DRE and DI+1.0 lph DRE practices, respectively, than the conventional method. A water saving of 23.3% was also observed for all drip practices compared with conventional practices. Seasonal methane emission flux declined 78.0% in the drip methods over the conventional irrigation: better mitigation than previously reported values (alternate wetting and drying (47.5%) and system of rice intensification (29.0%) practices). Continuous soil aeration and enhanced soil methanotrophs (P<0.05) limit the peak methane emission in rice during the flowering phase in drip irrigation, which is reflected in the methane emission flux values. Consequently, the equivalent CO2 (CO2-eq) emissions and yield-scaled CO2 eq-emission were found to be significantly lower in SDI (43.8% and 49.5%, respectively), and DI (25.1% and 26.7%, respectively) methods as compared with the conventional that ensures better methane mitigation and future climate-smart rice production systems. Conclusions: Drip irrigation could reduce the cumulative methane emission in aerobically grown rice. SDI + 1.0 lph DRE practice can be applied in areas with inadequate water availability and effective in reducing the CO2-eq emission with better yield than conventional.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document