Treatment of the 40-years old hypertrophic pseudarthrosis of the humeral shaft after breaking of the intramedullary nail – removal of the intramedullary fixation using Ender rod. Original modification of the method

2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Jan Poszepczyński ◽  
◽  
Andrzej Kaźmierczyk ◽  
Krzysztof Andrzejewski ◽  
Łukasz Okulski ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Amr A. Abdelgawad ◽  
Enes Kanlic

Nonunion of long bones fixed with nails may result in implant failure. Removal of a broken intramedullary nail may be a real challenge. Many methods have been described to allow for removal of the broken piece of the nail. In this paper, we are reviewing the different techniques to extract a broken nail, classifying them into different subsets, and describing a new technique that we used to remove a broken tibial nail with narrow canal. Eight different categories of implant removal methods were described, with different methods within each category. This classification is very comprehensive and was never described before. We described a new technique (hook captured in the medulla by flexible nail introduced from the locking hole) which is a valuable technique in cases of nail of a small diameter where other methods cannot be used because of the narrow canal of the nail. Our eight categories for broken nail removal methods simplify the concepts of nail removal and allow the surgeon to better plan for the removal procedure.


1984 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 639-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Stern ◽  
D A Mattingly ◽  
D L Pomeroy ◽  
E J Zenni ◽  
J K Kreig

Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S10
Author(s):  
C. Bardas ◽  
H. Benea ◽  
D. Oltean ◽  
M. Paiusan ◽  
R. Tomoaia ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanbin Ouyang ◽  
Jun Xiong ◽  
Peng Xiang ◽  
Zhuang Cui ◽  
Liguang Chen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-An Zhang ◽  
Chun-Hao Zhou ◽  
Xiang-Qing Meng ◽  
Jia Fang ◽  
Cheng-He Qin

Abstract Background: The incidence of intramedullary infection is increasing with increased use of intramedullary fixation for long bone fractures. However, appropriate treatment for infection after intramedullary nailing is unclear. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our treatment protocol for infection after intramedullary nailing: intramedullary nail removal, local debridement, reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation with or without segmental bone resection and distraction osteogenesis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with an infection after intramedullary nailing treated from 2014 to 2017 at our center. Patients with follow-up of less than 24 months, received other treatment methods, or those with serious medical conditions were excluded from the analysis. Patients met the criteria were treated as described above, followed by distraction osteogenesis in 9 cases to repair bone defect. The infection remission rate, infection recurrence rate, and post-operative complication rates were assessed. Results: A total of 19 patients were included in the analysis. All of patients had satisfactory outcomes with an average follow-up of 38.1 ± 9.4 months (range, 24 to 55months). Eighteen patients (94.7%) achieved infection remission; 1 patient (5.3%) developed a reinfection that resolved after repeat debridement. Nine patients with bone defects (average size 4.7 ± 1.3 cm; range, 3.3 to 7.6 cm) were treated with bone transport which successfully restored the length of involved limb. The mean bone transport duration was 10.7 ± 4.0 months (range, 6.7 to 19.5 months). The majority of patients achieved full weight bearing and became pain free during the follow-up period. Postoperative complications mainly included prolonged aseptic drainage (7/19; 36.8%), re-fracture (1/19; 5.3%) and joint stiffness, which were successfully managed by regular dressing changes and re-fixation, respectively. Conclusion: Intramedullary nail removal, canal reaming and irrigation, and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate implantation (with or without distraction osteogenesis) is effective for treating infections after intramedullary nailing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Genta Fukumoto ◽  
Tomoaki Fukui ◽  
Keisuke Oe ◽  
Atsuyuki Inui ◽  
Yutaka Mifune ◽  
...  

Introduction. Although the recommended treatment for humeral shaft nonunion is compression plating with autologous bone grafting, we treated a case of humeral shaft nonunion with an intramedullary nail (IMN) without bone grafting. Presentation of Case. Osteosynthesis with IMN was performed on a 24-year-old man with a humeral shaft fracture at another hospital. However, bony union was not obtained 1 year after the first surgery, and he was referred to our institution. We treated the nonunion with exchange nailing without autologous bone grafting using compression function of the nail, leading to bony union at 7 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up 2 years and 4 months postoperatively, the patient had full range of motion in the left shoulder and elbow joints. Discussion. Compression plating with autologous bone grafting is reported to be the gold standard for the treatment of humeral shaft nonunion. IMN is advantageous for minimal invasion; however, the conventional type of IMN cannot apply compression force between fragments and does not have sufficient stability against rotational force. In this case, we used an IMN that could apply compression between the fragments and which had rotational stability via many screws. We did not perform bone grafting because the current nonunion was adjudged to be biologically active, and we achieved good functional results. Conclusion. We treated humeral shaft nonunion using IMN with compression, but without bone grafting, leading to successful clinical outcomes. This strategy might be an appropriate choice for the treatment of humeral shaft nonunion with biological activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document