Does the False Negative Rate for 1 or 2 Negative Sentinel Nodes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Translate into a High Local Recurrence Rate?

2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. S35-S36
Author(s):  
Darren B. Sachs ◽  
Nicole M. Melchior ◽  
Salvatore Nardello ◽  
Mengying Deng ◽  
Elin R. Sigurdson ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
chenxi yuan ◽  
xinzhao wang ◽  
zhaoyun liu ◽  
chao li ◽  
mengxue bian ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) acts as a vital role in the breast cancer surgery, and the identified number of sentinel nodes determines its accuracy to represent the status of axillae. There remain two tumor biopsy modes in breast cancer, preoperative and intraoperative biopsy. We compared the effect of the two different biopsies on the result of SLNB. Methods Patients with clinical stage T1-3, N0 tumor were enrolled in this study. 53% received preoperative tumor biopsy and 47% received intraoperative excisional biopsy. For search of the sentinel lymph node, patients received dual tracer injection. The number of SLNs detected and false negative rate were compared between groups. Results 204 patients were enrolled, 108 received preoperative tumor biopsy and 96 received intraoperative excisional biopsy. Among all the patients, 160 received ALND following SLNB. Preoperative tumor biopsy detected more SLNs than intraoperative biopsy (mean rank 113.87 vs. 90.9, p= 0.004). False negative rate in preoperative and intraoperative tumor biopsy was 3% and 18%, respectively. Conclusions Patients in preoperative tumor biopsy group could find more SLNs than intraoperative biopsy patients. False negative rate was also lower in preoperative biopsy group.


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 2847-2852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maiko Takahashi ◽  
Hiromitsu Jinno ◽  
Tetsu Hayashida ◽  
Michio Sakata ◽  
Keiko Asakura ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1108-1108
Author(s):  
Vani Parmar ◽  
Nita S. Nair ◽  
Rohini W Hawaldar ◽  
Vaibhav Vanmali ◽  
Aruna Laxman Prabhu ◽  
...  

1108 Background: Post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is not a standard of care due to the wide variability in false negative rate (FNR), varying from 5.7% to 33%. In operable breast cancer (OBC), FNR of less than 10% is acceptable. We attempted to find out the reliability of low axillary sampling(LAS), with dissection limited below the first intercostobrachial nerve, to correctly identify the node negative axilla in the post NACT clinically node negative (N0) patients. Methods: Women with large operable (LOBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), post-NACT clinically N0, underwent concomitant blue dye-colloid guided SNB and LAS. The identification rate, FNR, and negative predictive value (NPV) of both procedures were compared. Results: Post-NACT 209 eligible women underwent combined LAS and SNB procedure. At presentation, the tumors were large (median 5.0 cm) with 70% clinically palpable nodes. All patients received 4 cycles of neo-adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy and were clinically node negative after chemotherapy. SNB was defined as blue and/or hot node plus palpable node(s). A blue or hot node (median 2 nodes) was identified in 93.8%, and median of 5 sentinel nodes were removed. The false negative rate of SNB was 15.3% (95% CI 8.7%-25.3%). The LAS technique comparatively had nodal yield in 98.5% with median 8 nodes removed; and FNR 8.5% (95% CI, 4.2%-16.6%, p=0.19). Comparative NPV for LAS and SNB were 94.6% and 91.8% respectively. Conclusions: Axillary sampling results for FNR and NPV are similar if not superior to SNB and could be a reliable method of axillary nodal evaluation in advanced breast cancers following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document