Stereotactic Radiation Treatment (SBRT) For Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Using Dynamic Tumor Tracking (DTT)

2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. e655-e656
Author(s):  
T. Zhang ◽  
E.M. Dunne ◽  
A. Bergman ◽  
T. Mestrovic ◽  
C. Rodgerson ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. S87
Author(s):  
Zhang Tina (Wanting) ◽  
Emma Maria Dunne ◽  
Alanah Bergman ◽  
Tony Mestrovic ◽  
Christine Rodgerson ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 846-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Mattozo ◽  
Antonio A. F. De Salles ◽  
Ivan A. Klement ◽  
Alessandra Gorgulho ◽  
David McArthur ◽  
...  

Object The authors analyzed the results of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for the treatment of recurrent meningiomas that were described at initial resection as showing aggressive, atypical, or malignant features (nonbenign). Methods Twenty-five patients who underwent SRS and/or SRT for nonbenign meningiomas between December 1992 and August 2004 were included. Thirteen of these patients underwent treatment for multiple primary or recurrent lesions. In all, 52 tumors were treated. All histological sections were reviewed and reclassified according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2000 guidelines as benign (Grade I), atypical (Grade II), or anaplastic (Grade III) meningiomas. The median follow-up period was 42 months. Seventeen (68%) of the cases were reclassified as follows: WHO Grade I (five cases), Grade II (11 cases), and Grade III (one case). Malignant progression occurred in eight cases (32%) during the follow-up period; these cases were considered as a separate group. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the Grades I, II, and III, and malignant progression groups were 100, 83, 0, and 11%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the Grade II group, the 3-year PFS rates for patients treated with SRS and SRT were 100 and 33%, respectively (p = 0.1). After initial treatment, 22 new tumors required treatment using SRS or SRT; 17 (77%) of them occurred inside the original resection cavity. Symptomatic edema developed in one patient (4%). Conclusions Stereotactic radiation treatment provided effective local control of “aggressive” Grade I and Grade II meningiomas, whereas Grade III lesions were associated with poor outcome. The outcome of cases in the malignant progression group was intermediate between that of the Grade II and Grade III groups, with the lesions showing a tendency toward malignancy.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Znati ◽  
Rebecca Carter ◽  
Marcos Vasquez ◽  
Adam Westhorpe ◽  
Hassan Shahbakhti ◽  
...  

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in incidence worldwide and requires new approaches to therapy. The combination of anti-angiogenic drug therapy and radiotherapy is one promising new approach. The anti-angiogenic drug vandetanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and RET proto-oncogene with radio-enhancement potential. To explore the benefit of combined vandetanib and radiotherapy treatment for HCC, we studied outcomes following combined treatment in pre-clinical models. Methods: Vandetanib and radiation treatment were combined in HCC cell lines grown in vitro and in vivo. In addition to 2D migration and clonogenic assays, the combination was studied in 3D spheroids and a syngeneic mouse model of HCC. Results: Vandetanib IC 50 s were measured in 20 cell lines and the drug was found to significantly enhance radiation cell kill and to inhibit both cell migration and invasion in vitro. In vivo, combination therapy significantly reduced cancer growth and improved overall survival, an effect that persisted for the duration of vandetanib treatment. Conclusion: In 2D and 3D studies in vitro and in a syngeneic model in vivo, the combination of vandetanib plus radiotherapy was more efficacious than either treatment alone. This new combination therapy for HCC merits evaluation in clinical trials.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 301-301
Author(s):  
R. Kumar ◽  
J. Kang ◽  
J. M. Herman ◽  
R. Tuli ◽  
T. M. Pawlik ◽  
...  

301 Background: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for intensity-modulated radiation delivery with faster treatment times and fewer delivered monitor units (MU). The dose-limiting structure for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the duodenum. We evaluate VMAT dose distribution, delivery times, and the effect of duodenal sparing (DS) for pancreas SBRT. Methods: Plans of 15 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (14 head/1 tail) were selected. VMAT treatment planning with the “SmartArc” function of Pinnacle v. 8.9 was used to plan one fraction of 25 Gy to the PTV (gross tumor + 2 mm expansion) normalized to the 80% isodose line. Two VMAT SBRT plans were conducted for each case; the first did not attempt to spare the duodenum (non DS) while the second did (DS). Constraints were stomach/duodenum any point max <30 Gy (for DS plan), liver D50 < 5 Gy, ipsilateral kidney D25 < 5 Gy, cord Dmax < 5 Gy and stomach D4 < 22.5 Gy. Results: Gross tumor volume ranged from 58.4cm3 to 320.3 cm3. The average overlap volume between PTV and the duodenum was 8.4 cm3. In 10/15 non-DS plans, the duodenal Dmax exceeded 30 Gy. With DS optimization, only 1/15 plans exceeded the 30 Gy threshold. These differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). Typical MU and delivery times, as calculated by the planning software, were 5494 MU and 775 secs vs. 5296 MU and 703 secs for the DS and non-DS plans, respectively. The difference in delivery times was significant (p=0.01), but amounted to only 1.2 min on average. The average duodenal Dmax for non-DS plans was 30.4Gy, D4% was 23.4 Gy. With DS, the average Dmax was reduced to 28.1Gy and D4% to <19.7 Gy (p<0.001). As expected, VMAT plans with greater overlap between the duodenum and PTV had a higher duodenal Dmax. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of VMAT for high-dose SBRT treatment of pancreatic cancer incorporating constraints to limit the dose to the duodenum. Future studies will evaluate whether VMAT with fractionated SBRT results in improved duodenal sparing more efficiently than traditional IMRT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 368-368
Author(s):  
Alan W. Katz ◽  
Douglas P Rosenzweig

368 Background: Stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy (SHORT) is a safe, non-invasive, treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with HCC receiving SHORT as a bridge therapy to LT. Methods: We reviewed 9 consecutive patients who underwent LT between 2008 and 2010 after receiving SHORT as bridge therapy. Radiation therapy was delivered using a 6 MV linear accelerator and an infrared based patient posititiong system. Total dose was 50 Gy in 10 fractions. Doses were prescribed to the 100% isodose line (IDL), with the 80% IDL covering the gross tumor plus a minimum margin of 7 mm. Survival was measured from the date of LT. Results: Median time from completion of SHORT to LT was 5.9 months (range; 0.9-15.7 months). After a median follow up of 48.6 months (range; 17.8-65.3 months) all patients were still alive. No significant surgical complications were seen in any of the patients. 8 patients demonstrated necrosis in the treated tumors, ranging from 8-100%. Only 1 patient did not show any treatment effect on pathological examination. One patient developed recurrent disease in a lymph node and in the transplanted liver, both treated by SHORT with complete response. Conclusions: SHORT is a safe and effective bridging therapy with patients experiencing excellent disease-free and overall survival following LT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document