The AccuCath Intravenous Catheter System With Retractable Coiled Tip Guidewire and Conventional Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Comparison

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bette K. Idemoto ◽  
James R. Rowbottom ◽  
James D. Reynolds ◽  
Ronald L. Hickman
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Dwell Time ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Background Current ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Catheter System ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Intravenous Catheters

Abstract Background: Current peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) first attempt success averages 47%, complications 47%, and dwell time 44 hours. Multiple intravenous (IV) access lines requiring replacement during each admission result in poor satisfaction and unnecessary costs. With 2011 Infusion Nursing Society standards allowing IV lines to dwell until complication, there is incentive to explore improvement opportunities. Purpose: A new, proprietary coiled tip guidewire PIV was compared with conventional IV catheters in adult patients. The experimental IV catheter was projected to have a higher rate of successful placement on first attempt, fewer complications, longer dwell times, higher completion of therapy, higher user satisfaction, and lower overall costs than conventional catheters. Methods: Adult patients requiring nonemergent IV catheters provided consent and were enrolled and randomized. The study, conducted over 4 months, included 248 patients (experimental IV group n =123, conventional IV group n =125). Results: Experimental IV first attempt success was 89% compared with 47% for the conventional catheter. Fifty percent of conventional IV placements required a second attempt. Experimental IV complications occurred 8% of the time and complications occurred with the conventional catheter 52% of the time. Completion of therapy was 89% with the experimental IV versus 34% with the conventional IV (P < .001). Dwell time improved with the experimental IV (mean 4.4 days [105 hours] vs conventional IV at 1.5 days [35 hours]) (P < .001). Overall patient satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale scored an average of 4.5 with the experimental IV compared with the conventional IV, which scored 3. Conclusions: A new, proprietary coiled tip guidewire-delivered PIV demonstrated clear superiority over the conventional catheter in our study. Clinical outcome results showed statistically significant improvements in first attempt success, complications, completion of therapy, dwell time, and overall patient satisfaction.

scholarly journals Routine Replacement versus Clinical Monitoring of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in a Regional Hospital in the Home Program A Randomized Controlled Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 915-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Van Donk ◽  
Claire M. Rickard ◽  
Matthew R. McGrail ◽  
Glenn Doolan
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Home Program ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Intravenous Catheters

This randomized, controlled trial involving 316 patients in the home setting found no difference in the rate of phlebitis and/or occlusion among patients for whom a peripheral intravenous catheter was routinely resited at 72-96 hours and those for whom it was replaced only on clinical indication (76.8 events per 1,000 device-days vs 87.3 events per 1,000 device-days; P = .71). There were no bloodstream infections.

Ultrasound-guided placement of peripherally inserted intravenous catheters increase catheter dwell time in children

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982092982
Author(s):  
James Thomas Cottrell ◽  
Todd Chang ◽  
Jennifer Baird ◽  
Joanna Barreras ◽  
Marsha A Elkhunovich
Keyword(s):  
Dwell Time ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Free Standing ◽  
Probability Of Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Intravenous Catheters

Objective: To compare the dwell times of ultrasound-guided and non-ultrasound-guided short peripheral intravenous catheters in hospitalized children. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from 256 ultrasound-guided and 287 traditional peripheral intravenous catheters placed in hospitalized children between 1 September2016 and 31 October 2016 at a free-standing children’s hospital with a 10-member vascular access team. A two-sample independent t test and Kaplan–Meier estimator were used to assess differences in dwell times between the ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters and non-ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters. Child age, peripheral intravenous catheter location, and subjective difficulty of placement were also analyzed. Results: There was a significant difference in mean hours of dwell time for ultrasound-guided versus non-ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters (96.06 vs 59.39, p < 0.001). Mean increase in dwell time was 36.68 h (95% CI: [24.14–49.22]). Median dwell times (50% probability of survival) for ultrasound-guided and non-ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheters were 118 h (95% CI: [95–137]) and 71 h (95% CI: [61–79]), respectively. None of the additional covariates were significant predictors of dwell time. Conclusion: Peripheral intravenous catheters placed using ultrasound-guided methods had a significantly longer dwell time than those placed using non-ultrasound-guided methods in a cohort of hospitalized pediatric patients. This is in line with the findings in the adult literature and may suggest a need to increase the use of ultrasound-guided method for peripheral intravenous catheter placement in pediatric practice.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Phlebitis in Patients with Peripheral Intravenous Catheters

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Fengmei Tan ◽  
Silin Zheng ◽  
Hongyan Wu ◽  
Lixia Nie ◽  
Wenhua Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Dwell Time ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Outer Diameter ◽  
Hypertonic Solution ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Infusion Solution ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Insertion Sites ◽  
Intravenous Catheters

Introduction: The study investigated the risk factors of phlebitis associated with infusion by peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC). Methodology: Hospitalized adults (n = 506) were placed with PIVCs by trained nurses. Rates of phlebitis were noted according to PIVC gauge, insertion site, and dwell time; and type and volume of infusion solution. Results: The development of phlebitis appeared to be significantly associated with the size of the outer diameter of the PIVC. The rate of phlebitis among patients given a hypertonic infusion solution was significantly higher; and also associated with infusion volume. There was no difference in phlebitis development among insertion sites, and dwell times among these sites were comparable. Conclusion: The risk of phlebitis increased with the PIVC size and volume of infusion solution, and use of a hypertonic solution. The recognition of risk factors and standardized intervention may reduce the occurrence of phlebitis associated with PIVC use.

scholarly journals Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Is an Underrecognized Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eloise D. Austin ◽  
Sean B. Sullivan ◽  
Susan Whittier ◽  
Franklin D. Lowy ◽  
Anne-Catrin Uhlemann
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia ◽  
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Life Threatening Complication ◽  
Intravenous Catheters

Abstract Few studies have focused on the risks of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVs) as sources for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), a life-threatening complication. We identified 34 PIV-related infections (7.6%) in a cohort of 445 patients with SAB. Peripheral intravenous catheter-related SAB was associated with significantly longer bacteremia duration and thrombophlebitis at old PIV sites rather than current PIVs.

scholarly journals Transversus Abdominis Plane Block versus Wound Infiltration with Conventional Local Anesthetics in Adult Patients Underwent Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Cai ◽  
Mei-ling Gao ◽  
Guan-yu Chen ◽  
Ling-hui Pan
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Local Anesthetics ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Wound Infiltration ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background. How to effectively control the postoperative pain of patients is extremely important to clinicians. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a novel analgesic method reported to greatly decrease postoperative pain. However, in many areas, there still exists a phenomenon of surgeons using wound infiltration (WI) with conventional local anesthetics (not liposome anesthetics) as the main means to decrease postoperative pain because of traditional wisdom or convenience. Here, we compared the analgesic effectiveness of the two different methods to determine which method is more suitable for adult patients. Materials and methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP block and WI without liposome anesthetics in adult patients were performed. Frequently used databases were extensively searched. The main outcomes were postoperative pain scores in different situations (at rest or during movement) and the time until the first use of rescue analgesics. The secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence and patient satisfaction scores. Results. Fifteen studies with 983 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present study. The heterogeneity in the final analysis regarding the pain score was low to moderate. The major results of the sensitivity analysis were stable. WI had the same analgesic effect as TAP block only at the one-hour postoperative time point (mean difference=−0.32, 95% confidence interval (-0.87, 0.24), P=0.26) and was associated with a shorter time until the first rescue analgesic and poorer patient satisfaction. Conclusion. TAP block results in a more effective and steady analgesic effect than WI with conventional local anesthetics in adult patients from the early postoperative period and obtains higher patient satisfaction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document