The neglected relationship between social interaction anxiety and hedonic deficits: differentiation from depressive symptoms

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 719-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd B Kashdan
2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-403
Author(s):  
Megan G. Strickland ◽  
Phyllis Anastasio

Introduction: Early co-rumination research has demonstrated that engagement in co-rumination, or persistent discussion of one's problems at length, can lead to increased depressive and anxious symptoms. There is limited research examining the direct relationship between a specialized type of anxiety—social interaction anxiety—and co-rumination, and that research has conflicting results, making it unclear what the relationship between the two is. The purpose of the present study was to further examine the relationship between co-rumination and social interaction anxiety, depressive symptoms, and symptoms of anxiety. Method: Ninety-six college women and men completed online questionnaires twice, separated by one month. Results: We found that co-rumination at Time 1 negatively predicted social interaction anxiety at Time 2. We also found co-rumination predicted reduced depressive symptoms, but only among those who had moderate and high levels of social interaction anxiety. In that respect, our findings replicate van Zalk and Tillfors (2017), who found that co-rumination acts as a buffer against depressive symptoms for individuals high in social anxiety. Our study also offers an extension of van Zalk and Tillfors in that the same pattern was found for anxious symptoms, but only among those with the highest levels of social interaction anxiety. Discussion: Therefore, co-rumination for highly socially-anxious individuals may serve as a form of positive social support, which highlights important individual differences on internalizing symptoms.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1116-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Nicholas Carleton ◽  
Michel A. Thibodeau ◽  
Justin W. Weeks ◽  
Michelle J. N. Teale Sapach ◽  
Peter M. McEvoy ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. E71-E81 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Nicholas Carleton ◽  
Kelsey C. Collimore ◽  
Gordon J.G. Asmundson ◽  
Randi E. McCabe ◽  
Karen Rowa ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Possis ◽  
Joshua J. Kemp ◽  
James J. Lickel ◽  
Jennifer T. Sy ◽  
Laura J. Dixon ◽  
...  

Cognitive-behavioral theories suggest that anxiety is maintained in part by estimates of the probability and cost of feared negative outcomes. Social phobia may be unique among the anxiety disorders in that it is characterized by overestimates of the cost of events that are objectively noncatastrophic (e.g., committing social mishaps). As such, treatment approaches that target cost bias may be particularly effective in reducing social phobia symptoms. This study examined the efficacy of 2 cost-specific techniques in a single-session intervention for social anxiety. Individuals (n = 61) with elevated social interaction anxiety were randomly assigned to an expressive writing control condition, a cognitive restructuring condition, or a behavioral experiment condition. Results demonstrated that the cognitive restructuring condition produced significantly greater improvement in indices of social anxiety than the other conditions. Reduction in cost bias fully mediated the significantly greater improvement in social interaction anxiety in the cognitive restructuring condition relative to the behavioral experiment condition. The present findings highlight the value of techniques designed to reduce cost biases in social anxiety. Clinical implications are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document