Population-Level Outcomes with a 2-Step Approach for Gestational Diabetes Screening and Diagnosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 596-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.E. Donovan ◽  
A.L. Edwards ◽  
A. Savu ◽  
S. Butalia ◽  
E.A. Ryan ◽  
...  
Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1518-P
Author(s):  
CARRIE J. SZABLOWSKI ◽  
EMILY SUSCHA ◽  
KADDY DAVIS ◽  
CHARLES Z. XIE ◽  
KEITH MOSKOWITZ ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110165
Author(s):  
Elaine Seaton Banerjee ◽  
Kyle Shaak ◽  
Nicole Burgess ◽  
Melanie Johnson ◽  
Beth Careyva

Introduction/Objectives: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. Results: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. Conclusions: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Engin Korkmazer ◽  
Neşe Solak ◽  
Vehbi Yavuz Tokgöz

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanna Koivunen ◽  
Annukka Torkki ◽  
Aini Bloigu ◽  
Mika Gissler ◽  
Anneli Pouta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah R. Lucas ◽  
Roxann C. Williams ◽  
Laura N. Hollar ◽  
Bethany Johnson-Javois ◽  
Heidi B. Miller ◽  
...  

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases type 2 diabetes risk; however, postpartum diabetes screening rates are low. Using semi-structured interviews and focus groups, this study investigates the understanding of GDM and its relationship to future diabetes risk and diabetes prevention among patients with public or no insurance (<i>n </i>= 36), health care providers (<i>n </i>= 21), and clinic staff (<i>n </i>= 9) from Federally Qualified Health Centers. Five main themes emerged: <i>1</i>) general understanding of GDM diagnosis with focus on neonatal complications; <i>2</i>) variable recall of diet, exercise, and weight recommendations; <i>3</i>) overwhelming medication and self-monitoring routines; <i>4</i>) short-term focus of type 2 diabetes risk and screening; and <i>5</i>) limited understanding of all options for diabetes prevention. The results may inform diabetes screening and prevention interventions in primary care settings.


2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S483-S484
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Miller ◽  
Meryl Sperling ◽  
Giovanna Cruz ◽  
Jay Schulkin ◽  
Stephanie A. Leonard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document