scholarly journals Comparison of broad-range polymerase chain reaction and metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-xin Wang ◽  
Zida Huang ◽  
Xinyu Fang ◽  
Wenbo Li ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
...  
HLA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Nilsson ◽  
T. Funck ◽  
N. D. Kjersgaard ◽  
T. V. F. Hviid

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 440-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zida Huang ◽  
Wenbo Li ◽  
Gwo-Chin Lee ◽  
Xinyu Fang ◽  
Li Xing ◽  
...  

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogens from synovial fluid of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) patients. Methods A group of 75 patients who underwent revision knee or hip arthroplasties were enrolled prospectively. Ten patients with primary arthroplasties were included as negative controls. Synovial fluid was collected for mNGS analysis. Optimal thresholds were determined to distinguish pathogens from background microbes. Synovial fluid, tissue, and sonicate fluid were obtained for culture. Results A total of 49 PJI and 21 noninfection patients were finally included. Of the 39 culture-positive PJI cases, mNGS results were positive in 37 patients (94.9%), and were consistent with culture results at the genus level in 32 patients (86.5%) and at the species level in 27 patients (73.0%). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing additionally identified 15 pathogens from five culture-positive and all ten culture-negative PJI cases, and even one pathogen from one noninfection patient, while yielding no positive findings in any primary arthroplasty. However, seven pathogens identified by culture were missed by mNGS. The sensitivity of mNGS for diagnosing PJI was 95.9%, which was significantly higher than that of comprehensive culture (79.6%; p = 0.014). The specificity is similar between mNGS and comprehensive culture (95.2% and 95.2%, respectively; p = 1.0). Conclusion Metagenomic next-generation sequencing can effectively identify pathogens from synovial fluid of PJI patients, and demonstrates high accuracy in diagnosing PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):440–449.


Author(s):  
Daniel Richter ◽  
Alexandra Heininger ◽  
Karsten Schmidt ◽  
Thomas Schmoch ◽  
Michael Bernhard ◽  
...  

ZusammenfassungIm Rahmen der Sepsis und des septischen Schocks spielen, trotz der zunehmenden Verbreitung von neuen molekularbiologischen Verfahren, der kulturelle Erregernachweis und die Resistenztestung weiterhin die entscheidende Rolle in der antimikrobiellen Therapie auf der Intensivstation. Hierbei kann der Erregernachweis für die antimikrobielle Therapie einerseits direkt aus dem Patientenblut, andererseits aber auch aus diversen anderen Probenmaterialien (respiratorische Sekrete, Punktat, intraoperative Abstriche etc.) geführt werden. Ein Nachteil konventioneller kultureller Verfahren im Kontext kritisch kranker Patienten ist die zeitliche Latenz bis zum Erregernachweis bzw. zum Ergebnis der Resistenztestung. Molekularbiologische Verfahren wie Techniken der Erregerdiagnostik und Resistenztestung, die auf Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) oder vor allem Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) basieren, versprechen hier zwar kürzere Umlaufzeiten, sind aber aktuell noch kein klinischer Standard. Trotzdem besitzen diese Verfahren das Potenzial, einen Paradigmenwechsel in der Erregerdiagnostik herbeizuführen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document