Determinants of outcome in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction & secondary mitral regurgitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 323 ◽  
pp. 229-234
Author(s):  
Athina Chasapi ◽  
Nikos Karogiannis ◽  
Spyridon Zidros ◽  
Kush Patel ◽  
Guy Lloyd ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. 785-787
Author(s):  
M. Dolores García-Cosío Carmena ◽  
Eulalia Roig Minguell ◽  
Andreu Ferrero-Gregori ◽  
Rafael Vázquez García ◽  
Juan Delgado Jiménez ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n1421
Author(s):  
Philipp E Bartko ◽  
Gregor Heitzinger ◽  
Noemi Pavo ◽  
Maria Heitzinger ◽  
Georg Spinka ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To define prevalence, long term outcome, and treatment standards of secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) across the heart failure spectrum. Design Large scale cohort study. Setting Observational cohort study with data from the Viennese community healthcare provider network between 2010 and 2020, Austria. Participants 13 223 patients with sMR across all heart failure subtypes. Main outcome measures Association between sMR and mortality in patients assigned by guideline diagnostic criteria to one of three heart failure subtypes: reduced, mid-range, and preserved ejection fraction, was assessed. Results Severe sMR was diagnosed in 1317 patients (10%), correlated with increasing age (P<0.001), occurred across the entire spectrum of heart failure, and was most common in 656 (25%) of 2619 patients with reduced ejection fraction. Mortality of patients with severe sMR was higher than expected for people of the same age and sex in the same community (hazard ratio 7.53; 95% confidence interval 6.83 to 8.30, P<0.001). In comparison with patients with heart failure and no/mild sMR, mortality increased stepwise with a hazard ratio of 1.29 (95% confidence interval 1.20 to 1.38, P<0.001) for moderate and 1.82 (1.64 to 2.02, P<0.001) for severe sMR. The association between severe sMR and excess mortality was consistent after multivariate adjustment and across all heart failure subgroups (mid-range ejection fraction: hazard ratio 2.53 (95% confidence interval 2.00 to 3.19, P<0.001), reduced ejection fraction: 1.70 (1.43 to 2.03, P<0.001), and preserved ejection fraction: 1.52 (1.25 to 1.85, P<0.001)). Despite available state-of-the-art healthcare, high volume heart failure, and valve disease programmes, severe sMR was rarely treated by surgical valve repair (7%) or replacement (5%); low risk transcatheter repair (4%) was similarly seldom used. Conclusion Secondary mitral regurgitation is common overall, increasing with age and associated with excess mortality. The association with adverse outcome is significant across the entire heart failure spectrum but most pronounced in those with mid-range and reduced ejection fractions. Despite these poor outcomes, surgical valve repair or replacement are rarely performed; similarly, low risk transcatheter repair, specifically in the heart failure subsets with the highest expected benefit from treatment, is seldom used. The current data suggest an increasing demand for treatment, particularly in view of an expected increase in heart failure in an ageing population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kashish Goel ◽  
Colin M Barker ◽  
JoAnn Lindenfeld

Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is a common occurrence in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Moderate-severe or severe SMR is associated with increased mortality and hospitalisations from heart failure. Medical and cardiac resynchronisation therapies have been the only treatments proven to improve prognosis in this patient population. The Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy (COAPT) and the Percutaneous Repair with the MitraClip Device for Severe Functional/Secondary Mitral Regurgitation (MITRA-FR) RCTs evaluated transcatheter mitral valve repair with MitraClip for treatment of SMR in addition to medical therapy and they had divergent results. The COAPT trial demonstrated that a reduction in SMR with MitraClip resulted in reduced mortality and heart failure hospitalisations along with improved symptoms and quality of life in appropriately selected patients. The MITRA-FR trial did not show any benefit from using MitraClip for patients with SMR. This article summarises the differences in these two trials and suggests a contemporary approach to the management of SMR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document