Austin Cardiology
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Published By Austin Publishing Group

2578-0913

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuf J ◽  
◽  
Mukhopadhyay S ◽  
Viadya PN ◽  
Gautam A ◽  
...  

Background: Left Ventricular Negative Remodeling (LVNR) following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) is an important cause of LV systolic dysfunction due to Irreversible Myocardial Injury (IMI). Both necrosis and apoptosis contribute to IMI and LVNR. We assessed the role of specific apoptotic marker M30 in predicting LVNR in patients of anterior wall ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI within 12 hours of symptom onset. Methods: This prospective study was done on 100 consecutive patients of anterior wall STEMI (87 men and 13 women, mean age 52.15±12.08 years) meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Blood sample for M30 was drawn at 24 hours after symptom onset, when it reaches peak level. Transthoracic echo was done in each patient at 24 hours after PPCI and at 6 months. LVNR was defined as ≥20% increase in LV end diastolic volume at 6 months after PPCI. Results: 44 patients (44%) developed LVNR at 6 months post PPCI. Diabetes mellitus (p=0.032), symptom onset to balloon time (p=0.059), CPK-MB (p=0.007) and M30 level (p=0.012) were independent predictors of LVNR. The cutoff value of M30 for predicting LVNR was 81.18u/ml with positive predictive value of 70.4% (AUC 85.3, p<0.001). Conclusion: In patients of anterior wall STEMI undergoing PPCI, the apoptotic marker M30 is useful for early prediction of LVNR. This can assist in better risk stratification of patients after successful PPCI and identify the subgroup of patients who require more intensive medical follow up with antiremodeling drugs to attenuate the development of LVNR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen LQ ◽  
◽  
Marfatia R ◽  
Burkowski J ◽  
Rapelje K ◽  
...  

Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) is well established for Chest Pain (CP) evaluation to assess coronary artery stenosis. However, the appropriateness of CCTA for COVID-19 patients with CP is unclear because a cardiac cause of CP in COVID-19 patients can be multifactorial, from direct viral myocardial injury to secondary hypercoagulability and to coronary stenosis [1]. The purpose of this report is to examine the appropriateness of CCTA for CP evaluation in laboratory confirmed COVID-19 patients. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive COVID-19 patients with CP between March 7, 2020 and January 2021. COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed using the Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test (Cobas SARS-CoV-2, Roche, Indiana, USA and the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2, Cepheid, California, USA). A waiver for individual consent was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patient’s demographic data, vital signs and ECG were charted prospectively in the CT reporting database. The laboratory results were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records. The European Consortium clinical pre-test probability score for coronary artery disease was calculated based from the clinical criteria including age, sex, CP type, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, hypertension, and dyslipidemia [2] where the low pretest probability was defined as <5%, intermediate probability 5-70 % and high probability >70%. Patients less than 40 years old (N=3) were treated as if they were 40 years of age in order to calculate their score. The score was calculated to predict coronary stenosis >50% by CCTA, which was performed using a 320-detector CT (Acquilion One, Vision, Canon, USA) with prospective ECG gating. Among 40 patients studied, 21 were female and the mean age was 53 years. Of those, 34 were hospitalized and 6 were outpatients. The patients’ demographics are shown in the table. No patient was known to have pre-existing coronary artery disease. Based on the clinical criteria there were 11 patients having low pretest probability <5% and the remaining 29 having intermediate probability ranging from 5% to 47%. None had high pretest probability. All patient had 12-lead ECG prior to CCTA. ST/T wave abnormalities were found in 14 (35%) and Q wave abnormality in 5 (13%) patients. Of the 32 patients who had Troponin tested, only 1 patient had Troponin I elevation. Out of the 38 patients with calcium score imaging performed, 23 (61%) had zero calcium score. To minimize radiation exposure 2 patients did not receive calcium score imaging due to young age (<30 years). The subsequent CCTA was normal in one and severely abnormal with 3-vessel disease in the other. Among the patients with low pretest probability (N=11) none had significant coronary stenosis of >50%. Of the remaining 29 patients with intermediate probability, 8 (28%) had significant stenosis. One female patient having an intermediate pre-test probability of 11% presented with an acute coronary syndrome with ST segment depression and peak cardiac Troponin-I elevation of 11.3 ng/dL. Her coronary calcium score was zero and CCTA was normal. The subsequent cardiac MRI showed acute myocardial infarction with evidence of microvascular obstruction. Another patient having intermediate probability of 47% had a coronary calcium score of 5717 who was imputed to have significant coronary stenosis without undergoing CCTA. The ECG findings of ST/T or Q wave abnormalities did not differentiate those with or without significant coronary stenosis by CCTA. Table 1: Demographics (N=40). In this case series we found that clinical risk stratification using The European Consortium pre-test probability score was effective in COVID-19 patients with CP. No patients with low pretest probability were found to have significant coronary stenosis. In contrast, 28% of patients with intermediate pretest probability had significant coronary stenosis. While fever and respiratory distress are often the most prominent clinical presentations for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, CP can also present as a major complaint or in combination with other symptoms, making the clinical assessment difficult based on symptoms alone. There are many possible cardiac causes for CP, including but not limited to acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis and pericarditis in COVID-19 patients. Even in the setting of STelevation acute myocardial infarction the absence of obstructive coronary disease is common by invasive angiography in COVID-19 patients [3]. Therefore, it is challenging to choose the appropriate diagnostic test for CP evaluation in COVID-19 patients. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that the clinical risk stratification combined with CCTA remains to be appropriate and effective for coronary artery disease evaluation in COVID-19 patients with CP.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Schulte Hermes M ◽  
◽  
Klein Wiele O ◽  
Schulte PC ◽  
Seyfarth M ◽  
...  

