scholarly journals GW25-e1740 Contributing Factors of Weight Regain after Weight Loss in Ahvaz, Iran

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (16) ◽  
pp. C107
Author(s):  
Majid Karandish ◽  
Nayere Esmaeil Kaboli ◽  
Hamed Tabesh
Author(s):  
Katelyn J. Carey ◽  
Wendy Vitek

AbstractObesity, dieting, and weight cycling are common among reproductive-age women. Weight cycling refers to intentional weight loss followed by unintentional weight regain. Weight loss is accompanied by changes in gut peptides, adipose hormones, and energy expenditure that promote weight regain to a tightly regulated set point. While weight loss can improve body composition and surrogate markers of cardiometabolic health, it is hypothesized that the weight regain can result in an overshoot effect, resulting in excess weight gain, altered body composition, and negative effects on surrogate markers of cardiometabolic health. Numerous observational studies have examined the association of weight cycling and health outcomes. There appears to be modest association between weight cycling with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia in women, but no association with hypertension, cardiovascular events, and overall cancer risk. Interestingly, mild weight cycling may be associated with a decreased risk of overall and cardiovascular mortality. Little is known about the effects of weight cycling in the preconception period. Although obesity and weight gain are associated with pregnancy complications, preconception weight loss does not appear to mitigate the risk of most pregnancy complications related to obesity. Research on preconception weight cycling may provide insight into this paradox.


Author(s):  
Miguel H. Malespin ◽  
Alfred Sidney Barritt ◽  
Stephanie E. Watkins ◽  
Cheryl Schoen ◽  
Monica A. Tincopa ◽  
...  

Obesity ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roel G. Vink ◽  
Nadia J. T. Roumans ◽  
Laura A. J. Arkenbosch ◽  
Edwin C. M. Mariman ◽  
Marleen A. van Baak

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 3-4
Author(s):  
E.M. Baarends ◽  
E.C. Creutzberg ◽  
E.F.M. Wouters ◽  
A.M.W.J. Schols

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Abbas Sabry ◽  
Karim Sabry Abd-Elsamee ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Mohamed ◽  
Mohammed Mohamed Ahmed Abd-Elsalam

Abstract Background It is already known that Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained popularity as a stand-alone procedure with good short-term results for weight loss. However, in the long-term, weight regain is considered as a complication. Demand for secondary surgery is rising, partly for this reason, but through that study we try to discover the efficacy of conversion of failed sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) regarding weight loss and metabolic outcomes. Objective To asses the efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) as a conversion surgery post Sleeve Gastrectomy failure as regard weight loss and metabolic outcomes. Patients and Methods This study is a retrospective cohort study which included 20 patients underwent one anastomosis gastric bypass at Ain-Shams University El-Demerdash Hospital, Cairo, Egypt and specialized bariatric center, Cairo, Egypt From February 2019 to July 2019 with 6 months of postoperative follow up till January 2019. Results In this study, we reviewed and analyzed the outcomes from the revision of the SG due to either inadequate weight loss or weight regain to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with %EBWL of 6.65% at 1 month, 13.61 % at 3 months and 20.86% at 6 months. Conclusion OAGB appears to be an effective and safe therapeutic technique as a revisional surgery for failed primary SG with good short-term results for treating morbid obesity and its associated comorbidities with a significantly low rate of complications. However the EBWL was less than what is reported after primary OAGB weight. Multicenter studies with larger series of patients and longer term follow up after SG revisions to OAGB are warranted.


Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha E Berger ◽  
Gordon S Huggins ◽  
Jeanne M McCaffery ◽  
Alice H Lichtenstein

Introduction: The development of type 2 diabetes is strongly associated with excess weight gain and can often be partially ameliorated or reversed by weight loss. While many lifestyle interventions have resulted in successful weight loss, strategies to maintain the weight loss have been considerably less successful. Prior studies have identified multiple predictors of weight regain, but none have synthesized them into one analytic stream. Methods: We developed a prediction model of 4-year weight regain after a one-year lifestyle-induced weight loss intervention followed by a 3 year maintenance intervention in 1791 overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes from the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) trial who lost ≥3% of initial weight by the end of year 1. Weight regain was defined as regaining <50% of the weight lost during the intervention by year 4. Using machine learning we integrated factors from several domains, including demographics, psychosocial metrics, health status and behaviors (e.g. physical activity, self-monitoring, medication use and intervention adherence). We used classification trees and stochastic gradient boosting with 10-fold cross validation to develop and internally validate the prediction model. Results: At the end of four years, 928 individuals maintained ≥50% of their initial weight lost (maintainers), whereas 863 did not met that criterion (regainers). We identified an interaction between age and several variables in the model, as well as percent initial weight loss. Several factors were significant predictors of weight regain based on variable importance plots, regardless of age or initial weight loss, such as insurance status, physical function score, baseline BMI, meal replacement use and minutes of exercise recorded during year 1. We also identified several factors that were significant predictors depending on age group (45-55y/ 56-65y/66-76y) and initial weight loss (lost 3-9% vs. ≥10% of initial weight). When the variables identified from machine learning were added to a logistic regression model stratified by age and initial weight loss groups, the models showed good prediction (3-9% initial weight loss, ages 45-55y (n=293): ROC AUC=0.78; ≥10% initial weight loss, ages 45-55y (n=242): ROC AUC=0.78; (3-9% initial weight loss, ages 56-65y (n=484): ROC AUC=0.70; ≥10% initial weight loss, ages 56-65y (n=455): ROC AUC = 0.74; 3-9% initial weight loss, ages 66-76y (n=150): ROC AUC=0.84; ≥10% initial weight loss, ages 66-76y (n=167): ROC AUC=0.86). Conclusion: The combination of machine learning methodology and logistic regression generates a prediction model that can consider numerous factors simultaneously, can be used to predict weight regain in other populations and can assist in the development of better strategies to prevent post-loss regain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document