scholarly journals Provider utilization of gestational diabetes screening methods – Have practices changed since the HAPO trial?

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S483-S484
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Miller ◽  
Meryl Sperling ◽  
Giovanna Cruz ◽  
Jay Schulkin ◽  
Stephanie A. Leonard ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahid Alikhani ◽  
Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh ◽  
Aziz Rezapour ◽  
Nahid Hatam

Background: The American Diabetes Association defines gestational diabetes as no glucose tolerance in the second or third quarter of pregnancy. Gestational diabetes imposes a huge economic burden on the health system. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes is important because it not only predicts prenatal disorders but also affects the long-term outcomes of the mother and child. Since screening tests are costly, it is necessary to find a cheaper method with an acceptable feature. Objectives: The present study aimed to examine the costs of gestational diabetes screening in pregnant women referring to gynecology hospitals affiliated with medical sciences universities in Tehran. Methods: This was a descriptive-analytical study conducted in the selected hospitals affiliated with medical sciences universities in Tehran in 2016. The study population included all the pregnant women with no risk factors, referring to the selected centers. A multi-stage random sampling model was utilized, and the sample size was 392. The data were gathered through the forms designed for recording costs, as well as interviews, and were analyzed using SPSS18 software, t-test, and one-way ANOVA. Results: The mean direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs of the one-step method were $516,960, $71,593, and $142,162, respectively. Also, the mean direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs of the two-step method were $262,890, $46,536, and $28,621, respectively. Conclusions: The screening of pregnant women using the two-step method is cheaper to diagnose diabetes. The results of this study recommend gynecologists to use the two-step method to diagnose gestational diabetes with lower costs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110165
Author(s):  
Elaine Seaton Banerjee ◽  
Kyle Shaak ◽  
Nicole Burgess ◽  
Melanie Johnson ◽  
Beth Careyva

Introduction/Objectives: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. Results: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. Conclusions: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Engin Korkmazer ◽  
Neşe Solak ◽  
Vehbi Yavuz Tokgöz

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanna Koivunen ◽  
Annukka Torkki ◽  
Aini Bloigu ◽  
Mika Gissler ◽  
Anneli Pouta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah R. Lucas ◽  
Roxann C. Williams ◽  
Laura N. Hollar ◽  
Bethany Johnson-Javois ◽  
Heidi B. Miller ◽  
...  

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases type 2 diabetes risk; however, postpartum diabetes screening rates are low. Using semi-structured interviews and focus groups, this study investigates the understanding of GDM and its relationship to future diabetes risk and diabetes prevention among patients with public or no insurance (<i>n </i>= 36), health care providers (<i>n </i>= 21), and clinic staff (<i>n </i>= 9) from Federally Qualified Health Centers. Five main themes emerged: <i>1</i>) general understanding of GDM diagnosis with focus on neonatal complications; <i>2</i>) variable recall of diet, exercise, and weight recommendations; <i>3</i>) overwhelming medication and self-monitoring routines; <i>4</i>) short-term focus of type 2 diabetes risk and screening; and <i>5</i>) limited understanding of all options for diabetes prevention. The results may inform diabetes screening and prevention interventions in primary care settings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1112-1115
Author(s):  
Adriana Sánchez-García ◽  
René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez ◽  
Donato Saldívar-Rodríguez ◽  
Abel Guzmán-López ◽  
Carolina Castillo-Castro ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Valérie Boudreau ◽  
Catherine Lehoux Dubois ◽  
Katherine Desjardins ◽  
Marjolaine Mailhot ◽  
François Tremblay ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Jung Choi ◽  
Jimin Kahng ◽  
Joong Hyun Bin ◽  
Hyun Seung Lee ◽  
Jung Hyun Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document