scholarly journals Veterinary Prescription Errors in a Community Pharmacy Setting: A Retrospective Review

Author(s):  
Melia McDaniel ◽  
Elly Glazier ◽  
NiNi Truong ◽  
Leslie Marsh ◽  
Noah Cahill ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-353
Author(s):  
Sabeeha Kausar ◽  
Muhammad Imran

Objective: This study was conducted to analyze and evaluate the prevalence of prescription errors, to optimize the medication effectiveness and patient safety and to encourage the rational prescribing practices. Method: sample of 250 prescriptions was randomly collected from outdoor hospital pharmacy (n=157) and from community pharmacy (n=93) and analyzed manually to estimate the prevalence of prescription errors. Results: Results calculated by using SPPS Version 23 and MS Excel 2013 are as follow; 41.4% prescription collected from outdoor hospital pharmacy presented significant prescribing errors while 54.7% in sample collected from community pharmacy. The prescriptions were segregated and errors were estimated using following parameters; dose, dosage form, dosing frequency, drug-drug interactions, spelling, and duplication of generic, therapy duration and unnecessary drugs. Conclusion: The prevalence of prescribing errors in sample of community pharmacy was 12.37% greater than found in prescriptions of hospital pharmacy. The prevalence of prescription errors can be reduced by physician education, using automated prescribing systems and immediate review of prescription by pharmacist before dispensing of prescription items to patients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46
Author(s):  
Rosemin Kassam ◽  
Linda G Martin ◽  
Karen B Farris ◽  
Homero A Monsanto ◽  
Jean-Marie Kaiser

Background The medication appropriateness index (MAI) has demonstrated reliability in selected outpatient clinics where medical data were easily accessible from medical charts. However, its use in the community setting where patient data may be limited has not been examined. Objective To evaluate the usefulness of a modified MAI for use in the community pharmacy setting by testing interrater reliability using 3 different rating schemes. Methods Two raters evaluated 160 medications for 32 elderly ambulatory patients. Patient information was acquired using community pharmacist-collected medication histories. A summated MAI score, percent agreement, κ, positive agreement, negative agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated for each criterion using 3 scoring schemes. A paired samples t-test (95% CI) was used to test interrater reliability. Results The κ statistics were >0.75 for indication and effectiveness, but good (0.41–0.66) for the remaining criteria using the Hanlon scoring scheme. The intraclass coefficients (0.82, 0.86, 0.87) and overall κ (0.65, 0.66, 0.61) were similar for the 3 schemes. Conclusions This study suggests that the modified MAI has the potential to detect medication appropriateness and inappropriateness in the community pharmacy setting; however, it is not without limitations. Because the MAI has the most clinimetric and psychometric data available, the instrument should be studied further to increase its reliability and generalizability.


2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1052-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Dillon ◽  
Derek Stewart ◽  
Susan M. Smith ◽  
Paul Gallagher ◽  
Gráinne Cousins

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Troels Christensen ◽  
Birthe Søndergaard ◽  
Per Hartvig Honoré ◽  
Ole Jannik Bjerrum

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. S324
Author(s):  
Nicki Palmer ◽  
Paul John ◽  
Kerry Rockey ◽  
Rhys Oakley ◽  
Brendan Healy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document