25363 Serious infections and infections related to study drug and leading to discontinuation through 5 years of tildrakizumab exposure in 2 phase 3 clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. AB56
Author(s):  
Kurt Gebauer ◽  
Eingun James Song ◽  
Alan M. Mendelsohn ◽  
Stephen J. Rozzo ◽  
Dario Kivelevitch
2021 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. AB56
Author(s):  
Adam Friedman ◽  
Ronald B. Vender ◽  
Mital Desai ◽  
Alan M. Mendelsohn ◽  
Stephen J. Rozzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S649-S650
Author(s):  
Miki Takemura ◽  
Yoshinori Yamano ◽  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Mari Ariyasu ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a novel siderophore cephalosporin developed to treat serious carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative (GN) infections. Methods In CREDIBLE-CR (NCT02714595), adults with serious infections caused by CR GN pathogens received CFDC 2 g, q8h, 3-h infusion, or best available therapy (BAT). In APEKS-NP (NCT03032380), adults with nosocomial pneumonia received CFDC or high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem (each 2 g, q8h, 3-h infusion). All treatments were given for 7‒14 days (extendable to 21 days). Biospecimens were collected before the first dose of study drug and at subsequent visits for assessments, and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) to various antibiotics, including CFDC and carbapenems, were determined. Isolates with an increased MIC were evaluated by RT-PCR or whole genome sequencing (WGS) for CFDC resistance-related genes or mutations. Results for genetically related isolates with an elevated MIC during therapy are shown. Results On-therapy ≥4-fold CFDC MIC increase was found in 12 out of 106 (CREDIBLE-CR; Table 1) and 7 out of 159 (APEKS-NP; Table 2) isolates, respectively. For most isolates, CFDC MIC increased by 4–8-fold but remained ≤4 µg/mL. Specific mutations which could explain CFDC MIC increases were found in only 3 isolates. Mutations in iron-transport related genes were not identified. Mutation in CFDC target gene PBP-3 was identified in 1 A. baumannii isolate. Class-C enzyme mutation was observed in 2 isolates (CREDIBLE-CR: PDC-30 in P. aeruginosa; APEKS-NP: ACT-17 in E. cloacae), although the contribution to CFDC MIC increase has not been confirmed. In the BAT arm in CREDIBLE-CR, 6 out of 46 isolates had ≥4-fold MIC increase; all post-treatment isolates were resistant to BAT agents (Table 1), although WGS was not conducted for these isolates. In the meropenem arm in APEKS-NP, 5 out of 164 isolates had ≥4-fold MIC increase (Table 2). Table 1. MIC changes in CREDIBLE-CR Table 2. MIC changes in APEKS-NP Conclusion Among isolates with ≥4-fold MIC increase during CFDC treatment, actual CFDC MIC values remained relatively low for most isolates. Frequency of MIC increase in BAT or meropenem arms was similar to that of CFDC, but the magnitude was greater. Acquisition of contributory mechanism has not been identified except for the mutation in PBP 3 and some β-lactamases. Disclosures Miki Takemura, MSc, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Yoshinori Yamano, PhD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Yuko Matsunaga, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Employee) Mari Ariyasu, BPharm, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee) Roger Echols, MD, Shionogi Inc. (Consultant) Tsutae Den Nagata, MD, Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Employee)


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-263
Author(s):  
Maria Y. Egorova ◽  
Irina A. Shuvalova ◽  
Olga I. Zvonareva ◽  
Igor D. Pimenov ◽  
Olga S. Kobyakova ◽  
...  

Background. The organization of clinical trials (CTs) requires the participation and coordination of healthcare providers, patients, public and private parties. Obstacles to the participation of any of these groups pose a risk of lowering the potential for the implementation of CTs. Researchers are a key human resource in conducting of CT. Their motivation for participation can have a significant impact on the recruitment and retention of patients, on the quality of the data collected, which determines the overall outcome of the study. Aims to assess the factors affecting the inclusion of Russian physicians-researchers in CT, and to determine their role in relations with patients-participants. Materials and methods. The study was organized as a part of the Russian multicenter face-to-face study. A survey was conducted of researchers from 10 cities of Russia (20172018). The participation in the survey for doctors was anonymous and voluntary. Results. The study involved 78 respondents. Most research doctors highly value the importance of research for science (4,84 0,39), society (4,67 0,46) and slightly lower for participating patients (4,44 0,61). The expectations of medical researchers are related to improving their financial situation and attaining new experience (n = 14; 18,18%). However, the opportunity to work with new technologies of treatment and diagnosis (n = 41; 52,56%) acted as a motivating factor. According to the questionnaire, the vast majority of research doctors (n = 29; 37,18%) believe that the main reason for patients to participate in CT is to receive quality and free medical care. The most significant obstacle to the inclusion of participants in CT was the side effects of the study drug (n = 38; 48,71%). Conclusions. The potential of clinical researchers in Russia is very high. The patient-participant acts for the research doctor as the subject of the study, and not the object, so the well-being of the patient is not indifferent to the doctor. However, the features of the functioning of our health care system form the motivation of doctors-researchers (additional earnings, professional self-development) and the way they perceive the motivation of patients (CT as an opportunity to receive quality medical care).


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S40
Author(s):  
P Van de Kerkhof ◽  
A Pinter ◽  
M Boehnlein ◽  
S Kavanagh ◽  
J.J. Crowley

Abstract not available.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-219
Author(s):  
Robyn J. Barst

Drug development is the entire process of introducing a new drug to the market. It involves drug discovery, screening, preclinical testing, an Investigational New Drug (IND) application in the US or a Clinical Trial Application (CTA) in the EU, phase 1–3 clinical trials, a New Drug Application (NDA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review and approval, and postapproval studies required for continuing safety evaluation. Preclinical testing assesses safety and biologic activity, phase 1 determines safety and dosage, phase 2 evaluates efficacy and side effects, and phase 3 confirms efficacy and monitors adverse effects in a larger number of patients. Postapproval studies provide additional postmarketing data. On average, it takes 15 years from preclinical studies to regulatory approval by the FDA: about 3.5–6.5 years for preclinical, 1–1.5 years for phase 1, 2 years for phase 2, 3–3.5 years for phase 3, and 1.5–2.5 years for filing the NDA and completing the FDA review process. Of approximately 5000 compounds evaluated in preclinical studies, about 5 compounds enter clinical trials, and 1 compound is approved (Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, 2011). Most drug development programs include approximately 35–40 phase 1 studies, 15 phase 2 studies, and 3–5 pivotal trials with more than 5000 patients enrolled. Thus, to produce safe and effective drugs in a regulated environment is a highly complex process. Against this backdrop, what is the best way to develop drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), an orphan disease often rapidly fatal within several years of diagnosis and in which spontaneous regression does not occur?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document