scholarly journals Recommendation of use of checklists in tibial intramedullary nail removal: Retrospective study of mechanical complications related to nail removal

Injury ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1341-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antti Stenroos ◽  
Tuomas Brinck ◽  
Lauri Handolin
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Amr A. Abdelgawad ◽  
Enes Kanlic

Nonunion of long bones fixed with nails may result in implant failure. Removal of a broken intramedullary nail may be a real challenge. Many methods have been described to allow for removal of the broken piece of the nail. In this paper, we are reviewing the different techniques to extract a broken nail, classifying them into different subsets, and describing a new technique that we used to remove a broken tibial nail with narrow canal. Eight different categories of implant removal methods were described, with different methods within each category. This classification is very comprehensive and was never described before. We described a new technique (hook captured in the medulla by flexible nail introduced from the locking hole) which is a valuable technique in cases of nail of a small diameter where other methods cannot be used because of the narrow canal of the nail. Our eight categories for broken nail removal methods simplify the concepts of nail removal and allow the surgeon to better plan for the removal procedure.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-An Zhang ◽  
Chun-Hao Zhou ◽  
Xiang-Qing Meng ◽  
Jia Fang ◽  
Cheng-He Qin

Abstract Background: The incidence of intramedullary infection is increasing with increased use of intramedullary fixation for long bone fractures. However, appropriate treatment for infection after intramedullary nailing is unclear. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our treatment protocol for infection after intramedullary nailing: intramedullary nail removal, local debridement, reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation with or without segmental bone resection and distraction osteogenesis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with an infection after intramedullary nailing treated from 2014 to 2017 at our center. Patients with follow-up of less than 24 months, received other treatment methods, or those with serious medical conditions were excluded from the analysis. Patients met the criteria were treated as described above, followed by distraction osteogenesis in 9 cases to repair bone defect. The infection remission rate, infection recurrence rate, and post-operative complication rates were assessed. Results: A total of 19 patients were included in the analysis. All of patients had satisfactory outcomes with an average follow-up of 38.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 24 to 55months). Eighteen patients (94.7%) achieved infection remission; 1 patient (5.3%) developed a reinfection that resolved after repeat debridement. Nine patients with bone defects (average size 4.7 ± 1.3 cm; range, 3.3 to 7.6 cm) were treated with bone transport which successfully restored the length of involved limb. The mean bone transport duration was 10.7 ± 4.0 months (range, 6.7 to 19.5 months). The majority of patients achieved full weight bearing and became pain free during the follow-up period. Postoperative complications mainly included prolonged aseptic drainage (7/19; 36.8%), re-fracture (1/19; 5.3%) and joint stiffness, which were successfully managed by regular dressing changes and re-fixation, respectively. Conclusion: Intramedullary nail removal, canal reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation (with or without distraction osteogenesis) is effective for treating infections after intramedullary nailing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-An Zhang ◽  
Chun-Hao Zhou ◽  
Xiang-Qing Meng ◽  
Jia Fang ◽  
Cheng-He Qin

Abstract Background The incidence of intramedullary infection is increasing with increased use of intramedullary fixation for long bone fractures. However, appropriate treatment for infection after intramedullary nailing is unclear. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our treatment protocol for infection after intramedullary nailing: intramedullary nail removal, local debridement, reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation with or without segmental bone resection and distraction osteogenesis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with an infection after intramedullary nailing treated from 2014 to 2017 at our center. Patients with follow-up of less than 24 months, received other treatment methods, or those with serious medical conditions were excluded from the analysis. Patients met the criteria were treated as described above, followed by distraction osteogenesis in 9 cases to repair bone defect. The infection remission rate, infection recurrence rate, and post-operative complication rates were assessed. Results A total of 19 patients were included in the analysis. All of patients had satisfactory outcomes with an average follow-up of 38.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 24 to 55 months). Eighteen patients (94.7%) achieved infection remission; 1 patient (5.3%) developed a reinfection that resolved after repeat debridement. Nine patients with bone defects (average size 4.7 ± 1.3 cm; range, 3.3 to 7.6 cm) were treated with bone transport which successfully restored the length of involved limb. The mean bone transport duration was 10.7 ± 4.0 months (range, 6.7 to 19.5 months). The majority of patients achieved full weight bearing and became pain free during the follow-up period. Postoperative complications mainly included prolonged aseptic drainage (7/19; 36.8%), re-fracture (1/19; 5.3%) and joint stiffness, which were successfully managed by regular dressing changes and re-fixation, respectively. Conclusion Intramedullary nail removal, canal reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation (with or without distraction osteogenesis) is effective for treating infections after intramedullary nailing.


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-201
Author(s):  
Al. Șerban ◽  
V. Botnaru ◽  
R., Turcu ◽  
B. Obadă ◽  
St. Anderlik

Abstract Background: The gold standard treatment for complex fractures of tibial shaft is the reamed interlocking intramedullary nail. There has been some controversies about dynamization of statically locked nail, and some authors recommend routine dynamization for promotion of healing. This study evaluates the treatment of complex fractures of tibia shaft with static and dynamic interlocking intramedullary nail method. Methods: In this retrospective study, we studied 100 patients treated in Clinical Emergency Hospital Constanta between April 2012 - July 2013 diagnosed with tibia and fibula shaft fractures. They were treated by external fixation, and intramedullary nail. The intramedullary nail was blocked distally static or dynamic. Results: All patients achieved union during 12-18 weeks. The need of dynamization was required at 23 patients after 10 weeks from osteosynthesis. No significant complication was observed in our patients. Alignment of tibial fracture was perfect in all patients without any shortening and rotation. Conclusion: Locked intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for fractures of the tibial shaft.


2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen De Vil ◽  
Karl Fredrik Almqvist ◽  
Philippe Vanheeren ◽  
Barbara Boone ◽  
René Verdonk

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-An Zhang ◽  
Chun-Hao Zhou ◽  
Xiang-Qing Meng ◽  
Jia Fang ◽  
Cheng-He Qin

Abstract Background The incidence of intramedullary infection is increasing with the frequent application of intramedullary fixations on long bone fractures in latest decades. However, appropriate treatment for those special infection remains a challenge. The aims of this study were to assess the efficiency of our treatment protocols: intramedullary nail removal, medullary canal reaming and irrigation, followed by antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation with or without distraction osteogenesis, for the treatment of infection after intramedullary nailing. Methods From 2014 to 2017, a total of 19 patients with intramedullary infection were treated in our center, with means of intramedullary nail removal, distal diaphysis fenestration, medullary canal reaming and irrigation, antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation, followed by distraction osteogenesis in 9 cases to repair bone defect. The infection remission rate, infection recurrence rate and post-operative complications rate were assessed during the follow-up. Results All of patients gained satisfactory outcomes with an average follow-up of 38.1 (24 to 55months). 94.7% (18/19) patients achieved infection remission after surgical treatment. 5.3% (1/19) patient developed reinfection, but healed at the end of follow up with re-debridement. 9 patients with surgery-related bone defects received bone transport and successfully restored the length of involved limbs, with a mean transport duration of 10.7 months (range, 6.7 to 19.5months). Majority of patients achieved pain free and full weight bearing during the follow-up. Postoperative complications mainly included prolonged aseptic draining (36.8%, 7/19) and refracture (5.3%, 1/19), which were successfully managed by regular dressing and refixation. Conclusion Intramedullary nail removal, canal reaming and irrigation in associated with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation (with or without distraction osteogenesis) were effective in the treatment of infection after intramedullary nailing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document