scholarly journals Interrupting providers with clinical decision support to improve care for heart failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 103956
Author(s):  
Saul Blecker ◽  
Jonathan S. Austrian ◽  
Leora I. Horwitz ◽  
Gilad Kuperman ◽  
Donna Shelley ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Asunción Albert ◽  
Antonio J. Serrano ◽  
Emilio Soria ◽  
Nicolás Victor Jiménez

In this chapter, authors develop a system for prevention and detection of congestive heart failure and fibrillation. Due to its narrow therapeutic range more than 10% of the patients treated with DGX can suffer toxic effects, but it is estimated that half of the cases of digitalis toxicity could be prevented. Two multivariate models were developed to prevent digitalis toxicity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro J. Caraballo ◽  
James M. Naessens ◽  
Mark J. Klarich ◽  
Dorinda J. Leutink ◽  
James A. Peterson ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e019087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Elizabeth Kessler ◽  
Rickey E Carter ◽  
David A Cook ◽  
Daryl Jon Kor ◽  
Paul M McKie ◽  
...  

IntroductionClinical practice guidelines facilitate optimal clinical practice. Point of care access, interpretation and application of such guidelines, however, is inconsistent. Informatics-based tools may help clinicians apply guidelines more consistently. We have developed a novel clinical decision support tool that presents guideline-relevant information and actionable items to clinicians at the point of care. We aim to test whether this tool improves the management of hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation and heart failure by primary care clinicians.Methods/analysisClinician care teams were cluster randomised to receive access to the clinical decision support tool or passive access to institutional guidelines on 16 May 2016. The trial began on 1 June 2016 when access to the tool was granted to the intervention clinicians. The trial will be run for 6 months to ensure a sufficient number of patient encounters to achieve 80% power to detect a twofold increase in the primary outcome at the 0.05 level of significance. The primary outcome measure will be the percentage of guideline-based recommendations acted on by clinicians for hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation and heart failure. We hypothesise care teams with access to the clinical decision support tool will act on recommendations at a higher rate than care teams in the standard of care arm.Ethics and disseminationThe Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures. Informed consent was obtained from clinicians. A waiver of informed consent and of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorisation for patients managed by clinicians in the study was granted. In addition to publication, results will be disseminated via meetings and newsletters.Trial registration numberNCT02742545.


2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J Leslie ◽  
Mark Hartswood ◽  
Catrin Meurig ◽  
Sinead P McKee ◽  
Roger Slack ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document