A comparative study of the change of condylar position after mandibular setback using bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy between conventional and surgery-first orthognathic surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. e266-e267
Author(s):  
K. Myung-In ◽  
B.G. Kim ◽  
J.W. Lee ◽  
S. Jung ◽  
H.J. Park ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
KENSUKE YAMAUCHI ◽  
TAKESHI KANEUJI ◽  
SHINNOSUKE NOGAMI ◽  
YOSHIHIRO YAMASHITA ◽  
TETSU TAKAHASHI ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Tyan ◽  
Hyun-Hye Kim ◽  
Ki-Ho Park ◽  
Su-Jung Kim ◽  
Kyung-A Kim ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate sequential images of the condylar position in relation to the glenoid fossa after orthognathic surgery in patients with facial asymmetry using cone beam computed tomography. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 adult patients (11 men and 9 women; mean age, 22.1 ± 4.02 years) with facial asymmetry who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation were involved. Cone beam computed tomography scans were obtained before treatment (T0), 1 month before the surgery (T1), and 1 day (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4), and 12 months (T5) after the surgery. The condyle position was evaluated. Results: At 1 day after surgery (T2), the condylar position on both sides significantly changed posteriorly, inferiorly, and laterally, but no significant difference was observed between the nonaffected and affected sides. The condyle on the nonaffected side had a tendency to recover its preoperative position at 3 months after surgery (T3) and inclined slightly laterally up to 1 year after the surgery (T5). The condyle on the affected side returned more closely to the glenoid fossa than to its pretreatment position at 3 months after surgery (T3). Thereafter, it showed a more backward and downward position (T5). Conclusions: The overall condylar position after an orthognathic surgery in patients with facial asymmetry was relatively stable at 1 year after surgery. However, the condyle on the affected side during the first 3 months after surgery should be carefully monitored for surgical stability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Migliorati ◽  
Sara Drago ◽  
Irene Schiavetti ◽  
Guglielmo Ramieri ◽  
Giovanni Gerbino ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752095008
Author(s):  
Gaurav Singh ◽  
Utsav Singh Gurung ◽  
Madan Mishra ◽  
Amit Gaur

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and share our experience with the surgery first approach (SFA) for correction of skeletal malocclusion. Methods: After consultation with the department of orthodontics, 45 patients with skeletal malocclusions suitable to undergo SFA were enrolled in this study (14 bimaxillary protrusion and 31 skeletal class III malocclusion). Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, subapical osteotomy, and genioplasty were performed as required. After a healing period of 2 weeks, postoperative orthodontic treatment was started to achieve the final occlusion. Results: The mean duration of postoperative orthodontic treatment was 15.2 months, which is much shorter than the conventional orthodontic first approach (OFA) where presurgical orthodontic duration alone takes 12-24 months according to an individual. In the bimaxillary protrusion group, it was 18 months, which was significantly longer than for the other group ( P < .05). Conclusions: SFA offers an efficient alternative to conventional OFA with shorter total treatment duration, immediate marked improvement in facial profile, reduced biological costs, and similar operative stability. However, it comes at the cost of heightened challenges regarding case selection, accurate prediction, and surgical precision. With a joint venture between skilled and experienced surgeons and orthodontists, the outcome can be very promising.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document