Survival Outcomes and the Role of Adjuvant Therapy Sequencing in Type II Uterine Cancer After Definitive Surgery

Author(s):  
T.R. Heumann ◽  
R. Diaz ◽  
Y. Liu ◽  
K. Hanley ◽  
I.R. Horowitz ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 589
Author(s):  
Michel Prefontaine ◽  
Vikram Velker ◽  
David D'Souza ◽  
Eric Leung

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Melody Qu ◽  
Vikram M. Velker ◽  
Eric Leung ◽  
Janice S. Kwon ◽  
Mohamed A. Elshaikh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 202
Author(s):  
A. Buskwofie ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
J.Y. Hou ◽  
C.M. St. Clair ◽  
A.I. Tergas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Velker ◽  
David D’Souza ◽  
Michel Prefontaine ◽  
Jacob McGee ◽  
Eric Leung

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S292
Author(s):  
M.X. Qu ◽  
V. Velker ◽  
E. Leung ◽  
J. Kwon ◽  
M.A. Elshaikh ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (25) ◽  
pp. 6220-6232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Lim ◽  
Michael Michael ◽  
G. Bruce Mann ◽  
Trevor Leong

Gastric cancer has a poor prognosis. The majority of patients will relapse after definitive surgery, and 5-year survival after surgery remains poor. The role of adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer has been controversial given the lack of significant survival benefit in many randomized studies so far. The results of a large North American study (Gastrointestinal Cancer Intergroup Trial INT 0116) reported that postoperative chemoradiotherapy conferred a survival advantage compared with surgery alone, which has led to the regimen being adopted as a new standard of care. However, controversies still remain regarding surgical technique, the place of more effective and less toxic chemotherapy regimens, and the use of more modern radiation planning techniques to improve treatment delivery and outcome in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. This article reviews the current status of the adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer including discussion on the research directions aimed at optimizing treatment efficacy. Issues such as the identification of patients who are more likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy are also addressed. Further clinical trials are needed to move towards better consensus and standardization of care.


Diabetes ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Baron ◽  
L. Schaeffer ◽  
P. Shragg ◽  
O. G. Kolterman

Diabetes ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1341-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Felber ◽  
E. Ferrannini ◽  
A. Golay ◽  
H. U. Meyer ◽  
D. Theibaud ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 451
Author(s):  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Paola Deias ◽  
Francesca Patriarca

The recent introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), with several cellular targets, such as CD-38 (daratumumab and isatuximab) and SLAM F7 (elotuzumab), differently combined with other classes of agents, has significantly extended the outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in different phases of the disease. Initially used in advanced/refractory patients, different MoAbs combination have been introduced in the treatment of newly diagnosed transplant eligible patients (NDTEMM), showing a significant improvement in the depth of the response and in survival outcomes, without a significant price in terms of toxicity. In smoldering MM, MoAbs have been applied, either alone or in combination with other drugs, with the goal of delaying the progression to active MM and restoring the immune system. In this review, we will focus on the main results achieved so far and on the main on-going trials using MoAbs in SMM and NDTEMM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document