Background: Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a well-documented independent risk factor for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) that also affects the lipid and coagulation systems. Nevertheless, the influence of Lp (a) on the manifestation of restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is not fully explored. We investigate Lp (a), fibrinogen, and plasminogen levels pre- and post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) to assess interaction of Lp (a) with the coagulation system. Methods: Patients with CAD and PCI with bare metal stents were recruited between August 1998 and June 1999. Blood samples to measure Lp (a), plasminogen, and fibrinogen were taken pre-PCI, immediately after PCI, and on days one and three after PCI. Patients were followed up after six months by scheduled Coronary Angiogram (CAG). Results: A total of 89 patients were recruited, 81 of which were examined by CAG, and 28 had restenosis after PCI (34.5%). Following PCI, patients with restenosis had a larger decrease in Lp (a) levels and fibrinogen neither of both had reached baseline by day three (Lp (a) p=0.008, fibrinogen p=0.0121). Conclusions: From the fact that neither Lp (a), nor fibrinogen, or plasminogen had returned to baseline levels by day three after PCI, we hypothesise that there may exist a bridge between Lp (a) and the thrombosis and fibrinolysis pathways at the site of vascular injury after PCI which promotes restenosis after PCI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dogosh AA ◽  
◽  
El Nasasra A ◽  
Zahger D ◽  
Cafri C ◽  
...  

Background: Lidocaine has been commonly used in many clinical settings. Nonetheless, systemic toxicity can be life-threatening and careful attention to dosing, especially among patients with liver dysfunction is important to minimize the risk of toxicity. Objective: The diagnosis of lidocaine toxicity is usually clinical, while rare, but may prove fatal. Methods: Here we discuss 60 years-old man with advanced liver cirrhosis, developed lidocaine-induced cardiovascular and neurotoxicity. Results: Our case study demonstrates a successful treatment of cardiovascular and neurotoxicity with intravenous lipid emulsion in the context of systemic lidocaine toxicity in a liver cirrhosis patient who received lidocaine as a local anesthetic. Conclusions: A high index of suspicion should be maintained for severe toxicity even after subcutaneous administration and prompt intralipid administration may prove lifesaving.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murali P Vettath

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document