Evaluation of Choosing Wisely Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines at a Rural Tertiary Academic Medical Center: How Are We Doing?

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. S74-S75
Author(s):  
Sara Brownschidle ◽  
Tim St. John ◽  
Mark Fung ◽  
Elise Everett ◽  
Gregory Warrington ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 153 (6) ◽  
pp. 734-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Paul Morris ◽  
Sayanan Chowsilpa ◽  
Sara Mustafa ◽  
Isaac Chan ◽  
Daniel Miller ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives In 2012, the US Preventive Services Task Force decreased the recommended frequency of cervical cytology screening to once every 3 years and recommended against testing women younger than 21 years regardless of sexual history. We evaluated the impact of this in 21 to 29-year-old women at a tertiary care academic medical center in 2011 and 2017. Methods We retrospectively analyzed Papanicolaou test results at two time points in 21- to 29-year-old women. Results There was a decrease in the number of high-grade lesions in 21- to 25-year-old women (odds ratio [OR], 0.36) from 2011 to 2017. Within the 26- to 29-year-old patient group, there was a trend toward a higher percentage of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in 2017 compared to 2011 on cytology, which did not reach statistical significance (OR, 1.46). However, follow-up histologic specimens showed a higher percentage of HSIL in 2017 compared to 2011 in this age group (OR, 2.16). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the cervical cancer screening guidelines introduced in 2012 have not had a detrimental impact on the outcomes of cervical cancer screening for 21- to 25-year-old women. However, we need to continue monitoring the effects of decreased screening in 26- to 29-year-old women.


2020 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 105928
Author(s):  
Erika L. Thompson ◽  
Annalynn M. Galvin ◽  
Ellen M. Daley ◽  
Ovidiu Tatar ◽  
Gregory D. Zimet ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine B. Roland ◽  
Vicki B. Benard ◽  
Mona Saraiya ◽  
Nikki A. Hawkins ◽  
Heather Brandt ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Channa E Schmeink ◽  
Leon FAG Massuger ◽  
Willem JG Melchers ◽  
Ruud LM Bekkers ◽  
◽  
...  

Primary screening based on detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) has proved to be more sensitive than cytology for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Self-sampling for specimen collection may also improve the participation rate, especially in the non-responder group. However, HPV is highly prevalent and therefore HPV detection has a lower specificity in cervical cancer screening than cytology. In addition to the clinically validated HPV test, HPV dynamics should be taken into account. It is important to identify women with a chronic productive infection likely to cause, or to already have caused, high-grade CIN or cervical carcinoma, and to limit overtreatment of women with a transient infection. Furthermore, the introduction of the HPV vaccine is likely to lower the incidence of CIN and cervical carcinoma, which will lower the positive predictive value of cervical cancer screening. This potential impact needs to be taken into account when planning for future screening guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document