Low-level vagus nerve stimulation: An important therapeutic option for atrial fibrillation treatment via modulating cardiac autonomic tone

2015 ◽  
Vol 199 ◽  
pp. 437-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxian Chen ◽  
Lilei Yu ◽  
Xiaoya Zhou ◽  
Qiming Liu ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 929-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Stavrakis ◽  
Mary Beth Humphrey ◽  
Benjamin Scherlag ◽  
Omer Iftikhar ◽  
Purvi Parwani ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 867-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stavros Stavrakis ◽  
Mary Beth Humphrey ◽  
Benjamin J. Scherlag ◽  
Yanqing Hu ◽  
Warren M. Jackman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yankai Guo ◽  
Jiasuoer Xiaokereti ◽  
Qingjun Meng ◽  
Guiqiu Cao ◽  
Huaxin Sun ◽  
...  

Background: Previous studies have proved that low-level vagus nerve stimulation (LLVS) could suppress acute obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF).Objective: This study investigates the underlying electrophysiological, neural, and cardiomyocyte injury mechanisms on acute OSA-induced AF, examining whether LLVS can attenuate or reverse this remodeling.Methods and Results: Eighteen mongrel dogs received endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia and were randomly divided into three groups: the OSA group (simulated OSA with clamping of the trachea cannula at the end of expiration for 2min followed ventilation 8min, lasting 6h, n=6), the OSA+LLVS group (simulated OSA plus LLVS, n=6), and a control group (sham clamping the trachea cannula without stimulation, n=6). In the OSA+LLVS group, the atrial effective refractory period was significantly lengthened while the sinus node recovery time and AF duration decreased after the 4th hour, and the expression level of Cx40 and Cx43 was significantly increased compared to the OSA group. Norepinephrine, TH, and ChAT were significantly decreased in the OSA+LLVS group compared with the OSA group. Mitochondrial swelling, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and glycogen deposition, along with a higher concentration of TNF-α, IL-6 were observed in the OSA group, and the LLVS inhibited the structural remodeling and expression of inflammatory cytokines.Conclusion: LLVS decreased the inducibility of AF partly by ameliorating sympathetic hyperactivity and atrial myocyte injury after acute OSA-induced AF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Pérez-Carbonell ◽  
Howard Faulkner ◽  
Sean Higgins ◽  
Michalis Koutroumanidis ◽  
Guy Leschziner

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulatory therapeutic option for drug-resistant epilepsy. In randomised controlled trials, VNS implantation has resulted in over 50% reduction in seizure frequency in 26%–40% of patients within 1 year. Long-term uncontrolled studies suggest better responses to VNS over time; however, the assessment of other potential predictive factors has led to contradictory results. Although initially designed for managing focal seizures, its use has been extended to other forms of drug-resistant epilepsy. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the use of VNS, its impact on seizure frequency and quality of life, and common adverse effects of this therapy. We also include practical guidance for the approach to and the management of patients with VNS in situ.


2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo S. Meneses ◽  
Samanta F. B. Rocha ◽  
Cristiane Simão ◽  
Heraldo Nei Hardt Laroca dos Santos ◽  
Cleudi Pereira ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Refractory epilepsy accounts for 20 to 30% of epilepsy cases and remains a challenge for neurologists. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an option for palliative treatment. OBJECTIVE: It was to study the efficacy and tolerability of VNS in patients implanted with a stimulator at the Curitiba Institute of Neurology (INC). METHODS: A case study of six patients with refractory epilepsy submitted to a VNS procedure at the INC in the last four years was described and discussed. RESULTS: Mean age at time of implantation was 29 years. Mean follow-up was 26.6 months. Seizure frequency decreased in all patients (40-50% (n=2) and >80% (n=4)). Three patients no longer required frequent hospitalizations. Two patients previously restricted to wheelchairs started to walk, probably because of improved mood. CONCLUSION: In this population, VNS proved to be a sound therapeutic option for treating refractory epilepsy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document