scholarly journals Effects of the 2017 clinical practice guidelines on hypertension in children and adolescents: A commentary

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 100014
Author(s):  
Bonita Falkner
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e038646
Author(s):  
Maíra Ramos Alves ◽  
Cristiane de Cássia Bergamaschi ◽  
Flávia Blaseck Sorrilha ◽  
Izabela Fulone ◽  
Silvio Barberato-Filho ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have increased substantially mainly in the paediatric area of mental health. However, little is known about the quality or how recommendations for the treatment of disorders such as schizophrenia in children and adolescents have changed over time. The aim of this study will be to assess the quality of the development of CPGs for the treatment and management of schizophrenia in children and adolescents over time using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool and to compare the recommendations and interventions described in these documents.Methods and analysisCPGs will be identified using a prospective protocol through a systematic search of multiple databases (Medline, Embase, Health Systems Evidence, Epistemonikos, Lilacs, etc) and guideline websites from 2004 to December 2020. The quality of the guidelines will be assessed by three reviewers, independently using the AGREE II. CPGs will be considered of high-quality if they scored ≥60% in four or more domains of the AGREE II instrument. Non-parametric tests will be used to test for the change of quality over time. We will summarise the different evidence grading systems and compare the recommendations.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required since it is a literature-based study. Future results of the research can be submitted for publication in scientific journals of high impact, peer reviewed and also published in national and international conferences. The results derived from this study will contribute to the improvement of health institutions and policies, informing about existing recommendation guidelines and about deficiencies and qualities found in those. This study may also identify key areas for future research. This study may guide the search and choice for high quality CPGs by health policy makers and health professionals and subsidise future adaptations.Protocol registration numberCRD42020164899.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 3129-3141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Seiffert ◽  
Carlos Zaror ◽  
Claudia Atala-Acevedo ◽  
Andrea Ormeño ◽  
María José Martínez-Zapata ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  

This new compendium is your source for trustworthy recommendations on quality care of children and adolescents with mental health issues. https://shop.aap.org/mental-health-a-compendium-of-aap-clinical-practice-guidelines-and-policies-paperback/


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_A) ◽  
pp. 5A-16A ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret L Lawson ◽  
Danièle Pacaud ◽  
Sarah E Lawrence ◽  
Denis Daneman ◽  
Heather J Dean

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 494-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie Cardona ◽  
Andrea G Asnes

Clinical practice guidelines for informing children they have been subjected to caregiver-fabricated illness are highly limited in the current literature. This article addresses this issue by offering an ethically informed, psychological approach to the disclosure of this form of abuse to school-aged children and adolescents who have been significantly harmed. A multidisciplinary, staged model of communication which illustrates that truthful communication with children and their families is a necessary component of the recovery process is proposed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110251
Author(s):  
Ankita Saikia ◽  
M.S. Muthu ◽  
Omolola O. Orenuga ◽  
Peter Mossey ◽  
Lahcen Ousehal ◽  
...  

Objective: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) exist to present recommendations and policies aimed at optimizing the oral health of children and adolescents born with cleft lip and/or palate. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the scope, quality, adequacy, and consistency of CPGs related to oral health in children and adolescents with clefts, along with reporting any differences and shortcomings. Methods: A systematic review of the literature of CPGs following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines was conducted. Assessment of selected CPGs was performed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II methodological quality instrument. Results: Only 7 CPGs fulfilled the criteria. Of these, 4 were from the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, and 1 each from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. The lowest overall mean scores were in the domain “Rigor of Development” (mean 29.58%, SD 17.11), revealing lower quality in methodology of the guideline. The domain “Clarity of Presentation” (mean 73.80%, SD 7.87) revealed the best score. Conclusions: Our review results reveal a lack of integrated high-quality CPGs that can be used as universal guidelines by health workers in a range of disciplines for improving oral health in children and adolescents with cleft problems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document