Radiotherapy Remains Underutilized in the Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Disparities in Practice Patterns in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. E59-E60
Author(s):  
Jacob Shabason ◽  
Vishruth Reddy ◽  
Varsha Jain ◽  
Sriram Venigalla ◽  
William Levin ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 364 ◽  
Author(s):  
_ _

Soft tissue sarcomas are the most frequent sarcomas; the annual incidence for 2007 in the United States is estimated at about 9220 cases, with an overall mortality rate of approximately 3560 cases per year. Important updates for the 2007 version of the guidelines include the addition of epirubicin (single agent) and the combination of epirubicin, ifosfamide, and mesna as generally accepted systemic therapy. Imatinib was added as an option for desmoid tumors. For the most recent version of the guidelines, please visit NCCN.org


Cancer ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 486-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Ross ◽  
Richard K. Severson ◽  
Scott Davis ◽  
John J. Brooks

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan C. Parikh ◽  
Maria Lorenzo ◽  
Lisa M. Hess ◽  
Sean D. Candrilli ◽  
Steven Nicol ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-306
Author(s):  
Vishruth K. Reddy ◽  
Varsha Jain ◽  
Sriram Venigalla ◽  
William P. Levin ◽  
Robert J. Wilson ◽  
...  

Background: Practice patterns of radiation therapy (RT) use for soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) remain quite variable, despite clinical practice guidelines recommending the addition of RT to surgery for patients with high-grade STS, particularly for larger tumors. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we assessed patterns of overall RT use, neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment, and specific RT modalities in this population. Patients and Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with stage II/III STS in 2004 through 2015 were identified from the NCDB. Patterns of care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 27,426 total patients, 11,654 (42%) were treated with surgery alone versus 15,772 (58%) with RT in addition to surgery, with no overall increase in RT use over the study period. Notable clinical predictors of receipt of RT included tumor size (>5 cm), grade III, and tumors arising in the extremities. Conversely, female sex, older age (≥70 years), Black race, noncommercial insurance coverage, farther distance to treatment, and poor performance status were negative predictors of RT use. Of those receiving RT, 27% were treated with neoadjuvant RT and 73% with adjuvant RT. The proportion of those receiving neoadjuvant RT increased over time. Relevant factors associated with neoadjuvant RT included treatment at academic centers, larger tumor size, and extremity tumors. Of those who received RT with a modality specified as either intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) or 3D conformal RT (3DCRT), 61% were treated with IMRT and 39% with 3DCRT. The proportion of patients treated with IMRT increased over time. Relevant factors associated with IMRT use included treatment at academic centers, commercial insurance coverage, and larger and nonextremity tumors. Conclusions: Although use of neoadjuvant RT and IMRT has increased over time, a significant number of patients with STS are not receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant RT. Our findings also note potential sociodemographic disparities and highlight the concern that not all patients with STS are being equally considered for RT.


2016 ◽  
Vol 295 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lannah L. Lua ◽  
Yvette Hollette ◽  
Prathamesh Parm ◽  
Gayle Allenback ◽  
Vani Dandolu

Author(s):  
David D. B. Bates ◽  
Hiram Shaish ◽  
Marc J. Gollub ◽  
Mukesh Harisinghani ◽  
Chandana Lall ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document