scholarly journals Proximal femoral geometry and hip fracture patterns

Injury Extra ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
A.J. Bowey ◽  
A. Pillai ◽  
J. Gregory ◽  
R. Duthie
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Fracture Patterns ◽  
Femoral Geometry ◽  
Proximal Femoral Geometry

Measurement Accuracy of Proximal Femoral Geometry Using Biplanar Radiography

1981 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Burr ◽  
Larry T. Cook ◽  
Norman L. Martin ◽  
Marc Asher
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Accuracy ◽  
Femoral Geometry ◽  
Proximal Femoral Geometry

Sensitivity of Modeling Parameters in Proximal Femur Analyses

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Wang ◽  
Yanyao Jiang ◽  
Lixia Fan ◽  
Brian Greer
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Material Properties ◽  
Applied Load ◽  
Loading Rate ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Fracture Load ◽  
Loading Direction ◽  
Structural Capacity ◽  
Femoral Geometry

Abstract Hip fracture risk can be quantified using a factor of risk (Hayes et al., 1996): (1) Φ = Applied load / Fracture load The structural capacity, the denominator, can be affected by many parameters including femoral geometry, material properties, load locations, loading direction, loading rate, and frictional resistance.

The Relationship Between Loading Conditions and Fracture Patterns of the Proximal Femur

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Yang ◽  
K.-L. Shen ◽  
C. K. Demetropoulos ◽  
A. I. King ◽  
P. Kolodziej ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Ultimate Load ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Muscular Contraction ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Loading Conditions ◽  
Trochanteric Fractures ◽  
Fracture Patterns ◽  
The Relationship

In an attempt to test the hypothesis of spontaneous hip fracture, seven pairs of femurs, with ages ranging from 59 to 90, were tested under two loading conditions designed to simulate muscular contraction. Simulated iliopsoas contraction produced femoral neck fractures at an average normalized ultimate load of 5.2 ± 0.8 times body weight. Simulated gluteus medius contraction produced sub-/inter-trochanteric fractures at an average normalized ultimate load of 4.1 ± 0.6 times body weight. The average ultimate load for all specimens was 3040 ± 720 N. Fracture patterns produced by both loading conditions were clinically relevant. The results from this study suggest that abnormal contraction produced by major rotator muscles could induce hip fracture.

scholarly journals Numerical modelling of hip fracture patterns in human femur

2019 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Marco ◽  
Eugenio Giner ◽  
José Ramón Caeiro-Rey ◽  
M Henar Miguélez ◽  
Ricardo Larraínzar-Garijo
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Numerical Modelling ◽  
Human Femur ◽  
Fracture Patterns

scholarly journals The role of altered proximal femoral geometry in impaired pelvis stability and hip control during CP gait: A simulation study

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lode Bosmans ◽  
Karen Jansen ◽  
Mariska Wesseling ◽  
Guy Molenaers ◽  
Lennart Scheys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Study ◽  
Femoral Geometry ◽  
Proximal Femoral Geometry

A Morphometric Study of Proximal Femoral Geometry in Maharashtrian Population and its Clinical Perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-341
Author(s):  
Dwivedi Anil K. ◽  
◽  
Airan Niyati ◽  
Bhatnagar Rajan ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Morphometric Study ◽  
Clinical Perspective ◽  
Femoral Geometry ◽  
Proximal Femoral Geometry

Agreement Between Proximal Femoral Geometry and Component Design in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implications for Implant Choice

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1842-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph K. Boese ◽  
Jens Dargel ◽  
Janine Jostmeier ◽  
Peer Eysel ◽  
Michael Frink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Component Design ◽  
Femoral Geometry ◽  
Proximal Femoral Geometry
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document