Myocardial strain analysis in family screening for genetic dilated cardiomyopathy: Testing the boundaries of normality?

Abstract Purpose Left ventricular (LV) longitudinal, circumferential, and radial motion can be measured using feature tracking of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. The aim of our study was to detect differences in LV mechanics between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) who were matched using a propensity score-based model. Methods Between April 2017 and October 2019, 1224 patients were included in our CMR registry, among them 141 with ICM and 77 with DCM. Propensity score matching was used to pair patients based on their indexed end-diastolic volume (EDVi), ejection fraction (EF), and septal T1 relaxation time. Feature tracking provided six parameters for global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain with corresponding strain rates. Results Propensity score matching yielded 72 patients in each group (DCM mean age 58.6 ± 11.6 years, 15 females; ICM mean age 62.6 ± 13.2 years, 11 females, p = 0.084 and 0.44 respectively; LV-EF 32.2 ± 13.5% vs. 33.8 ± 12.1%, p = 0.356; EDVi 127.2 ± 30.7 ml/m² vs. 121.1 ± 41.8 ml/m², p = 0.251; native T1 values 1165 ± 58 ms vs. 1167 ± 70 ms, p = 0.862). There was no difference in global longitudinal strain between DCM and ICM patients (-10.9 ± 5.5% vs. -11.2 ± 4.7%, p = 0.72), whereas in DCM patients there was a significant reduction in global circumferential strain (-10.0 ± 4.5% vs. -12.2 ± 4.7%, p = 0.002) and radial strain (17.1 ± 8.51 vs. 21.2 ± 9.7%, p = 0.039). Conclusion Our data suggest that ICM and DCM patients have inherently different myocardial mechanics, even if phenotypes are similar. The ability to discriminate these two conditions may aid in developing additional prognostic and therapeutic strategies in the future.

Download Full-text

Prognostic value of myocardial strain analysis with cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽

10.1186/1532-429x-16-s1-o90 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 16 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. O90

Author(s):

Sebastian Buss ◽

Florian Andre ◽

Kristin Breuninger ◽

Stephanie Lehrke ◽

Andreas Voss ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Myocardial Strain ◽

Strain Analysis ◽

Myocardial Strain Analysis

Download Full-text

CMR-derived myocardial strain analysis differentiates ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy—a propensity score-matched study

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging ◽

10.1007/s10554-021-02469-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Julia Vietheer ◽

Lena Lehmann ◽

Claudia Unbehaun ◽

Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat ◽

Jan Sebastian Wolter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Feature Tracking ◽

Global Longitudinal Strain ◽

Myocardial Strain ◽

Radial Strain ◽

Strain Analysis ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Myocardial Strain Analysis

AbstractLeft ventricular (LV) longitudinal, circumferential, and radial motion can be measured using feature tracking of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. The aim of our study was to detect differences in LV mechanics between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) who were matched using a propensity score-based model. Between April 2017 and October 2019, 1224 patients were included in our CMR registry, among them 141 with ICM and 77 with DCM. Propensity score matching was used to pair patients based on their indexed end-diastolic volume (EDVi), ejection fraction (EF), and septal T1 relaxation time (psmatch2 module L Feature tracking provided six parameters for global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain with corresponding strain rates in each group. Strain parameters were compared between matched pairs of ICM and DCM patients using paired t tests. Propensity score matching yielded 72 patients in each group (DCM mean age 58.6 ± 11.6 years, 15 females; ICM mean age 62.6 ± 13.2 years, 11 females, p = 0.084 and 0.44 respectively; LV-EF 32.2 ± 13.5% vs. 33.8 ± 12.1%, p = 0.356; EDVi 127.2 ± 30.7 ml/m2 vs. 121.1 ± 41.8 ml/m2, p = 0.251; native T1 values 1165 ± 58 ms vs. 1167 ± 70 ms, p = 0.862). There was no difference in global longitudinal strain between DCM and ICM patients (− 10.9 ± 5.5% vs. − 11.2 ± 4.7%, p = 0.72), whereas in DCM patients there was a significant reduction in global circumferential strain (− 10.0 ± 4.5% vs. − 12.2 ± 4.7%, p = 0.002) and radial strain (17.1 ± 8.51 vs. 21.2 ± 9.7%, p = 0.039). Our data suggest that ICM and DCM patients have inherently different myocardial mechanics, even if phenotypes are similar. Our data show that GCS is significantly more impaired in DCM patients. This feature may help in more thoroughly characterizing cardiomyopathy patients.

Download Full-text

Echocardiographic Myocardial Strain Analysis Describes Subclinical Cardiac Dysfunction after Craniospinal Irradiation in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Central Nervous System Tumors

10.21203/rs.3.rs-121700/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Thomas D Ryan ◽

Hugo R. Martinez ◽

Ralph Salloum ◽

Erin Wright ◽

Lauren Bueche ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Central Nervous System ◽

Cardiac Dysfunction ◽

Myocardial Strain ◽

Strain Analysis ◽

Late Time ◽

Systolic Strain ◽

Peak Systolic Strain ◽

Myocardial Strain Analysis ◽

Late Time Point ◽

Time Point

Abstract Background: Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is part of the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and is associated with cardiovascular disease in adults. Global myocardial strain analysis including longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLS), circumferential peak systolic strain (GCS) and radial peak systolic strain (GRS) can reveal subclinical cardiac dysfunction.Methods: Retrospective, single-center study in patients managed with CSI vs. age-matched controls. Clinical data and echocardiography, including myocardial strain analysis, were collected at early (<12 months) and late ( 12 months) after completion of CSI.Results: Echocardiograms were available in 20 early and 34 late patients. Patients at the late time point were older (21.7±10.4 vs. 13.3 9.6 years), and further out from CSI (13.1±8.8 vs. 0.2±0.3 years). Standard echocardiographic parameters were normal for all subjects. For the early time, CSI vs. control: GLS was -16.8 3.6% vs. -21.3 4.0% (p=0.0002), GCS was -22.5 5.2% vs. -21.3 3.4% (p=0.28), and GRS was 21.8 11.0% vs. 26.9 7.7% (p=0.07). At the late time point, CSI vs. control: GLS was -16.2 5.4% vs. -21.6 3.7% (p<0.0001), GCS was -20.9 6.8% vs. -21.9 3.5% (p=0.42), and GRS was 22.5 10.0% vs. 27.3 8.3% (p=0.03). Radiation type (proton vs. photon), and radiation dose (<30 Gy vs. 30 Gy) did not impact any parameter.Conclusions: Subclinical cardiac systolic dysfunction by GLS is present both early and late after CSI. These results argue for inclusion of baseline cardiovascular assessment and early initiation of longitudinal follow-up post CSI.

Download Full-text