scholarly journals Have the difficulties and complications of surgical treatment for chondroblastoma of the adjoining knee joint been overestimated?

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 100240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Liu ◽  
Hongbo He ◽  
Yuhao Yuan ◽  
Hao Zeng ◽  
Feng Long ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
O.V. Dolgopolov ◽  
D.V. Siforov

Summary. We have analyzed the literature to determine the tactics of the knee menisci injury surgical treatment. It has been determined that the use of cellular technologies for suturing a damaged meniscus allows satisfactory results even in patients with ruptures in the avascular zones, despite the fact that partial meniscectomy is considered the "gold standard" of surgical treatment for ruptures in the “white” zone. It should be considered the advantages and disadvantages of different stitching techniques and the specific clinical and physical characteristics of each patient.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 30-38
Author(s):  
A A Akhpashev ◽  
N V Zagorodny ◽  
S N Kaurkin ◽  
D V Skvortsov

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is most often structures to be damaged. In this research investigated biomechanics of walking at the timing, kinematics and dynamics parameters for 34 patients which had verified rupture of ACL. The 11 patients were investigated before surgical treatment and 23 after it. Investigations of patients of the first group were made at the time of 1 week to 6 years after trauma of the knee joint (the average meaning is 18 months). The second group was investigated at the time from 1,5 month to 5,5 years (the average meaning is 13 months).At the current research we did not find any specific for rupture of ACL functional disturbances during level walking compare to normal data and healthy limp. However, we assume some tendency to increase of flection-extention movement at the damaged knee joint after surgery.This result could give us some basis for revision the term of instability, because we did not get definite symptoms at our study.


ScienceRise ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3 (15)) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Андрій Вікторович Літовченко ◽  
Микола Іванович Березка ◽  
Максим Олегович Гуліда ◽  
Євгеній Владиславович Гарячий

Author(s):  
Vladimir A. ​ Ivantsov ◽  
I.P. Bogdanovich ◽  
V.V. Lashkovskiy ◽  
V.S. Anosov

Objective. To characterize periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing a total hip and knee joint replacement. Materials and Methods. A total of 77 patients with periprosthetic infection following hip and knee joint replacement hospitalized in Grodno City Clinical Hospital were studied over the period of 2014-2018. Wound discharge, tissue samples, and fistula’s wall swab were used for microbiological tests. The analysis of surgical treatment of patients with deep periprosthetic knee and hip joint infection has been performed. Results. Periprosthetic infection after hip joint arthroplasty was observed in 32 (41.6%) patients, and after total knee joint arthroplasty in 45 (58.4%) patients. Surgical treatment was performed in 18 (56.3%) and 32 (71.1%) patients with periprosthetic infection following total knee and hip joint replacement, respectively. A total of 10 (31.2%) of 32 cultures from patients with periprosthetic infection after total hip joint replacement and 8 (17.8%) of 45 cultures from patients with periprosthetic infection after total knee joint replacement were positive. Overall, Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 9 (50%) of 18 positive cultures. Gram-negative aerobic bacteria (Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were detected in 4⁄10 and 5⁄8 of positive cultures from patients with periprosthetic infection of hip and knee joints, respectively. Conclusions. The most common pathogens causing periprosthetic infection of hip and knee joints were S. aureus (50%) and Gram-negative bacteria. The surgical treatment was performed in 71.4% of patients with periprosthetic joint infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document