scholarly journals Survival After Margin-Positive Resection in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Do Patients Still Benefit?

Author(s):  
Amanda K. Arrington ◽  
Chiu-Hsieh Hsu ◽  
Kenzie L. Schaefer ◽  
Catherine L. O’Grady ◽  
Mohammad Khreiss ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Asmita Chopra ◽  
Mazen Zenati ◽  
Melissa E. Hogg ◽  
Herbert J. Zeh ◽  
David L. Bartlett ◽  
...  

ISRN Surgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Friedrich Wellner ◽  
Frank Makowiec ◽  
Dirk Bausch ◽  
Jens Höppner ◽  
Olivia Sick ◽  
...  

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive disease with poor survival. The only effective therapy offering long-term survival is complete surgical resection. In the setting of nonmetastatic disease, locally advanced tumors constitute a technical challenge to the surgeon and may result in margin-positive resection margins. Few studies have evaluated the implications of the latter in depth. The aim of this study was to compare the margin-positive situation to palliative bypass procedures and margin-negative resections in terms of perioperative and long-term outcome. By retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data from 360 patients operated for pancreatic cancer at our institution, we provide evidence that margin-positive resection still yields a significant survival benefit over palliative bypass procedures. At the same time, perioperative severe morbidity and mortality are not significantly increased. Our observations suggest that pancreatic cancer should be resected whenever technically feasible, including, cases of locally advanced disease.


ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e000282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Torgeson ◽  
Ignacio Garrido-Laguna ◽  
Randa Tao ◽  
George M Cannon ◽  
Courtney L Scaife ◽  
...  

BackgroundSurgical resection remains the best chance at long-term survival in pancreatic cancer, though margin-positive resections are associated with diminished survival. We examined the effect of margin-positive resection on survival, as well as the role and timing of additional therapies through the National Cancer Database (NCDB).Patients and methodsPatients with stage IIA–III pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 were identified in NCDB. Survival was compared using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling for patients who underwent surgery with negative (R0), microscopically positive (R1) and macroscopically positive (R2) margins or non-surgical treatment. We further analysed patients by margin status, timing of additional therapy (neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) vs adjuvant therapy (AT) vs none) and clinical stage.ResultsWe analysed 44 852 patients. Median survival (MS) for patients who did not undergo surgery was 10.3 months, compared with 19.7 months for R0 (P<0.001), 14.3 months for R1 (P<0.001) and 9.8 months (P=0.07) for R2 resections. NAT (MS 23.2 months) was associated with improved survival compared with AT (MS 21.5 months) in negative-margin patients and equivalent (MS 17.6 months) to AT (MS 16.8 months) in positive-margin patients. Survival for stage III NAT positive-margin patients (MS 19.8 months) was equivalent to AT after negative margins (MS 18.4 months, P=1.00). Improved R0 rates were seen with NAT (88% vs 81%, P<0.001), especially in stage III patients (85% vs 59%, P<0.001).ConclusionR1 resections portend poorer survival than R0 but do not negate the benefit of surgery when additional therapy is given. NAT was associated with improved R0 rates and improved survival for stage III positive-margin patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 396-397
Author(s):  
C.M. Vollmer ◽  
A. Mahadevan ◽  
T.S. Kent ◽  
M.P. Callery

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (20) ◽  
pp. 4532-4537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jo Chua ◽  
David Cunningham

There are relatively few randomized studies of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer 1 (ESPAC1) trial is the largest study of adjuvant treatment to date. The results of ESPAC1 are discussed in the context of other evidence from previous randomized studies, which have also been combined in a meta-analysis. Overall, the existing data show a clear benefit for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, which has not been demonstrated for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The subgroup of patients with resection margin positive disease did seem to benefit less from adjuvant chemotherapy, and showed a trend towards improved survival with chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be evaluated further in this latter group of patients. The optimal chemotherapy regimen for use as adjuvant treatment is the subject of ongoing trials. Other strategies which should be explored include neoadjuvant treatment and the incorporation of novel targeted agents into management.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A162-A162
Author(s):  
A KUTUP ◽  
S HOSCH ◽  
S PAPE ◽  
P SCHEUNEMANN ◽  
W KNOEFEL ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A610-A610
Author(s):  
D LEE ◽  
J LEE ◽  
S JEONG ◽  
K KWON ◽  
W CHOI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document