The role of postoperative external-beam radiotherapy in the management of patients with papillary thyroid cancer invading the trachea

2006 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Chang Keum ◽  
Yang Gun Suh ◽  
Woong Sub Koom ◽  
Jae Ho Cho ◽  
Su Jung Shim ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Joo Hee Kim ◽  
Kwang Min Kim ◽  
Joon Beom Park ◽  
Keum Seok Bae ◽  
Seong Joon Kang

Head & Neck ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1719-1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uchechukwu C. Megwalu ◽  
Lisa A. Orloff ◽  
Yifei Ma

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16035-e16035
Author(s):  
William A. Wilson ◽  
Joseph Valentino ◽  
Thomas Gal ◽  
David Sloan ◽  
Kenneth B. Ain ◽  
...  

e16035 Background: Locoregionally recurrent radioactive iodine (RAI) refractory papillary thyroid cancer represents a small percentage of papillary thyroid cancers but is an aggressive disease with significantly lower survival rates. This retrospective review is our experience with these cancers treated with maximal surgical resection followed by external beam radiotherapy. Methods: 26 patients treated from 2001-2011 were eligible for review. After obtaining IRB approval, medical records were reviewed for clinical outcome. All patients had histologically proven recurrences that were negative on I-131 scans. All patients were maximally resected. All patients received external radiotherapy to the thyroid bed, bilateral cervical lymph node levels II-IV, level VI, and superior mediastinal nodes. 15/26 patients received intensity modulated, 9/26 patients received 3-D conformal, and 2/26 patients received Tomotherapy radiation treatment. The mean dose was 5790 cGy (range 5280-6800 cGy). Results: All histologies were papillary thyroid cancer with 4/26 exhibiting tall cell features and 1/26 diffuse sclerosing features. All patients had locoregional relapse in the cervical nodes (16/26) or in the mediastinum (5/26) or both areas (5/26). The mean pre-treatment thyroglobulin was 5.2 (range <0.1 to 599.1). The mean post-treatment thyroglobulin was 1.0 (range <0.1-5.2). Median follow-up was 55 months (range 7-123 months). 0/26 patients failed locoregionally. 2/26 patients failed distantly (lungs). 20/26 patients (77%) of patients had undetectable thyroglobulin at last follow-up. 4/26 patients had detectable thyroglobulin (2.5-16.9), but had not recurred on imaging. 2/26 required PEG placement during treatment, but 0/26 patients were PEG-dependent on long-term follow-up. 1/26 patients experienced grade III osteoradionecrosis of the mandible. Conclusions: External beam radiotherapy provides excellent locoregional control for locoregionally recurrent radioactive iodine-refractory papillary thyroid cancers. Long-term grade III and IV toxicities are uncommon.


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 971-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Lee ◽  
Michael Tuttle

The role of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in treating thyroid cancer has brought forth controversy. Due to various histologic presentations and different natural histories, there is no uniform approach/recommendation among centers and/or authorities regarding the role of EBRT for thyroid cancer. This is particularly true for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) where the clinical course can range from a disease that is cured with simple surgery to an aggressive form of poorly differentiated thyroid cancer with high rates of recurrence/death from disease. In addition, because the majority of the patients with PTC undergo postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment, the question remains as to what is the exact role of EBRT for PTC in the setting of RAI treatment? In this issue of Endocrine-Related Cancer, Chow and colleagues identified indications for EBRT and RAI therapy for PTC based on a retrospective review of 1300 patients. The authors concluded that postoperative RAI treatment is indicated in patients with pT2-pT4, pN0-pN1b while postoperative EBRT is recommended for patients with gross residual, positive margin, pT4, pN1b, and lymph nodes > 2 cm disease. Other centers have also published their experience on the value of EBRT for PTC but with different indications. The reasons for the variations from different centers are complex. However, when all published results are taken together, the findings confirm the added value of EBRT to the present management of PTC in a select group of patients, particularly those with high risk features. In this commentary, these issues will be discussed and recommendations regarding the role of EBRT will be given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document