stereotactic radiation therapy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

540
(FIVE YEARS 88)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 588
Author(s):  
Sasha Beyer ◽  
Nikhil T. Sebastian ◽  
Rahul Neal Prasad ◽  
Jacqueline Chu ◽  
Kevin Liu ◽  
...  

Background: Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (OFMT) is a rare musculoskeletal soft-tissue neoplasm of uncertain histogenesis most frequently occurring in the lower extremities. Conventionally, considered benign, these tumors are often managed by surgical resection followed by surveillance. However, malignant OFMTs with an increased propensity for local recurrence and distant metastasis have been recently identified, and the role of adjuvant therapy in these more aggressive cases is unclear. Case Description: We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first reported case of a primary, malignant, and intracranial OFMT. A 29-year-old female presented with recurrent headaches secondary to a large mass in her right frontal lobe. She underwent gross total resection of the brain mass with final pathology consistent with malignant OFMT demonstrating high-risk features including increased cellularity, grade, and mitotic activity. Due to these high-risk features, she received postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) to the resection cavity, and to the best of our knowledge, she represents the only known patient with OFMT to be treated with adjuvant FSRT. She tolerated the adjuvant treatment well with no acute or late toxicities and remains disease-free over 5 ½ years after resection. Conclusion: Adjuvant FSRT appears to be a safe and efficacious approach for managing this rare intracranial disease presentation. We review this patient’s clinical course in the context of the literature to demonstrate the difficulties associated with accurate diagnosis of this rare tumor and the controversial role of adjuvant therapy in preventing disease recurrence in this patient population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi42-vi42
Author(s):  
Drishti Panse ◽  
Aubrey Rogers ◽  
Edward Farhangi ◽  
Maria Péris-Celda ◽  
Khaled Adil

Abstract BACKGROUND The incidence of brain metastasis is approximately 200,000 worldwide annually. Stereotactic radiation therapy of post-operative cavity reduces local recurrence. Surgical cavity size changes significantly with 96.5% demonstrating volumetric change during post-operative period. We sought to define the optimal time interval that preserved the volumetric dimensions between the post-surgical MRI and the CT simulation used for stereotactic radiosurgery planning. METHODS Seven patients with brain metastasis that underwent surgical resection and stereotactic radiation treatment at Albany Medical Center from February 2019 to April 2020 were included in the study. A total of 8 target lesions were included. Brain lab planning system was used for contouring the target volume. A postoperative MRI within 24-48 hours after surgery was obtained. 3 patients required an additional interim MRI 16-50 days after surgery. The planning CT simulation was performed 2 days prior and up to 15 days after the post-operative/interim MRI and target volumes were compared. RESULTS The average volume of the post-surgical cavity contoured by the neurosurgeons on the post-operative/interim MRI was 15.96 cc (± 7.79 cc, range of 6.54 -24.9 cc). The average volume of the post-surgical cavity contoured by the radiation oncologists on the planning CT was 15.71 (± 7.49 cc, range of 6.53 -24.31 cc). There was no noticeable change in volume size between post-operative/interim MRI and planning CT up to the period of 15 days. LIMITATION This was a retrospective pilot study with a small sample size and patients recruited from a single center. CONCLUSION There is no change in size of the cavity volume for up to 15 days between post-operative/interim MRI and planning CT. This knowledge will help understand the optimal time interval between post-operative MRI and CT simulation for the stereotactic radiation therapy planning.


2021 ◽  
pp. 100816
Author(s):  
Rahul N. Prasad ◽  
Vedat O. Yildiz ◽  
Tejash Patel ◽  
Trevor J. Royce ◽  
Joshua D. Palmer

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S636-S637
Author(s):  
A. Gawish ◽  
A. Mpotsaris ◽  
I. Sandalcioglu ◽  
K.P. Stein ◽  
T. Brunner ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S492-S493
Author(s):  
J. Porte ◽  
C. Saint-Martin ◽  
T. Frederic-Moreau ◽  
M. Massiani ◽  
E. Jadaud ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document