Evaluating Food Access and Nutrition Education Needs among Food Pantry Clients from a Latinx Micro-Community in Rural Appalachia

2021 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. A89
Author(s):  
M. Gutschall ◽  
A. Farris ◽  
A. Hege ◽  
A. Collins
2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. S77
Author(s):  
Ellen Pudney ◽  
K. Brasseur ◽  
A. Ozier ◽  
M. Norris ◽  
M. O'Connor

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. S109
Author(s):  
Sigry Ortiz Flores ◽  
Francisco Ortiz ◽  
Elizabeth Rodriguez Cruz ◽  
Edelis Diaz Machado ◽  
Bavneet Kaur ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 326-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Hoisington ◽  
Jill Armstrong Shultz ◽  
Sue Butkus

Author(s):  
Christina Kasprzak ◽  
Julia Schoonover ◽  
Deanna Gallicchio ◽  
Lindsey Haynes-Maslow ◽  
Leah Vermont ◽  
...  

Access to affordable fruit and vegetables (F&V) remains a challenge within underserved communities across the United States. Mobile produce markets (mobile markets) are a well-accepted and effective strategy for increasing F&V consumption in these communities. Mobile market organizations share similar missions that focus on food, health, and empowerment, participate in incentive programs, offer nutrition education, utilize grassroots-based marketing strategies, prioritize local produce, and sell competitively priced produce through a market style. While mobile markets have become increasingly prevalent, models vary widely. Establishing standardized practices is essential for ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of this important food access program. This research seeks to identify common practices of established mobile markets and describe the resources they rely on.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1303-1303
Author(s):  
Gretchen George ◽  
Melanie Gerdes

Abstract Objectives Food insecurity is prevalent on college campuses. Many campuses have food assistance programs (e.g., food pantries, cooking classes, government support) to provide resources and education but research has identified that knowledge related healthy food selection, meal planning, food budgeting, and safe food preparation skills are suboptimal. The objective of this pilot study was to determine the most effective nutrition education model to increase self-efficacy, skill, knowledge, and food choice awareness in the food insecure college student. Methods Eligible university students (N = 54) were recruited and randomized to a three-arm four-week intervention. All participants received weekly food pantry items and pilot nutrition education curriculum through different application models; food demonstration and handout (FD, n = 20), cooking class and handout (CC, n = 14), or handout only (H, n = 20). The weekly one-hour CC was hands-on with tasting at the end. The weekly 20-minute FD was observation only with tasting at the end. Participants completed a validated pre-post survey. Results Using MANOVA, statistically significant (P < 0.05) pre-post changes were identified in all scores (food selection planning, food preparation, food safety storage). The overall food skills score (OFSS), a combined measure, indicated a statistically significant interaction effect between study arms on the combined dependent variable, F(2, 51) = 5.37, P = 0.008, Wilks’ Λ = 0.826, partial n2 = 0.174. A follow-up univariate two-way analysis using Tukey pairwise comparisons identified non-significant pre-post mean differences for OFSS scores between CC (+44.29), FD (+16.05), and H (+20.30). Conclusions Nutrition education through a CC, FD, and H model improves knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy in food insecure students. CC have the largest pre-post improvements but tended to have more attrition. Universities with food pantries should include nutrition education ideally with a hands-on or observation component including tasting of new recipes and foods mirroring food pantry offerings. Campuses can use concise 4-week curriculum to maximize learning and self-efficacy while considering resources (staff, space, materials). Funding Sources California State University Small-Scale Faculty Research Grants 2019-2020 15 K.


2011 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah MacLellan ◽  
Catherine Morley ◽  
Karol Traviss ◽  
Theresa Cividin

Purpose: Dietitian and consumer perspectives on nutrition education needs and preferences were explored, as these relate to health status. Methods: Phases 1 and 2 of a three-phase, mixed-methods study are reported. Phase 1 was a national online survey of dietitians, which was designed to inform the development of a consumer survey (Phase 2). Consumers responded to an online survey about their demographics, medical conditions, and nutrition education needs (what they wanted to learn) and preferences (how they wanted to learn). Phase 3 involved teleconferenced discussion groups with dietitians across Canada to develop guidelines for nutrition education. Results: Dietitian respondents (n=441) perceived that consumer health status was important in predicting needs and preferences for nutrition education; emotional support was considered most important for consumers with life-altering medical conditions. Consumers (n=680) expressed interest in an array of nutrition education approaches; cooking tips, recipes, and supplement advice were the most popular. Respondents with and without medical conditions had similar nutrition education needs and preferences. Conclusions: Because of the complexity of nutrition education and consumers’ preference for a spectrum of approaches and delivery methods, evidence-based nutrition education guidelines are important to inform dietetics training for the provision of client-centred nutrition education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document