Estimation of Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid FNA Samples with Atypia/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance and Suspicious for Follicular Neoplasm Using mRNA Expression Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. S68-S69
Author(s):  
Tom Traweek ◽  
Katie O'Reilly ◽  
Cherry Starling ◽  
Robert Monroe
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Mrna Expression Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Thyroid Fna ◽  
Estimation Of Risk ◽  
Undetermined Significance

scholarly journals Correlation study of thyroid nodule cytopathology and histopathology at two institutions in Jordan

CytoJournal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niveen Abdullah ◽  
Manar Hajeer ◽  
Loay Abudalu ◽  
Maher Sughayer
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Category ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Correlation Study ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Thyroid Fna ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Background: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) plays a fundamental role in determining the appropriate management for patients presenting with thyroid nodules. Aims: The aims of this study are to evaluate thyroid FNA test performance parameters through a cytohistological correlation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all thyroid FNAs received over a period of 18 months was carried out. The findings were compared to their subsequent definite diagnoses on surgical specimens as well as to their follow-up repeat FNA results. A total of 499 thyroid FNAs were collected and reviewed against The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). The percentage of each diagnostic category was calculated, and the implied risk of malignancy was determined by comparing the cytology results to their definite diagnoses obtained on the resection specimens. Analytical procedures were performed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Out of 499 thyroid FNAs, a benign interpretation was found in 273 patients (54.7%), atypia of undetermined significance in 81 (16.2%), follicular neoplasm in 20 (4%), suspicious for malignancy in 36 (7.2%), malignant in 32 (6.4%) and were nondiagnostic in 57 patients (11.4%). Only 101 patients (20.2%) underwent surgical resection and 47 (9.4%) underwent a follow-up FNA. After cytohistological correlation, FNA test performance, calculated by excluding the inadequate and undetermined categories revealed test sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 95.6%, 54.8%, and 78.9%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 75.4%, and the negative predictive value was 89.5%. Conclusions: Our results are comparable to those previously published figures. The rate of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance is higher than what is currently recommended in TBSRTC.

Application of the Bethesda Classification for Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration: Institutional Experience and Meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (10) ◽  
pp. 1121-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot A. Krauss ◽  
Megan Mahon ◽  
Jean M. Fede ◽  
Lanjing Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Thyroid Fna ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Context.—Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies have been an important component in the preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules. Until the introduction of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) in 2008, individual institutions had developed their own diagnostic categories. The BSRTC proposed 6 categories in an attempt to standardize reporting of thyroid FNA. Objective.—To present a 15-year experience of thyroid FNA at one institution, including data before and after introduction of the BSRTC. The risk of malignancy is compared with the meta-analysis of high-quality published data. Data Sources.—Data sources were PubMed, a manual search of references, and institutional data. Conclusions.—The diagnostic categories developed at our institution were similar to those proposed by the BSRTC, with best fit into the 6 categories easily accomplished and reported in the final 2 years of the study. Significant differences were noted in the frequencies of cases in diagnostic categories Benign (II; P = .003), Suspicious for follicular neoplasm/Follicular neoplasm (IV; P < .001), and Malignant (VI; P = .003) after the introduction of the BSRTC. Eighteen published articles met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The risk of malignancy in each category in our institution was similar to that determined in the meta-analysis, except for Insufficient for diagnosis (I; 20% versus 9%–14%). Meta-analysis showed an overlapping 95% CI of risk of malignancy between Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (III; 11%–23%) and Suspicious for follicular neoplasm/Follicular neoplasm (IV; 20%–29%), suggesting similar risks of malignancy. The use of newer molecular tests for these indeterminate cases may further refine risk assessment.

Risk of Malignancy and Risk of Neoplasia in the Bethesda Indeterminate Categories: Study on 4,532 Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirations from a Single Institution in India

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swati Mahajan ◽  
Radhika Srinivasan ◽  
Arvind Rajwanshi ◽  
Bishan Radotra ◽  
Naresh Panda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Internal Quality ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Thyroid Fna ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Objectives: To determine the frequency of category 3 (atypia of undetermined significance [AUS]/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [FLUS]), category 4 (follicular neoplasm), and category 5 (suspicious for malignancy) of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), the risk of malignancy (ROM) and the risk of neoplasia (RON) in these categories. Study Design: A retrospective 6-year audit of 4,532 thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNA) reported as per the TBSRTC from a single institution with cytohistological correlation in 335 cases. Results: The frequency of categories 3, 4, and 5 was 2.5, 3.9, and 0.5%, respectively; the upper and lower bound estimates of ROM being 58.3, 23.6, 75% and 5.1, 5, and 12.5%, respectively. AUS/FLUS (n = 116) cases were subcategorized as AUS, AUS-HC (Hürthle cell), AUS-PTC (AUS-papillary thyroid carcinoma not excluded), FLUS, FLUS-FH (favor hyperplasia), FLUS-HC, and FLUS-PTC. The AUS/FLUS malignancy ratio was 1:3.8. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of FNA thyroid was 80.5, 85.9, 80.7, 85.7, and 82.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Implementation of TBSRTC aided in achieving internal quality control in reporting thyroid FNA cytology. The AUS/FLUS frequency was 2.5%, which is at the lower range of the recommended rate and was associated with a higher than recommended upper bound estimate, but a comparable lower bound estimate of ROM.

scholarly journals Identification of cancer/testis genes by database mining and mRNA expression analysis

2002 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Scanlan ◽  
Claudia M. Gordon ◽  
Barbara Williamson ◽  
Sang-Yull Lee ◽  
Yao-Tseng Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Database Mining ◽  
Mrna Expression Analysis ◽  
Cancer Testis

scholarly journals The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Cytohistological Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bakiarathana Anand ◽  
Anita Ramdas ◽  
Marie Moses Ambroise ◽  
Nirmal P. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Follicular Neoplasm ◽  
Risk Of Malignancy ◽  
Bethesda System ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Thyroid Cytopathology ◽  
The Bethesda System ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Introduction. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is a significant step to standardize the reporting of thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA). It has high predictive value, reproducibility, and improved clinical significance. Aim. The study was aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility and reproducibility of “TBSRTC” at our institute. Methods and Material. The study included 646 thyroid FNAs which were reviewed by three pathologists and classified according to TBSRTC. Cytohistological correlation was done for 100 cases with surgical follow-up and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and risk of malignancy (ROM) were calculated. The interobserver variation among three pathologists was also assessed. Results. The distribution of cases in various TBSRTC categories is as follows: I—nondiagnostic 13.8%, II—benign 75.9%, III—atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) 1.2%, IV—follicular neoplasm (FN)/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN) 3.7%, V—suspicious for malignancy (SM) 2.6%, and VI—malignant 2.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy are 72.4%, 94.3%, 84%, 89.2%, and 87.9%, respectively. The ROM of various TBSRTC categories were II—8.5%; III—66.7%; IV—63.6%; and V and VI—100%. Cohen’s Weighted Kappa score was 0.99 which indicates almost perfect agreement among the three pathologists. Conclusions. Our study substantiates greater reproducibility among pathologists using TBSRTC to arrive at a precise diagnosis with an added advantage of predicting the risk of malignancy which enables the clinician to plan for follow-up or surgery and also the extent of surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document