4.26 SUSTAINED AMYGDALA RESPONSE TO FEARFUL FACES IN DEPRESSED ADOLESCENTS WITH CHILDHOOD MALTREATMENT

Author(s):  
Akul Sharma ◽  
Theo G.M. Van Erp ◽  
Kiana Scambray ◽  
Robert Jirsaraie ◽  
Megan Faulkner ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Ohrmann ◽  
Astrid Veronika Rauch ◽  
Jochen Bauer ◽  
Harald Kugel ◽  
Volker Arolt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 102441
Author(s):  
Vivien Günther ◽  
Anja Hußlack ◽  
Anna-Sophie Weil ◽  
Anna Bujanow ◽  
Jeanette Henkelmann ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1565-1582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda E. Guyer ◽  
Christopher S. Monk ◽  
Erin B. McClure-Tone ◽  
Eric E. Nelson ◽  
Roxann Roberson-Nay ◽  
...  

Several lines of evidence implicate the amygdala in face-emotion processing, particularly for fearful facial expressions. Related findings suggest that face-emotion processing engages the amygdala within an interconnected circuitry that can be studied using a functional-connectivity approach. Past work also underscores important functional changes in the amygdala during development. Taken together, prior research on amygdala function and development reveals a need for more work examining developmental changes in the amygdala's response to fearful faces and in amygdala functional connectivity during face processing. The present study used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare 31 adolescents (9–17 years old) and 30 adults (21–40 years old) on activation to fearful faces in the amygdala and other regions implicated in face processing. Moreover, these data were used to compare patterns of amygdala functional connectivity in adolescents and adults. During passive viewing, adolescents demonstrated greater amygdala and fusiform activation to fearful faces than did adults. Functional connectivity analysis revealed stronger connectivity between the amygdala and the hippocampus in adults than in adolescents. Within each group, variability in age did not correlate with amygdala response, and sex-related developmental differences in amygdala response were not found. Eye movement data collected outside of the magnetic resonance imaging scanner using the same task suggested that developmental differences in amygdala activation were not attributable to differences in eye-gaze patterns. Amygdala hyperactivation in response to fearful faces may explain increased vulnerability to affective disorders in adolescence; stronger amygdala-hippocampus connectivity in adults than adolescents may reflect maturation in learning or habituation to facial expressions.


2008 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 2364-2370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziz U.R. Asghar ◽  
Yi-Chieh Chiu ◽  
Glyn Hallam ◽  
Siwei Liu ◽  
Hannah Mole ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 180 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshan Cools ◽  
Andy J. Calder ◽  
Andrew D. Lawrence ◽  
Luke Clark ◽  
Ed Bullmore ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Justin Kim ◽  
Rebecca A. Loucks ◽  
Maital Neta ◽  
F. Caroline Davis ◽  
Jonathan A. Oler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1209-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Neumeister ◽  
K. Feldker ◽  
C. Y. Heitmann ◽  
C. Buff ◽  
L. Brinkmann ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundAltered amygdala activation to fear-related stimuli has been proposed to be a potential neural correlate of heightened threat sensitivity in anxiety- and stress-related disorders. However, the role of stimulus awareness and disorder specificity remains widely unclear. Here we investigated amygdala responses to conscious and unconscious fearful faces in patients suffering from panic disorder (PD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and in a large sample of healthy controls (HC).MethodsDuring event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging participants (n = 120; 20 PD, 20 GAD, 20 PTSD, 60 HC) were confronted with briefly presented fearful faces, neutral faces, and non-faces in a backward masking paradigm. The design allowed for the analysis of trial-by-trial face detection performance and amygdala responses to fearful v. neutral faces.ResultsAll participants exhibited increased amygdala activation to fearful v. neutral faces during conscious trials. Specifically during unconscious face processing, the PTSD, compared with all other groups, showed higher right basolateral (BLA) amygdala activity to fearful v. neutral faces.ConclusionsThe present study shows that BLA amygdala hyperactivity during unconscious, but not conscious, processing of fearful faces differentiates PTSD from the investigated disorders. This finding suggests an automatic and specific neural hyper-responsivity to general fear cues in PTSD and supports the idea of categorical differences between PTSD and other anxiety-related disorders.


2007 ◽  
Vol 190 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Norbury ◽  
Clare E. Mackay ◽  
Philip J. Cowen ◽  
Guy M. Goodwin ◽  
Catherine J. Harmer

SummaryWe used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the effects of short-term treatment with reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, on emotional facial processing in healthy volunteers. Reboxetine was associated with a reduced amygdala response to fearful faces and increased activation to happy v. neutral facial expressions in the right fusiform gyrus, relative to placebo treatment and in the absence of changes in mood. Our results show that reboxetine modulates the neural substrates of emotional processing, highlighting a mechanism by which drug treatment could normalise negative bias in depression and anxiety.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document