Life cycle assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plant with post-combustion carbon capture, transport and storage

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhawna Singh ◽  
Anders H. Strømman ◽  
Edgar Hertwich
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle Assessment ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Combined Cycle Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
And Storage

scholarly journals Exergetic Analysis of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Plant with a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell for Carbon Capture

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 533
Author(s):  
Alberto Fichera ◽  
Samiran Samanta ◽  
Rosaria Volpe
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Gas Turbine ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell ◽  
Molten Carbonate ◽  
Combined Cycle Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
Exergetic Analysis

This study aims to propose the repowering of an existing Italian natural-gas fired combined cycle power plant through the integration of Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFC) downstream of the gas turbine for CO2 capture and to pursuit an exergetic analysis of the two schemes. The flue gases of the turbine are used to feed the cathode of the MCFC, where CO2 is captured and transported to the anode while generating electric power. The retrofitted plant produces 787.454 MW, in particular, 435.29 MW from the gas turbine, 248.9 MW from the steam cycle, and 135.283 MW from the MCFC. Around 42.4% of the exergy destruction has been obtained, the majority belonging to the combustion chamber and, in minor percentages, to the gas turbine and the MCFC. The overall net plant efficiency and net exergy efficiency are estimated to be around 55.34 and 53.34%, respectively. Finally, the specific CO2 emission is around 66.67 kg/MWh, with around 2 million tons of carbon dioxide sequestrated.

scholarly journals Solvent Screening and Feasible Study of Retrofitting CO2 Capture System for Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 2394-2401
Author(s):  
Satoshi Saito ◽  
Norihide Egami ◽  
Toshihisa Kiyokuni ◽  
Mitsuru Udatsu ◽  
Hideo Kitamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Combined Cycle Power Plant ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
Feasible Study

Assessment of Future Sustainable Power Technologies with Carbon Capture and Storage

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Hadjipaschalis ◽  
Costas Christou ◽  
Andreas Poullikkas
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Unit Cost ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Major Power ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Avoidance Cost

In this work, a technical, economic and environmental analysis concerning the use of three major power generation plant types including pulverized coal, integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) and natural gas combined cycle, with or without carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (CCS) integration, is carried out. For the analysis, the IPP optimization software is used in which the electricity unit cost and the CO2 avoidance cost from the various candidate power generation technologies is calculated. The analysis indicates that the electricity unit cost of IGCC technology with CCS integration is the least cost option with the lowest CO2 avoidance cost of all candidate technologies with CCS integration. Further investigation concerning the effect of the loan interest rate on the economic performance of the candidate plants revealed that up to a value of loan interest of approximately 5.7%, the IGCC plant with CCS retains the lowest electricity unit cost. Above this level, the natural gas combined cycle plant with post-combustion CCS becomes more economically attractive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document