facial processing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

60
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
TianHong Zhang ◽  
YingYu Yang ◽  
LiHua Xu ◽  
XiaoChen Tang ◽  
YeGang Hu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Narjes Soltani Dehaghani ◽  
◽  
Burkhard Maess ◽  
Reza Khosrowabadi ◽  
Mojtaba Zarei ◽  
...  

Faces can be speedily processed, although they convey an immense amount of information. Hence, in psychophysiological experiments, human faces constitute very special stimuli! Numerous studies have investigated the electrophysiological correlates of face processing, showing the existence of multiple event-related components. Nevertheless, dissimilarities in various levels of processing are still controversial. In this present study, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to examine how facial processing is different in perception and recognition from object processing and also determined 95% confidence interval for the onset and peak time of the effects we found. Our results confirm the face-selectivity for the M170 component, but not always for the M100 component. Additionally, we observed a unique speed pattern for the M170 component in perception and recognition both at the onset and the peak time.


Perception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 672-687
Author(s):  
V. Harrison ◽  
G. Hole ◽  
Ruth Habibi

Previous research has demonstrated several own-group biases (OGBs) in face recognition, but why they occur is unclear. Social–cognitive accounts suggest they stem from differential attention and facial processing, following the categorisation of a face as belonging to an “in” or “out” group. Three studies explored whether OGBs can be produced by mere categorisation at encoding and investigated the role of in-group membership saliency on face recognition. Participants saw 40 facial images fictionally grouped according to in-/out-group status. Studies 1 and 2 used university membership as the grouping variable and found no evidence of an OGB, and no relationship between OGB magnitude and salience of group membership. Study 3 used the same design as Study 2, but with a highly salient group characteristic: participants’ stance on the U.K. Referendum (i.e., whether they were “Leave” or “Remain” supporters). In this case, an asymmetrical OGB was found, with only Remain voters demonstrating an OGB. Furthermore, a relationship between OGB magnitude and attitude toward the Referendum result was found. Overall, our results suggest that social categorisation and membership saliency alone may not be enough to moderate in- and out-group face recognition. However, when sufficiently polarised groups are used as in-/out-group categories, OGBs may occur.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S134-S135
Author(s):  
Yujie Wen ◽  
Xianbin Li ◽  
Qing Tian ◽  
Wenpeng Hou ◽  
Xueqi Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left-behind children(LBC has experienced parent-child separation, which is a special parent-child separation and social isolation model. Adverse events in early development may have important effects on the development of the nervous system, including the influence on sensory and perceptual cognitive processing, thus increasing the susceptibility to mental illness. Meanwhile, there are various neurological and brain root causes behind left-behind children’s learning difficulties, non-socialization and other psychological behavior problems. In addition, left-behind may have sensory, perceptual and cognitive processing abnormalities. This study tries to elaborate and extract the eye movement characteristics of left-behind children, lay a foundation for the discussion of the mechanism of abnormal visual processing, and provide a scientific basis for follow-up of left-behind children and the early identification, prevention and control of mental diseases. Methods The standards for grouping left-behind children are as follows: the children who are separated from both parents 6 months after birth and spend less than 2 months with their parents each month, and the non-left-behind children with matched gender, age and education years, exclusion criteria is: neurological diseases, family history of mental illness, broken family (single parent, bereavement), high myopia (greater than 1000 degrees), eye and eyelash cannot be identified by infrared light. EyeControl portable eye movement tester (built-in infrared, speed: 100Hz, error <0.5°) developed by Qingtech and its software processing system were used. The subjects’ eye movements and various analysis indexes in various tasks were collected. The eye movement indexes of smooth pursuit eye movement, fixation stability and free browsing were collected, so as to investigate the effects of left-behind on static attention retention, visual tracking and face recognition in social scenes. Results Among the 175 children, the smooth tracking mean deviation of LBC is significantly increased (P=0.017). The mean deviation of the O and S-curve tracking of the LBC is significantly increased (P=0.018; P=0.034), and the OS curve mean deviation and hyperactivity correlated (r=-0.273, P=0.011). In terms of the time that peak deviation takes (F=4.329, P=0.014), there is significant interaction between the age groups and the left-behind groups. In the social scenes, the first fixation time of face (P=0.039), the number of eye entry count (P=0.020), and the eye fixation time (P=0.003) of LBC are all significantly reduced, and the number of mouth entry count (P=0.007) and the number of fixation (P=0.023) of LBC are all significantly increased. Under the circumstance of low facial processing, there is a significant difference between LBC and NLBC (P=0.009), and that difference is not significant under the circumstance of high facial processing, and there is a significant difference between low facial processing LBC and high facial processing NLBC (P=0.007). Discussion Left-behind children have obstacles in dynamic visual information processing, insufficient inhibition and control, and poor cognitive flexibility, which may be related to hyperactivity. The attention retention in visual tracking decreased with the increase of age. Left-behind children have difficulties in face recognition in social scenes. In the case of low facial processing, left-behind children aggravated the defects of speech comprehension, while in the case of high facial processing, left-behind children had no significant influence on speech comprehension. Therefore, we should intervene the left-behind children in the early days, and this study provides a scientific basis for the formulation of social policies.


Neuroscience ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 406 ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Direito ◽  
João Lima ◽  
Marco Simões ◽  
Alexandre Sayal ◽  
Teresa Sousa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsie Ong ◽  
Rick Law Tsz Chun

<p>The manuscript is titled ‘Emotional facial processing: does cognitive load make a difference?’ and it describes a research study that measures how emotion and distraction of different cognitive loads may impact working memory performance. The findings show that cognitive load on working memory performance, with poorer working memory performance in the high compared to the low level of distraction. However, no effects of emotional faces were found on task performance. The work therefore has significance with regard to cognitive processing and working memory span.</p>


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsie Ong ◽  
Rick Law Tsz Chun

<p>The manuscript is titled ‘Emotional facial processing: does cognitive load make a difference?’ and it describes a research study that measures how emotion and distraction of different cognitive loads may impact working memory performance. The findings show that cognitive load on working memory performance, with poorer working memory performance in the high compared to the low level of distraction. However, no effects of emotional faces were found on task performance. The work therefore has significance with regard to cognitive processing and working memory span.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document