13.4 An Evidence-Based Intervention Approach for Girls With Disruptive Behavior Disorders Living in Residential Facilities

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. S277-S278
Author(s):  
Christina Stadler
Author(s):  
Steiner Hans ◽  
Daniels Whitney ◽  
Kelly Michael ◽  
Stadler Christina

This chapter maps evidence-based interventions on the biopsychosocial model of causation suggested by the current evidence. Medications and biological treatments are still second-line interventions, which should be considered only if there is insufficient progress with psychological and social-familial treatments. There is very little progress in the past decade in testing medication interventions. New findings from neuroscience suggest another subtype of disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs), which holds considerable promise to improve outcomes in this treatment category. Psychological treatments are best supported by the evidence, especially when delivered in manualized form with a high degree of treatment fidelity. Familial and community-based interventions are also well supported, especially in complex, severe and chronic cases. There is a dearth of intervention studies targeting the different phenotypes of antisocial and aggressive behavior and studies of integrated treatment However, many studies are now available that approach treatment from a medical evidence–based rather than criminological perspective.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Vanscoyoc ◽  
Catherine Stanger ◽  
Alan J. Budney ◽  
Jeff D. Thostenson

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaleel Abdul-Adil ◽  
David A. Meyerson ◽  
Corinn Elmore ◽  
A. David Farmer ◽  
Karen Taylor-Crawford

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Polanco ◽  
Marjorine Henriquez ◽  
Kimberly Mantilla ◽  
Perla Corredor ◽  
Jacqueline Rodriguez ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind H. Baker ◽  
Roberta L. Clanton ◽  
Jack C. Rogers ◽  
Stéphane A. De Brito

Decades of research have shown that youths with disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) are a heterogeneous population. Over the past 20 years, researchers have distinguished youths with DBD as those displaying high (DBD/HCU) versus low (DBD/LCU) callous-unemotional (CU) traits. These traits include flat affect and reduced empathy and remorse, and are associated with more severe, varied, and persistent patterns of antisocial behavior and aggression. Conduct problems in youths with HCU and LCU are thought to reflect distinct causal vulnerabilities, with antisocial behavior in youths with DBD/HCU reflecting a predominantly genetic etiology, while antisocial behavior in youths with DBD/LCU is associated primarily with environmental influences. Here we selectively review recent functional (fMRI) and structural (sMRI) magnetic resonance imaging research on DBD, focusing particularly on the role of CU traits. First, fMRI studies examining the neural correlates of affective stimuli, emotional face processing, empathy, theory of mind, morality, and decision-making in DBD are discussed. This is followed by a review of the studies investigating brain structure and structural connectivity in DBD. Next, we highlight the need to further investigate females and the role of sex differences in this population. We conclude the review by identifying potential clinical implications of this research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document