scholarly journals Evaluation of a new biphasic calcium phosphate for maxillary sinus floor elevation: microcomputed tomography and histomorphometrical analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
M.N. Helder ◽  
F.A.S. van Esterik ◽  
H.J. Prins ◽  
M.D. Kwehandjaja ◽  
M.A. van Duin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Biphasic Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Microcomputed Tomography ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

scholarly journals Evaluation of a new biphasic calcium phosphate for maxillary sinus floor elevation: Micro-CT and histomorphometrical analyses

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 488-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco N. Helder ◽  
Fransisca A. S. van Esterik ◽  
Mardi D. Kwehandjaja ◽  
Christiaan M. ten Bruggenkate ◽  
Jenneke Klein-Nulend ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Biphasic Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

scholarly journals The Use of Autogenous Bone Mixed with a Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in a Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Procedure with a 6-Month Healing Time: A Clinical, Radiological, Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation

Coatings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 462
Author(s):  
Wilhelmus F. Bouwman ◽  
Nathalie Bravenboer ◽  
Christiaan M. ten Bruggenkate ◽  
Engelbert A. J. M. Schulten
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Biphasic Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Bone Biopsies ◽  
Osteoid Surface ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Background: In this study it is evaluated whether autogenous bone mixed with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) used in a maxillary sinus floor elevation (MSFE) leads to improved bone formation. Materials and methods: In five patients a unilateral MSFE was performed. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed on bone biopsies that were obtained 6 months after MSFE during dental implant surgery. Results: The average vital bone volume was 29.9% of the total biopsy (BV/TV, SD ± 10.1) of which 7.1% was osteoid (OV/BV, SD ± 4.8). The osteoid surface (OS/BS) covered 26.0% (SD ± 13.4) of the bone surface. The BS/TV covered 4.7 mm2/mm3 (SD ± 2.3). Compared with previous studies the analyses showed a difference for trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.) and osteoid surface (OS/BS), but not for BV/TV, OV/BV and the number of osteoclasts. Conclusion: MSFE with autogenous bone mixed with BCP shows an amount of newly formed bone that is comparable with the findings from the previously published 6-month study with pure BCP. However, a better distribution of the new bone over the entire biopsy was observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document