The Nighttime Fears Scale: Development and psychometric evidence of a standardized self-report scale to assess nighttime fears in children

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 102369
Author(s):  
Mireia Orgilés ◽  
Iván Fernández-Martínez ◽  
José P. Espada ◽  
Alexandra Morales
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Bin Sheu ◽  
Abigail S. Y. Dubovi ◽  
Michael M. Gale ◽  
Megan E. Cusick

SAGE Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824401986580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Branson ◽  
Matthew J. Dry ◽  
Edward Palmer ◽  
Deborah Turnbull

Lay definitions tend to conceptualize stress as negative, undesirable, and maladaptive. However, contemporary stress models emphasize the differentiation between negative and positive stress responses, known as distress and eustress. Despite prominent theoretical conceptualisations accepting the existence of eustress, the vast majority of stress measures tend to focus exclusively on the distress response. The current study introduces the Adolescent Distress-Eustress Scale (ADES) which holistically captures both aspects of the stress response, bridging the gap between theory and measurement and counteracting the typically negatively focused approach to stress research. The ADES was systematically developed and tested in a socio-educationally diverse sample of 981 adolescents ( Mage = 15.19, 50.62% female). The finalized self-report scale consists of two 5-item subscales, individually indexing distress and eustress. Initial psychometric properties of the ADES are promising, and the scale has the potential to meet the needs of researchers, schools, and organizations.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdogan Koc ◽  
Ahu Yazici Ayyildiz

PurposeScales play an important role in researching and understanding a field. This study aims to explore scales developed in hospitality and tourism to identify the trends and the gaps in the scale development studies with a view to make scale development recommendations for future studies.Design/methodology/approachThe study explores and analyses 253 scales developed from the perspectives of scope and methodology. The scales were first grouped into categories to identify trends and gaps in scale development to be able to make recommendations from the scope perspective. Then, for the methodology perspective, the scales were analysed according to various criteria such as sampling, reliability, validity and pilot testing reporting.FindingsThe study shows that while there are opportunities in some areas to develop newer scales, some areas appear to be saturated. It is important to note that all scales appear to be self-report scales which may result in the measurement of self-perceptions of people alone regarding a phenomenon. The study also pointed out some of the methodological shortcomings in the scales developed.Research limitations/implicationsThe study has both theoretical and practical implications. From a theoretical implications perspective, the study identified the overlaps and the gaps in scale development and provided several new scale development ideas concerning their scopes/topics and methodologies. From a practical perspective, the study shed light on the extent which the scales are relevant and useable by the practitioners in the tourism and hospitality establishments.Originality/valueThe study is original as there is no collective review of hospitality and tourism scales. The study identifies the trends, gaps, overlaps and some of the weaknesses of the scales developed and offers several valuable recommendations for the future.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 812-836
Author(s):  
Matthew Browne ◽  
Matthew Rockloff ◽  
Vijay Rawat

Development and refinement of self-report measures generally involves selecting a subset of indicators from a larger set. Despite the importance of this task, methods applied to accomplish this are often idiosyncratic and ad hoc, or based on incomplete statistical criteria. We describe a structural equation modeling (SEM)-based technique, based on the standardized residual variance–covariance matrix, which subsumes multiple traditional psychometric criteria: item homogeneity, reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity. SEMs with a fixed structure, but with substituted candidate items, can be used to evaluate the relative performance of those items. Using simulated data sets, we demonstrate a simple progressive elimination algorithm, which demonstrably optimizes item choice across multiple psychometric criteria. This method is then applied to the task of short-form development of the multidimensional “4Es” (Excitement, Esteem, Escape, Excess) scale, which are understood as indicators of psychological vulnerability to gambling problems. It is concluded that the proposed SEM-based algorithm provides an automatic and efficient approach to the item-reduction stage of scale development and should be similarly useful for the development of short forms of preexisting scales. Broader use of such an algorithm would promote more transparent, consistent, and replicable scale development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-442
Author(s):  
Ulrich Schimmack

In a prior publication, I used structural equation modeling of multimethod data to examine the construct validity of Implicit Association Tests. The results showed no evidence that IATs measure implicit constructs (e.g., implicit self-esteem, implicit racial bias). This critique of IATs elicited several responses by implicit social-cognition researchers, who tried to defend the validity and usefulness of IATs. I carefully examine these arguments and show that they lack validity. IAT proponents consistently ignore or misrepresent facts that challenge the validity of IATs as measures of individual differences in implicit cognitions. One response suggests that IATs can be useful even if they merely measure the same constructs as self-report measures, but I find no support for the claim that IATs have practically significant incremental predictive validity. In conclusions, IATs are widely used without psychometric evidence of construct or predictive validity.


Assessment ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Foy ◽  
Jenifer L. Wood ◽  
Daniel W. King ◽  
Lynda A. King ◽  
Heidi S. Resnick

The Los Angeles Symptom Checklist (LASC) is a self-report measure of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and general distress that has been used with a variety of adult trauma populations. This study provided psychometric support for the instrument's use with adolescents. Internal consistency estimates were .90 and .95 for the 17-item PTSD index and the 43-item full-scale index, respectively. When mean scores were compared across trauma exposure groups, results were supportive of the LASC's ability to detect symptoms of posttrauma sequelae. Confirmatory factor analysis findings supported three highly correlated factors representing the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) symptom categories of reexperiencing, avoidance and numbing, and arousal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document